An interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders (RemindMe) for people with cognitive impairment: A pilot randomized controlled trial

References

• Stephens JA, Williamson KNC, Berryhill ME. Cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a reference for occupational therapists. OTJR. 2015;35(1):5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun JH, Tan L, Yu JT. Post-stroke cognitive impairment: epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2(8):80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillen G. Stroke rehabilitation: a function-based approach. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation mondiale de la santé, World Health Organization, & World Health Organization Staff. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Viscogliosi C, Desrosiers J, Belleville S. Optimizing participation of older adults with cognitive deficits post-stroke: types of help and Caregiver Burden. Can J Aging. 2019;38(2):222–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Buono V, Corallo F, Bramanti P, et al. Coping strategies and health-related quality of life after stroke. J Health Psychol. 2017;22(1):16–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, et al. Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100:1515–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. National guidelines for stroke care- support for management. Stockholm (Sweden) 2018. (in Swedish); [cited 2021 Apr 16]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/nationella-riktlinjer/2018-12-57.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(1):1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury K, Watts S, Arden-Close E, et al. Developing digital interventions: a methodological guide. Evid Base Compl Alternative Med. 2014;2014:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson S, Friedland D, Woodberry E. Smartphone technology: gentle reminders of everyday tasks for those with prospective memory difficulties post-brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(5):583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannin N, Carr B, Allaous J, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of handheld computers for improving everyday memory functioning in patients with memory impairments after acquired brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(5):470–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman IL, Persson AC, Bartfai A. First steps in designing an all-in-one ICT-based device for persons with cognitive impairment: evaluation of the first mock-up. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Jensen MP, Søberg MS, et al. Information and communication technology-based assistive technology to compensate for impaired cognition in everyday life: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(7):810–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baric V, Andreassen M, Öhman A, et al. Using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders by senior people-a focus group study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen M, Hemmingsson H, Boman IL, et al. Feasibility of an intervention for patients with cognitive impairment using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders (RemindMe) to improve the performance of activities in everyday life. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council [MRC]. Developing and evaluating complex interventions. 2019; [cited 2021 Apr 16]. Available from: https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance.
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge SM, PAFS consensus group, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettlewell J, das Nair R, Radford K. A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(11):1705–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71(4):210–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pretz CR, Kean J, Heinemann AW, et al. A multidimensional Rasch analysis of the Functional Independence Measure based on the national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems national database. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(14):1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EuroQol G. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnlund M, Nyberg L, Bäckman L, et al. Recall of subject-performed tasks, verbal tasks, and cognitive activities across the adult life span: parallel age-related deficits. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2003;10(3):182–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamez E, Myerson J, Morris L, et al. Assessing executive abilities following acute stroke with the trail making test and digit span. Behav Neurol. 2011;24(3):177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger M, Sabariego C, Stollenwerk B, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(7):1205–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt R, Chau B, Jutai JW. The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occup Ther Health Care. 2004;17(3–4):63–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale (NJ): L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman DR, Srinivas B, Emmett TW, et al. Categorizing health outcomes and efficacy of mHealth apps for persons with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR, Kielhofner G. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation: theory and application (5nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz H, Cutchin MP. The transactional perspective on occupation: a way to transcend the individual in health promotion interventions and research. J Occup Sci. 2017;24(4):446–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, et al. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: a community-based trial. Brain Inj. 2008;22(1):19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby G, Gudjonsson G, Rodhe M, et al. The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. Scan J of Rehabil Med. 1996;28:51–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Branco JP, Oliveira S, Sargento-Freitas J, et al. Assessing functional recovery in the first six months after acute ischemic stroke: a prospective, observational study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;55:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson W, Melander Wikman A. Ready for eHealth. Older Swedes’ perceptions of eHealth Services: using the PIADS scale as a predictor for readiness. Technologies. 2016;4(3):29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar