Systematic review: Need for high-quality research on occupational therapy for children with intellectual disability

References

• Intellectual disability. Silver Spring: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD); 2021. [cited 2021 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/.
   Google Scholar
• Kela (Social Insurance Institution of Finland) statistics. Kela rehabilitation statistics 2019. [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: http://kelasto.kela.fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Autti-Rämö I, Heino P, Toikka T. Pitkään kestävät vaikeavammaisen yksilöterapiat. Helsinki: Kela; 2015 (Kela: Työpapereita 83). [cited 2021 Feb 5] Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/158621
   Google Scholar
• Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, et al. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:419–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerinen H, Kaski M, Virta L, et al. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a comprehensive study based on national registers. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007;51(Pt 9):715–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kehitysvammaisuus. Helsinki: Kehitysvammaliitto; 2016. [cited 2021 Feb 5] Available from: https://www.kehitysvammaliitto.fi/kehitysvammaisuus/.
   Google Scholar
• Yalon-Chamovitz S, Selanikyo E, Artzi N, et al. Occupational therapy and intellectual and developmental disability throughout the life cycle: position paper. Israeli J Occup Ther. 2010;19:E3–E8.
   Google Scholar
• Owen AL, Wilson RR. Unlocking the riddle of time in learning disability. J Intellect Disabil. 2006;10:9–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee RLT, Lee PH. To evaluate the effects of a simplified hand washing improvement program in schoolchildren with mild intellectual disability: a pilot study. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:3014–3025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Shields N, Imms C, et al. Participation of children with intellectual disability compared with typically developing children. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:1854–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson K, Gibson BE, Leplege A. Rethinking rehabilitation: theory, practice, history—and the future. In: McPherson K, Gibson BE, Leplege A, editors. Rethinking rehabilitation. Theory and Practice Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. p. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in health systems. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2017. [cited 2021 Feb 5] Available from: https://www.who.int/rehabilitation/rehabilitation_health_systems/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerful practice: a model for authentic occupational therapy. Fort Collins: Center for Innovation OT Solutions; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Leong HM, Carter M, Stephenson JR. Meta-analysis of research on sensory integration therapy for individuals with developmental and learning disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2015;27:183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton EE, Reichow B, Schnitz A, et al. A systematic review of sensory-based treatments for children with disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;37:64–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romagnoli G, Leone A, Romagnoli G, et al. Occupational therapy's efficacy in children with Asperger's syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Ter. 2019;170:e382–e387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa RTA, de Oliveira ASB, de Lima Antão JYF, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication in children with Down's syndrome: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman-Levi A, Golisz K, Swierat RP, et al. Scoping review: interventions that promote functional performance for adolescents and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:458–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frolek Clark GJ, Schlabach TL. Systematic review of occupational therapy interventions to improve cognitive development in children ages birth-5 years. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67:425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, et al. Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromatis E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Adelaide, Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Moola S, Liberati A, Tufanaru C, et al. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromatis E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Adelaide, Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, et al. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group; 2013. [cited 2021 Feb 5] Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale J, Casey J, Porter-Armstrong A. Effectiveness of training on the community skills of children with intellectual disabilities. Scand J Occup Ther. 2008;15:247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuang YP, Ho GS, Su CY. Occupational therapy home program for children with intellectual disabilities: a randomized, controlled trial. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:528–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Ahlström SW, Granlund M. Intervention in time-processing ability, daily time management and autonomy in children with intellectual disabilities aged 10–17 years – a cluster randomised trial. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:110–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selanikyo E, Weintraub N, Yalon-Chamovitz S. Effectiveness of the Co-PID for students with moderate intellectual disability. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:7202205090p1–7202205090p10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selanikyo E, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weintraub N. Enhancing classroom participation of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Can J Occup Ther. 2017;84:76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella-Malone H, Fleming C, Chung Y, et al. Teaching daily living skills to seven individuals with severe intellectual disabilities: a comparison of video prompting to video modeling. J Posit Behav Interv. 2011;13:144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Cannella-Malone H, Wheaton JE, et al. Using video prompting with different fading procedures to teach daily living skills: a preliminary examination. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2016;31:129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhale P, Solanki PV, Agarwal P. To study the effectiveness of play based therapy on play behaviour of children with Down’s syndrome. Indian J Occup Ther. 2014;46:41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Patton S, Hutton E. Exploring the participation of children with Down syndrome in handwriting without tears. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2017;10:171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen KD, Vatland C, Bowen SL, et al. An evaluation of parent-produced video self-modeling to improve independence in an adolescent with intellectual developmental disorder and an autism spectrum disorder: a controlled case study. Behav Modif. 2015;39:542–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burckley E, Tincani M, Guld Fisher A. An iPad™-based picture and video activity schedule increases community shopping skills of a young adult with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Dev Neurorehabil. 2015;18:131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills C, Chapparo C. Use of perceive, recall, plan, perform stage two cognitive task analysis for students with autism and intellectual disability: the impact of a sensory activity schedule. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2017;10:232–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills C, Chapparo C, Hinitt J. The impact of an in-class sensory activity schedule on task performance of children with autism and intellectual disability: a pilot study. BR J Occup Ther. 2016;79:530–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner SJ, Wolfe PS. Teaching students with developmental disabilities daily living skills using point-of-view modeling plus video prompting with error correction. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2015;30:195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor C, Stagnitti K. Play, behaviour, language and social skills: the comparison of a play and a non-play intervention within a specialist school setting. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1205–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton T, Plattner L. Occupational therapy role in school-based practice: perspectives from teachers and OTs. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2020;13:136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill SM, Beisbier S. Occupational therapy practice guidelines for children and youth ages 5–21 years. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:7404397010p1–7404397010p48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandisson M, Tetreault S, Freeman AR. Enabling integration in sports for adolescents with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2012;25:217–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak I, Honan I. Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: a systematic review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:258–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton Y, Roe S. Occupational therapy home programmes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy using bimanual and modified constraint induced movement therapies: a critical review. *Brit J Occup Ther. 2017;80:337–349.
   Google Scholar
• Walker BJ, Washington L, Early D, et al. Parents' experiences with implementing therapy home programs for children with Down syndrome: a scoping review. Occup Ther Health Care. 2020;34:85–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell WN, Missiuna CA, Rivard LM, et al. “Support for everyone”: experiences of occupational therapists delivering a new model of school-based service. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missiuna CA, Pollock NA, Levac DE, et al. Partnering for change: an innovative school-based occupational therapy service delivery model for children with developmental coordination disorder. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaelin VC, Ray-Kaeser S, Moioli S, et al. Occupational therapy practice in mainstream schools: results from an online survey in Switzerland. Occup Ther Int. 2019;2019:3647397. eCollection 2019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maciver D, Rutherford M, Arakelyan S, et al. Participation of children with disabilities in school: a realist systematic review of psychosocial and environmental factors. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Bouck E, Duenas A. The effect of video modeling and video prompting interventions on individuals with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. J Spec Educ Technol. 2019;34:3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg B, Kjellberg A. Participation when using cognitive assistive devices-from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2010;17:168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch H, Moore A. Play as an occupation in occupational therapy. Brit J Occup Ther. 2016;79:519–520.
   Google Scholar
• Miller Kuhaneck H, Tanta KJ, Coombs AK, et al. A survey of pediatric occupational therapists' use of play. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2013;6:213–227.
   Google Scholar
• Moore A, Lynch H. Accessibility and usability of playground environments for children under 12: a scoping review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:331–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romli MH, Wan Yunus F. A systematic review on clinimetric properties of play instruments for occupational therapy practice. Occup Ther Int. 2020;2020:2490519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaForme Fiss AC, Effgen SK, Page J, et al. Effect of sensorimtor groups on gross motor acquisition for young children with down syndrome. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009;21:158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpster K, Sheehan A, Foster EA, et al. The methodological application of goal attainment scaling in pediatric rehabilitation research: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:2855–2864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L. Goal setting in paediatric rehabilitation. In: Siegert RJ, Levack W, editors. Rehabilitation goal setting. Theory, practice and evidence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis; 2015. p. 291–304.
   Google Scholar
• Stagnitti K. Child-initiated pretend play assessment (ChIPPA). Manual and kit. Melbourne, Australia: Co-ordinates Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo JW, Sutton-Smith B, Coolahan K, et al. Assessment of play interaction behaviours in young low-income children: Penn interactive peer play scale. Early Child Res Q. 1995;10:105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison H, Kielhofner G. Examining reliability and validity of the preschool play scale with handicapped children. Am J Occup Ther. 1986;40:167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster WJ. Making the best match: selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67:162–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottorp A, Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003;47(Pt 8):597–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gantschnig BE, Fisher AG, Page J, et al. Differences in activities of daily living (ADL) abilities of children across world regions: a validity study of the assessment of motor and process skills. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41:230–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Granlund M, Alderman I, et al. Development of a new assessment of time processing ability in children, using rasch analysis. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34:771–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Introducing GRADE: a systematic approach to rating evidence in systematic reviews and to guideline development. KT Update. Austin (TX): SEDL, Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Goy E, Kansagara D, Freeman M. A systematic evidence review of interventions for non-professional caregivers of individuals with dementia. Appendix B quality rating criteria for systematic reviews. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shorten A, Smith J. Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base. Evid Based Nurs. 2017;20:74–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar