Validity and reliability of the Occupational Experience Profile

References

• Hunt E, McKay E. A scoping review of time-use research in occupational therapy and occupational science. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlan JN, Bundy A. Development and validation of the modified occupational questionnaire. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smith NR, Kielhofner G, Watts JH. The relationships between volition, activity pattern, and life satisfaction in the elderly. Am J Occup Ther. 1986;40:278–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atler KE, Berg B. Occupational experience profile (OEP): user manual. Fort Collins (CO): Colorado State University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Atler KE. The daily experiences of pleasure, productivity and restoration profile: a measure of subjective experiences. In: Pierce D, editor. Occupational science for occupational therapy. Thorofare (NH): Slack; 2014. p. 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Atler KE. An argument for a dynamic interrelated view of occupational experience. J Occup Sci. 2015;22:249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg B, Atler K, Fisher AG. Constructing an outcome measure of occupational experience: an application of rasch measurement methods. J Appl Meas. 2017;18:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atler K. User-perceived utility of the daily experiences of pleasure, productivity, and restoration profile. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82:235–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atler KE, Barney L, Moravec A, et al. The daily experiences of pleasure, productivity, and restoration profile: a case study: étude de cas sur l’utilité du daily experiences of pleasure, productivity, and restoration profile. Can J Occup Ther. 2017;84:262–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atler KE, Fox AL. Mental health consumers’ perspectives on using an occupation-focused assessment to initiate change in everyday activities. Br J Occup Ther. 2020;84:497–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Self-care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories”. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerful practice: a model for authentic occupational therapy. Fort Collins (CO): Center for Innovative OT Solutions; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Gershuny J. MUTS coding procedures (release 3) [Internet]. Oxford (UK): University of Oxford; 2016 [cited 2016 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.timeuse.org/sites/default/files/9727/mtus-coding-procedures.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Facets (Version 3.83) [Computer Software]. Beaverton (OR): Winsteps.com; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. FACETS rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Beaverton (OR): Winsteps.com; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.
   Google Scholar
• Stone MH, Wright BD. Maximizing rating scale information. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:386.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W-H, Lenderking W, Jin Y, et al. Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:485–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Winsteps® (Version 4.4.7) [Computer Software]. Beaverton (OR): Winsteps.com; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 14]. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Winsteps^® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Beaverton (OR): Winsteps.com; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. PCA: data variance: explained, modeled and empirical. Rasch Meas Trans. 2003;17:942–943.
   Google Scholar
• Raîche G. Critical eigenvalue sizes (variance) in standardized residual principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch Meas Trans. 2005;19:1012.
   Google Scholar
• Haertel EH. Reliability. In: Brennan RL, editor. Educational measurement. 4th ed. Westport (CT): American Council on Education; 2006. p. 65–111.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher WP. The cash value of reliability. Rasch Meas Trans. 2008;22:1160–1163.
   Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Tao W, Norweg A, et al. Interpreting rehabilitation outcome measurements. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:585–590. https://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care. 2004;42:I37–I48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis H, O’Keefe S, Lane R. Fun is more fun when others are involved. J Posit Psychol. 2017;12:547–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothby E, Clark M, Bargh J. Shared experiences are amplified. Psychol Sci. 2014;25:2209–2216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke C, Stack C, Martin M. Lack of meaningful activity on acute physical hosptial wards: older people’s experiences. Br J Occup Ther. 2018;81:15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Sadlo G, Stew G. Rethinking occupational deprivation and boredom. J Occup Sci. 2012;19:54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull. 2005;131:803–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth C. Measuring the outcome of occupational thearpy: tools and resources. Aust Occ Ther J. 2000;47:147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Asaba E, Nakamura M, Asaba A, et al. Integrating occupational therapy specific assessments in practice: exploring practitioner experiences. Occup Ther Int. 2017;2017:7602805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Jones KB. Assessment of motor and process skills: development, standardization, and administration manual. 7th ed. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Jones KB. Assessment of motor and process skills: user manual. 8th ed. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson LK. Coaching for learning: supporting health through self-occupational-analysis and revisions of daily occupations. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2012;65:52–56.
   Google Scholar