Information and communication technology to improve school participation among upper secondary school students with special educational needs

References

• United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the rights of the child. New York: UN; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning. Disability and Health: ICF: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: UNESCO Paris; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood G, Croll P. Truancy and well-being among secondary school pupils in England. Educ Stud. 2015;41:14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havik T, Bru E, Ertesvåg SK. Assessing reasons for school non-attendance. Scand J Edu Res. 2015;59:316–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder CLM, Cantrell MA. Childhood disability and educational outcomes: a systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;45:37–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen AM, Holopainen LK, Savolainen HK. A five-year follow-up on the role of educational support in preventing dropout from upper secondary education in Finland. J Learn Disabil. 2015;48:408–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Education at a glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Skollag (SFS 2010: 800) [Education Act (2010: 800)]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Yngve M, Lidström H, Ekbladh E, et al. Which students need accommodations the most, and to what extent are their needs met by regular upper secondary school? A cross-sectional study among students with special educational needs. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2019;34:327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolic Baric V, Hellberg K, Kjellberg A, et al. Support for learning goes beyond academic support: voices of students with Asperger’s disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Autism. 2016;20:183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echsel A, Price L, Josephsson S, et al. “Together on the way”: occupational therapy in mainstream education – a narrative study of emerging practice in Switzerland. Occup Ther Int. 2019;2019:7464607.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anaby DR, Campbell WN, Missiuna C, et al. Recommended practices to organize and deliver school-based services for children with disabilities: a scoping review. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45:15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaby DR, Ianni L, Héguy L, et al. Actual and ideal roles of school staff to support students with special needs: current needs and strategies for improvement. Support Learn. 2020;35:326–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaelin VC, Ray-Kaeser S, Moioli S, et al. Occupational therapy practice in mainstream schools: results from an online survey in Switzerland. Occup Ther Int. 2019;2019:3647397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Donoghue C, O'Leary J, Lynch H. Occupational therapy services in School-Based practice: a pediatric occupational therapy perspective from Ireland. Occup Ther Int. 2021;2021:6636478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajo LC, Candler C, Sarafian A. Interventions within the scope of occupational therapy to improve Children’s Academic Participation: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. Institute for Statistics Glossary. 2019 [cited 2021 Oct 16]. Available from: http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/information-and-communication-technologies-ict
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE) World Health Organization. 2019 [cited 2021 Oct 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/en/
   Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Hemmingsson H. Benefits of the use of ICT in school activities by students with motor, speech, visual, and hearing impairment: a literature review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:251–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight L. The case for mobile devices as assistive learning technologies: a literature review. Hum-Comput Interact. 2016;2016:1102–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Perelmutter B, McGregor KK, Gordon KR. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2017;114:139–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istenic Starcic A, Bagon S. ICT‐supported learning for inclusion of people with special needs: review of seven educational technology journals, 1970–2011. Br J Educ Technol. 2014;45:202–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Limbrick L. A review of the use of touch-screen mobile devices by people with developmental disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:3777–3791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson AH, Ito M, Smith RO, et al. Effect of assistive technology in a public school setting. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. ‘Participation’: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, et al. School participation, supports and barriers of students with and without disabilities. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39:535–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilson ST, Traustadottir R. Participation of students with physical disabilities in the school environment. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:264–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin S, Kara ÖK, Köse B, et al. Investigation on participation, supports and barriers of children with specific learning disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;101:103639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen J, Linnanmäki K, Aunio P. Learning difficulties, academic well-being and educational dropout: a person-centred approach. Learn Individ Differ. 2014;31:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen A, Holopainen L, Savolainen H. Mathematical and reading difficulties as predictors of school achievement and transition to secondary education. Scand J Edu Res. 2013;57:488–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de las Heras de Pablo C-G, Parkinson S, Pépin G, et al. Intervention process: enabling occupational change. In: Taylor R, editor. Kielhofner's model of human occupation. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Egilson S, Lidström H, et al. The school setting interview: SSI version 3.1. Stockholm: FSA; förlagsservice; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boman A. Vägar till arbete – slutrapport [Roads to Employment – Final Report]. Sundbyberg: Myndigheten för delaktighet; 2014. Report No.: 14310.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin E, Lagerkrans E. Teknikstöd i skolan – Slutrapport [Technological support in school – Final Report]. Hjälpmedelsinstitutet [Swedish Institute of Assistive Technology, SIAT]; 2013. Report No.: 13341.
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council (MRC). Developing and evaluating complex interventions. 2019. Availible from: https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/
   Google Scholar
• Gearing RE, El-Bassel N, Ghesquiere A, et al. Major ingredients of fidelity: a review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementation. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Borell L. The development of an assessment of adjustment needs in the school setting for use with physically disabled students. Scand J Occup Ther. 1996;3:156–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Kottorp A, Bernspång B. Validity of the school setting interview: an assessment of the student–environment fit. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;11:171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Yngve M, Munkholm M, Lidström H, et al. Validity of the school setting interview for students with special educational needs in regular high school – a Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM2030 software and manuals. Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Thompson AJ. Effect sizes can be misleading: is it time to change the way we measure change? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1044–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÓNeill B, Gillespie A. Assistive technology for cognition a handbook for clinicians and developers. Evans J, editor. London: Psychology Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood G, Croll P. Truancy in secondary school pupils: prevalence, trajectories and pupil perspectives. Res Pap Educ. 2006;21:467–484.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education (SNAE). Frånvaro och närvaro i gymnasieskolan – en nationell kartläggning [School absence and attendance in upper secondary school – a national survey]. Stockholm; 2014. Report No.: 416.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R. Kielhofner’s Model of Human Occupation: theory and application. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Credé M, Roch SG, Kieszczynka UM. Class attendance in college: a meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Rev Educ Res. 2010;80:272–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SNAE. Betyg och studieresultat i gymnasieskolan år 2016 [Grades and study results in upper secondary education year 2016]. Vuxenutbildningsstatistik Efg-o; 2016. Dnr: 2016:01505.
   Google Scholar
• Båtevik FO. From school to work: long-term employment outcomes for former special educational needs students. Scand J Disabil Res. 2019;21:595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shandra CL, Hogan DP. The educational attainment process among adolescents with disabilities and children of parents with disabilities. Intl J Disabil Dev Educ. 2009;56:363–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondoc S, Goodrich B. Assistive technology and occupational performance. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70:1-B.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Lidström H, Nygård L. Use of assistive technology devices in mainstream schools: students’ perspective. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist L, Danielsson H. Parents act as intermediary users for their children when using assistive technology for cognition in everyday planning: results from a parental survey. Assist Technol. 2020;32:194–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk EM, Bonis PA, Moskowitz H, et al. Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Jama. 2002;287:2973–2982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar