Danish translation, adaptation and initial validation of the clinical assessment of modes questionnaires

References

• Taylor R. A Model of the intentional relationship. In: Taylor R, editor. The intentional relationship: occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co.; 2008. p. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Palmadottir G. Client-therapist relationships: experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:394–401.
   Google Scholar
• Cole MB, McLean V. Occupational therapy in mental health therapeutic relationships re-defined. Occup Ther Ment Heal. 2003;19:33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RR, Lee SW, Kielhofner G, et al. Therapeutic use of self: a nationwide survey of practitioners’ attitudes and experiences. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation: theory and application. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. In: Townsend E, Polatajko HJ, editors. 2nd ed. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RR. Knowing ourselves as therapists: introducing the therapeutic modes. In: Taylor RR, editor. The intentional relationship: occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co.; 2008. p. 67–98.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RR, Lee SW, Kielhofner G. Practitioners’ use of interpersonal modes within the therapeutic relationship: results from a nationwide study. OTJR Occup Particip Heal. 2011;31:6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UI-Health. Intentional relationship model clearinghouse [Internet]. University of Ilinois Chicago. Available from: https://irm.ahs.uic.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Decker L, Hanse H. Kvalificer din ergoterapi Udvikling af terapeutisk stil og relation ved hjaelp af” Intentional Relationship Model”. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sampedro Pilegaard M, Sithamparanathan T, Nielsen KT, et al. Danish translation, cultural adaptation and initial validation of the self-assessment of modes questionnaire (D-SAMQ). Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(4):285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna SP. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med. 2011;9:86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• UI-Health. Intentional relationship model clearinghouse – clinical assessment of modes questionnaire – version II [Internet]. University of Ilinois Chicago. Available from: https://irm.ahs.uic.edu/irm-assessments-and-products/
   Google Scholar
• Easy-Translate. Easytranslate.dk [Internet]. Available from: https://www.easytranslate.com/da/%0A
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consulting RM. Survey xact. Online survey system. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, et al. Qualitative description-the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh M. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;HDMB 22:276–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundheds- og aeldreministeriet (Ministery of health and elderly). Act on research ethics review of health research projects [Internet]. Denmark: Bekendtgørelse om information og samtykke til deltagelse i sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter samt om anmeldelse af og tilsyn med sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter; 2020. Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2018/498
   Google Scholar
• National Videnskabsetisk Komité [National Committee on Health Research Ethics]. Hvad skal jeg anmelde? [What do I need to report]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sept 9]. Available from: https://www.nvk.dk/forsker/naar-du-anmelder/hvilke-projekter-skal-jeg-anmelde
   Google Scholar
• Ritter VC, Thørrisen MM, Yazdani F, et al. Further validation of the Norwegian self-efficacy for therapeutic mode use. Occup Ther Int. 2017;2017:9745373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall DA, Zaragoza Domingo S, Hamdache LZ, et al. A good practice guide for translating and adapting hearing-related questionnaires for different languages and cultures. Int J Audiol. 2018;57:161–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker DL, Melnikow J, Ying Ly M, et al. Translation of health surveys using mixed methods. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42:430–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnault A, Herdman M. Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. Danish organisations are flat in their structure [Internet]. Working for Denmark [cited 2018 Jun 16]. Available from: http://workingfordenmark.um.dk/en/mfa-and-you/a-multicultural-context/working-with-danes/danish-organisations-are-flat-in-their-structure/
   Google Scholar
• The Danish Goverment. Danmarks Riges Grundlov [the Constitution of Denmark]; 1953. Denmark. Available from: http://www.grundloven.dk/
   Google Scholar
• Bühlmann M, Merkel W, Müller L. New democracy barometer shows how democratic the thirty best democracies are. NCCR Democr Newsl. 2011;2:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bühlmann M, Merkel W, Müller L, et al. The democracy barometer: a new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. Eur Polit Sci. 2012;11:519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundheds- og aeldreministeriet [Ministery of Health And Eldery]. Sundhedsloven [the Health Act] [Internet]. Denmark; 2018. Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/R0710.aspx?id=199871
   Google Scholar
• Iacono VL, Symonds P, Brown DHK. Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociol Res Online. 2016;21:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar