An overview & critical review of the Sensory Profile – second edition

References

• Dean EE, Little LM, Wallisch A, et al. Sensory processing in everyday life. In: Boyt Schell BA, Gillen G, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p. 942–964.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infant Young Child. 2007;20:84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts T, Stagnitti K, Brown T, et al. Relationship between sensory processing and pretend play in typically developing children. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parham LD, Ecker C, Miller H, et al. Sensory Processing Measure. Los Angeles (CA): Western Psychological Services; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Miller Kuhaneck H, Ecker C, Parham LD, et al. Sensory Processing Measure – Preschool (SPM-P): manual. Los Angeles (CA): Western Psychological Services; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Baranek GT, David FJ, Poe MD, et al. Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:591–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan S, Schoen S, Miller L, et al. Initial studies of validity of the Sensory Processing 3-Dimensions Scale. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39:94–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer B, Coster W, Tucker C, et al. Development and content validity of the Participation and Sensory Environment Questionnaire. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2018;34:105–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorquera-Cabrera S, Romero-Ayuso D, Rodriguez-Gil G, et al. Assessment of sensory processing characteristics in children between 3 and 11 years old: a systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Sensory Profile-2 user’s manual. San Antonio (TX): Pearson; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Sensory Profile. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. The Infant Toddler Sensory Profile. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Sensory Profile School Companion user’s manual. San Antonio (TX): Harcourt Assessment; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn W. Sensory Profile Supplement user’s manual. San Antonio (TX): Harcourt Assessment; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Brown C, Dunn W. Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile manual. San Antonio (TX): Psychological Corporation; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Psimas L. Sensory Profile 2 overview: assessing sensory strengths and challenges. Paper presented at: Illinois Occupational Therapy Association Conference: Beyond Disability; 2014. Oct 23–25; Lisle (IL).
   Google Scholar
• DuBois D, Lymer E, Gibson BE, et al. Assessing sensory processing dysfunction in adults and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review. Brain Sci. 2017;7:108–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classen S, Velozo CA. Critiquing assessments. In: Boyt Schell BA, Gillen G, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p. 390–412.
   Google Scholar
• Chojnicka I, Pisula E. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Short Sensory Profile 2. Medicine. 2019;98:e17689–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean E, Dunn W. Reliability and validity of the Child Sensory Profile 2 Spanish translation. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:7211500054p1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean E, Dunn W, Little L. Validity of the Sensory Profile 2: a confirmatory factor analysis. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70:7011500075p1.
   Google Scholar
• Dean E, Dunn W, Little L, et al. Sensory processing predictors of challenging behaviour [dissertation]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Kansas; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dean E, Little L, Tomchek S, et al. Sensory processing in the general population: adaptability, resiliency, and challenging behaviour. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Lobete L, Pértega-Díaz S, Santos-Del-Riego S, et al. Sensory processing patterns in developmental coordination disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and typical development. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;100:103608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald J, Glovinsky I, Halpern E, et al. 2017. Psychometric properties of the selective mutism sensory processing questionnaire [dissertation]. Ann Arbor (MI): Fielding Graduate University. 2017 p.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan JE, Schoen S, Miller LJ. Early identification of sensory processing difficulties in high-risk infants. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73:7302205130p1–7302205130p9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudice C, Rogers EE, Johnson BC, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of sensory deficits in children with neonatal arterial ischemic stroke. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(6):667–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harb T, Frederiksen N, Hill RJ. Is sensory processing an issue for infants with colic? Infant Behav Dev. 2017;48:105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan R. 2016. Between urge and empty: Exploring the effects of sensory processing differences on the attainment of continence…25th National Conference on Incontinence in association with the Urogynaecological Society of Australasia; 2016 Nov 9–12; Adelaide Convention Centre, Adelaide, South Australia. Aus NZ Cont J. 2016;22(4):101.
   Google Scholar
• Kolacz J, Raspa M, Heilman KJ, et al. Evaluating sensory processing in fragile X syndrome: psychometric analysis of the Brain Body Center Sensory Scales (BBCSS). J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48:2187–2202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto C, López B, Gandía H. Relationships between atypical sensory processing patterns, maladaptive behaviour and maternal stress in Spanish children with autism spectrum disorder. J Intell Disabil Res. 2017;61:1140–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz SE, Stevenson RA. Sensory hypersensitivity predicts repetitive behaviours in autistic and typically-developing children. Autism. 2019;23:1028–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson K, Adams D, Alston-Knox C, et al. Exploring the sensory profiles of children on the autism spectrum using the Short Sensory Profile-2 (SSP-2). J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49:2069–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson K, Paynter J, Ziegenfusz S, et al. Sensory profiles in school age children with developmental language disorder. Intl J Disabil Dev Educ. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 2].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler N, Hardwick C, Perkes IE, et al. An exploratory study into an adapted use of the alert program for tic disorder in children. Australas Psychiatry. 2019;27:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson JF, Geisinger KF, Jonson JL, editors. The twenty-first mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln (NE): Burros Center for Testing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Clinimetrics and psychometrics: two sides of the same coin. Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1146–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D. Clinimetrics vs. psychometrics: an unnecessary distinction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1142–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T, Peres L. An overview and critique of the Test of Visual Perception Skills – fourth edition (TVPS-4). Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2018;31:59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T, Peres L. A critical review of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test – fourth edition (MVPT-4). J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2018;11:229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordier R, Yu-Wei C, Speyer R, et al. Child-report measures of occupational performance: a systematic review. PLOS One. 2016;11:e0147751–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevelink SAM, Terwee CB, Banstola N, et al. Testing the psychometric properties of the Participation Scale in Eastern Nepal. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments [Internet]; [cited 2020 Sept 1]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wpcontent/uploads/COSMIN-study-designingchecklist_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN): Database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments [internet]; VUmc Amsterdam: The Online Scientist; 2005; [cited 2020 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/tools/database-systematic-reviews/.
   Google Scholar
• Auld ML, Boyd RN, Moseley GL, et al. Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: a clinimetric review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31:413–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budimirovic D, Berry-Kravis E, Erickson C, et al. Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2017;9:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordier R, Speyer R, Yu-Wei C, et al. Evaluating the psychometric quality of social skills measures: a systematic review. PLOS One. 2015;10:e0132299–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glod M, Riby D, Honey E, et al. Psychological correlates of sensory processing patterns in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Rev J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;2:199–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanratty J, Livingstone N, Robalino S, et al. Systematic review of the measurement properties of tools used to measure behaviour problems in young children with autism. PLOS One. 2015;10:e0144649–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConachie H, Parr JR, Glod M, et al. Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:1–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Kim J-H, Doma K, et al. Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires on health-related quality of life and functional health status in dysphonia: a systematic review using the COSMIN taxonomy. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:283–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) [Internet]; [cited 2020 Sept 1]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manul_version-1_feb-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley LM. Test review of the Sensory Profile Second Edition. In: Carlson JF, Geisinger KF, Jonson JL, editors. The twentieth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln (NE): Buros Institute’s Mental Measurements Yearbook; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter A. Test review of the Sensory Profile Second Edition. In: Carlson JF, Geisinger KF, Jonson JL, editors. The twentieth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln (NE): Buros Institute’s Mental Measurements Yearbook; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brown GT. Assessment, measurement, and evaluation. In: Lane SJ, Bundy AC, editors. Kids can be kids: a childhood occupation approach. Philadelphia (PA): FA Davis; 2012. 320–348 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dugas C, Simard M-N, Fombonne E, et al. Comparison of two tools to assess sensory features in children with autism spectrum disorder. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin B. A state-independent education for citizenship? Comparing beliefs and values related to civic and moral issues among students in Swedish mainstream and Steiner Waldorf schools. J Beliefs Values. 2010;31:165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson W, Jonas PM, Dimmitt E, et al. 2018. The growth and evolution of the Wauwatosa Montessori School [dissertation]. Ann Arbor (MI): Cardinal Stritch University; 2018 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rodger S, Chien C-W, Turpin M, et al. Establishing the validity and reliability of the Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised (SPEF-R) in occupational therapy practice education: a Rasch analysis. Eval Health Prof. 2016;39(1):33–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar