Occupational multi-level responsiveness: Describing the skills used by occupational therapists working with children seeking asylum in Australia

References

• Howlett F, Spring H. ‘Like hope in a dark room’: engaging refugees and asylum seekers in meaningful activity. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82:84.
   Google Scholar
• Smith HC. An exploration of the meaning of occupation to people who seek asylum in the United Kingdom. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78:614–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimboli C, Halliwell V. A survey to explore the interventions used by occupational therapists and occupational therapy students with refugees and asylum seekers. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2018;74:106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell E. National inquiry into children in detention, 2014. Australia: Occupational Therapy Australia; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• De Koker R, Lambers S, Vercruysse L. Occupational therapy at ‘klein kasteeltje’ in brussels for children of asylum seekers who cannot participate in the belgian schooling system. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2019;75:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Children’s Fund. Data brief: Children on the move [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 06]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Data-brief-children-on-the-move-key-facts-and-figures-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Children’s Fund. Child displacement [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 July 06]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-migration-and-displacement/displacement/
   Google Scholar
• Nowak M. Report of the independent expert leading the United Nations global study on children deprived of liberty. Switzerland: United Nations General Assembly; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell EJ, Steel EJ. Mental distress and human rights of asylum seekers. J Public Ment Health. 2015;14:43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford E, Turpin M, Nayar S, et al. The structural-personal interaction: occupational deprivation and asylum seekers in Australia. J Occup Sci. 2016;23:321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne J, Lowrie D, Wilson J. Occupational experiences of refugees and asylum seekers resettling in Australia: a narrative review. OTJR. 2016;36:204–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morville AL, Amris K, Eklund M, et al. A longitudinal study of changes in asylum seekers ability regarding activities of daily living during their stay in the asylum center. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17:852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morville A-L, Jessen-Winge C. Creating a bridge: an asylum seeker’s ideas for social inclusion. J Occup Sci. 2019;26:53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Gibson BE, Rappolt S. Occupational justice: a conceptual review. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:418–430.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Human Rights Commission. The forgotten children: national inquiry into children in immigration detention. Sydney (Australia): Australian Human Rights Commission; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mares S, Zwi K. Sadness and fear: the experiences of children and families in remote Australian immigration detention. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51:663–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huot S, Kelly E, Park SJ. Occupational experiences of forced migrants: a scoping review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63:186–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman DL. Embracing and enacting an ‘occupational imagination’: occupational science as transformative. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:373–388.
   Google Scholar
• Turner A, Alsop A. Unique core skills: exploring occupational therapists’ hidden assets. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78:739–749.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Beagan B, Kumas-Tan Z, et al. Enabling: occupational therapy’s core competency. In: Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Position Statement on Occupational Therapy and Human Rights [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2021 Jul 06]. Available from: https://www.wfot.org/resources/occupational-therapy-and-human-rights.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin M, Iwama MK. Using occupational therapy models in practice E-Book: a field guide. Edinburgh (UK): Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk R, Phillips J, Sapeta S, et al. The Canadian model of client-centred enablement: reflections from diverse occupational therapy practitioners. Occup Ther Now. 2009;26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Refugee Council of Australia. Where are people detained in Australia? [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/getfacts/seekingsafety/asylum/detention/map/
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pitonyak JS, Mroz TM, Fogelberg D. Expanding client-centred thinking to include social determinants: a practical scenario based on the occupation of breastfeeding. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson I, Townsend E. Occupational justice-bridging theory and practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome K. Age-friendly buses: development, evaluation and occupational therapy theory. Queensland (Australia): The University of Queensland; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Simó Algado S, Ann Townsend E. Eco-social occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78:182–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Malfitano APS, de Souza R, Townsend EA, et al. Do occupational justice concepts inform occupational therapists’ practice? A scoping review. Can J Occup Ther. 2019;86:299–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. AOTA 2020 occupational therapy code of ethics. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:7413410005p1–7413410005p13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Occupational Therapy Board of Australia. Australian occupational therapy competency standards. Australia: Occupational Therapy Board of Australia; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Professional standards for occupational therapy practice, conduct and ethics. London: Royal College of Occupational Therapists; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Minimum Standards for the Education of Occupational Therapists [Internet]. World Federation of Occupational Therapists; 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 06]. Available from: https://wfot.org/resources/new-minimum-standards-for-the-education-of-occupational-therapists-2016-e-copy#
   Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Craik J, Davis J, et al. Canadian practice process framework. In: Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottawa (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy Publications ACE; 2007. p. 233.
   Google Scholar
• Restall GJ, MacLeod Schroeder NJ, Dubé CD. The equity lens for occupational therapy: a program development and evaluation tool: L'Equity Lens for Occupational Therapy: un outil pour le développement et l'évaluation de programme. Can J Occup Ther. 2018;85:185–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leclair LL, Lauckner H, Yamamoto C. An occupational therapy community development practice process. Can J Occup Ther. 2019;86:345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh F. Applying a family resilience framework in training, practice, and research: mastering the art of the possible. Fam Process. 2016;55:616–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland JS, Emanuel LL, Torke AM. Applying a family systems lens to proxy decision making in clinical practice and research. Fam Syst Health. 2017;35:7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford E. Continuing the dialogue: a rights-approach in occupational therapy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017;64:505–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• OT Seeker. Occupational THerapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence: Intervention Category; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton E, Carr A. Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures. Fam Process. 2016;55:16–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter C, Pride T. Critiquing the Canadian model of Client-Centered enablement (CMCE) for indigenous contexts. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KRW. Occupation, well-being, and culture: theory and cultural humility. Can J Occup Ther. 2013;80:224–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Social and structural determinants of health: exploring occupational therapy's structural (in)competence determinants sociaux et structurels de la sante: une exploration de la competence ou incompetence structurelle de l'ergotherapie. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:365–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RB. Towards inclusive occupational therapy: introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017;64:429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ, Njelesani JE, Davis JA. Explicating our core competency: a call for global research on occupational enablement. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82:208–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar