Integrating consequences of stroke into everyday life – Experiences from a long-term perspective

References

• Walder K, Molineux M. Occupational adaptation and identity reconstruction: a grounded theory synthesis of qualitative studies exploring adults’ experiences of adjustment to chronic disease, major illness or injury. J Occup Sci. 2017;24:225–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, et al. Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018-2030. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3:309–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin V, Krishnamurthi R, Parmar P, et al.; GBD 2013 Stroke Panel Experts Group. Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990-2013: The GBD 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för vård vid stroke – Stöd för styrning och ledning. Stockholm (Sweden): Socialstyrelsen; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghatnekar O, Persson U, Asplund K, et al. Costs for stroke in Sweden 2009 and developments since 1997. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka Ö, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing. 2009;38:27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin LV, Norrving AB, Mensah AG. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120:439–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren A, Giang KW, Lappas G, et al. Twenty-four-year trends in the incidence of ischemic stroke in Sweden from 1987 to 2010. Stroke. 2013;44:2388–2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Feigin VL, et al.; GBD 2013 Stroke Panel Experts Group. Stroke prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years in adults aged 20-64 years in 1990-2013: Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:190–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen CH, Townsend EA. Introduction to occupation. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearsson Education; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Maaijwee NAMM, Rutten-Jacobs LCA, Schaapsmeerders P, et al. Ischaemic stroke in young adults: Risk factors and long-term consequences. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot MH, Phillips SJ, Eskes GA. Fatigue associated with stroke and other neurologic conditions: implications for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1714–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synhaeve NE, Arntz RM, van Alebeek ME, et al. Women have a poorer very long-term functional outcome after stroke among adults aged 18–50 years: the FUTURE study. J Neurol. 2016;263:1099–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten-Jacobs LCA, Maaijwee NAM, Arntz RM, et al. Risk factors and prognosis of young stroke. The FUTURE study: a prospective cohort study. Study rationale and protocol. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:109–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh ME, Galvin R, Loughnane C, et al. Community re-integration and long-term need in the first five years after stroke: results from a national survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1834–1838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe CD, Crichton SL, Heuschmann PU, et al. Estimates of outcomes up to ten years after stroke: analysis from the prospective South London Stroke Register. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, For the ASTRO study group, et al. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study: part 1: gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75:1597–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren C, Jood K, Jern C, et al. Long-term performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in young and middle-aged stroke survivors: results from SAHLSIS outcome. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singam A, Ytterberg C, Tham K, et al. Participation in complex and social everyday activities six years after stroke: predictors for return to pre-stroke level. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0144344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palstam A, Sjodin A, Sunnerhagen KS. Participation and autonomy five years after stroke: a longitudinal observational study. (Research Article) (Report). PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson JS, Westerlind E, Persson HC, et al. Occupational gaps 5 years after stroke. Brain Behav. 2019;9:e01234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis CG, Egan M, Dubouloz CJ, et al. Adaptation following stroke: a personal projects analysis. Rehabil Psychol. 2013;58:287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajo L, Boisselle A. Occupational adaptation as a construct: a scoping review or literature (Report). Open J Occup Ther. 2018;6:2.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson A, Karlsson G, Borell L, et al. The lived experience of memory impairment in daily occupation after acquired brain injury. OTJR. 2007;27:84–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson GE, Möller A, Blomstrand C. A qualitative study of the consequences of 'hidden dysfunctions' one year after a mild stroke in person <75 years. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1373–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayar S, Stanley M. Occupational adaptation as a social process in everyday life. J Occup Sci. 2015;22:26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarre S, Redlich C, Tinker A, et al. A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: lessons for the study of resilience. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:716–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walder K, Molineux M, Bissett M, et al. Occupational adaptation - analyzing the maturity and understanding of the concept through concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schkade J, Schultz S. Occupational adaptation: toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, Part 1. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46:829–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams S, Murray C. The experience of engaging in occupation following stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76:370–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black MH, Milbourn B, Desjardins K, et al. Understanding the meaning and use of occupational engagement: findings from a scoping review. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82:272–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work. 2002;1:261–283.
   Google Scholar
• Carcary M. The research audit trial - enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. Electronic J Business Res Methods. 2009;7:11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Jellema S, van Der Sande R, van Hees S, et al. Role of environmental factors on resuming valued activities poststroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:991–1002.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnbom K, Lundälv J, Sunnerhagen KS. Long-term participation 7-8 years after stroke: experiences of people in working-age. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman P, Riazi A, Pereira C, et al. Social participation post stroke: a meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:2031–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander A, Iwarsson S, Jönsson A-C, et al. Living and ageing with stroke: an exploration of conditions influencing participation in social and leisure activities over 15 years. Brain Inj. 2018;32:858–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar