711
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Psychometric testing of the Icelandic Occupational Self-Assessment (OSA-IS)

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 771-781 | Received 01 Sep 2021, Accepted 24 Apr 2022, Published online: 19 May 2022

References

  • Baron K, Kielhofner G, Iynger A, et al. A user’s manual for the occupational self-assessment (OSA). version 2.2. Chicago (IL): University of Illinois at Chicago; 2006.
  • Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  • Law M. editor. Client-centred occupational therapy. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK; 1998.
  • Laver-Fawcett AJ. Routine standardised outcome measurement to evaluate the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions: essential or optional? Ergoterapeuten. 2014;4:28–37.
  • McColl MA, Pollock N. Measuring occupational performance using a client-centred perspective. In Law M, Baum C, Dunn W, editors. Measuring occupational performance: supporting best practices in occupational therapy. 3rd ed. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK; 2017. p. 83–94.
  • Custer MG, Huebner RA, Freudenberger L, et al. Client-chosen goals in occupational therapy: strategy and instrument pilot. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013;27:58–70.
  • Playford ED. Goal setting as shared decision making. In: Siegert RJ, Levack WMM, editors. Rehabilitation goal setting: theory, practice, and evidence. 1st ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p. 89–104.
  • Kielhofner G, Forsyth K, Kramer J, et al. Developing the occupational self-assessment: the use of Rasch analysis to assure internal validity, sensitivity, and reliability. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72:94–104.
  • Kielhofner G, Forsyth K. Measurement properties of a client self-report for treatment planning and documenting therapy outcomes. Scand J Occup Ther. 2001;8:131–139.
  • Kielhofner G, Dobria L, Forsyth K, et al. The occupational self-assessment: stability and the ability to detect change over time. OTJR. 2010;30:11–19.
  • Taylor R, Lee SW, Kramer J, et al. Psychometric study of the occupational self assessment with adolescents after infectious mononucleosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:e20–e28.
  • Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2015.
  • Arnadottir G, Fisher AG. Rasch analysis of the ADL scale of the A-ONE. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62:51–60.
  • Batcho CS, Tennant A, Thonnard JL. ACTIVLIM-stroke: a crosscultural Rasch-built scale of activity limitations in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:815–823.
  • Asgari A, Kramer JM. Construct validity and factor structure of the Persian occupational self-assessment (OSA) with Iranian students. Occup Ther Health Care. 2008;22:187–200.
  • Pan AW, Chung L, Chen TJ, et al. The study of the validity and reliability of the occupational self-assessment traditional Chinese version. HKJOT. 2020;33:1–7.
  • Murad MS, Farnworth L, O'Brien L. Reliability and validation properties of the Malaysian language version of the occupational self-assessment version 2.2 for injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74:226–232.
  • Pekçetin S, Salar S, Inal Ö, et al. Validity of the Turkish occupational self-assessment for elderly individuals. OTJR. 2018;38:105–112.
  • Petersen K, Hartvig B. A process for translating and validating model of human occupation assessments in the Danish context. Occup Ther Health Care. 2008;22:139–149.
  • Forbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter. Min mening: bedömning av kompetens och värderingar gennom självskattning [Occupational self-assessment: self report of competence and values]. Stockholm, Sweden: Author. 2012. Swedish.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Breugelmans R. Dangers in using translated medical questionnaires: the importance of conceptual equivalence across languages and cultures in patient-reported outcome measures. Chest. 2009;136:1175–1177.
  • Skulason S. Hvernig maela á hugsmíðar með erlendum maelitaekjum: þýðing og staðfaersla á spurningalistum og prófum [How to measure constructs with foreign measures: translation and adaptation of questionnaires and tests]. Tímarit um menntarannsóknir. 2005;2:69–81. Icelandic.
  • Acquadro C, Patrick DL, Eremenco S, et al. Emerging good practices for translatability assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2:8.
  • Kruger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2000.
  • Palsdottir A, Jonsdottir S. Mat á eigin iðju skjólstaeðinga. [Clients’ self report of occupation] [BSc-thesis]. Akureyri: The University of Akureyri; 2005. Icelandic.
  • Sigurðardottir M, Jonsdottir S. Study of the first three versions of OSA-IS through the years 2005-2014. (Working Paper). Iceland: Reykjalundur Rehabilitation Centre; 2015.
  • Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005.
  • Linacre JM. Winsteps® [Computer Software]. Version 4.5.2. Beaverton (OR): Winsteps.com; 2019. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/
  • Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.
  • Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, et al. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:33.
  • Linacre JM. Andrich thresholds: disordered rating or partial credit structures (categories or Andrich thresholds). n.d. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/disorder.htm
  • Linacre JM. Summary of dichotomous, rating scale or partial credit structures. n.d. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table3_2.htm
  • Linacre JM. Item principal components/contrast analysis of residuals. n.d. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/table23_2.htm
  • Linacre JM. Andrich thresholds: dimensionality: contrasts & variances. n.d. Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/principalcomponents.htm
  • Fisher WP. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. n.d. Available from: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm
  • Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM, et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stoke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
  • Fan CW, Yazdani F, Carstensen T, et al. Rasch analysis of the self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self questionnaire in Norwegian occupational therapy students. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28:274–284.
  • Keller J, Kielhofner G. Psychometric characteristics of the child occupational self-assessment (COSA), part two: refining the psychometric properties. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12:147–158.
  • Nordic Social Statistical Committee (NOSOSCO). Social protection in the Nordic countries 2015/2016: scope, expenditure and financing. Version 63. 2017. Available from: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1148493&dswid=-275
  • Lög um orlof nr. 30/1987 [Law about vacation no. 30/1987]. Iceland: Althing. Available from: https://www.althingi.is/lagas/150c/1987030.html Icelandic.
  • Fenger K. Hlutverk Íslendinga, gildi þeirra og hversu oft þeir gegna þeim [Icelanders‘roles, their values and how often they perform those roles]. Iðjuþjálfinn. 2001;23:12–20. Icelandic.
  • Olafsson S. Working nation: the mindset of the enterprising Icelanders. Nord Labour J. 2008. Available from: http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/artikler/forskning/forskning-2008/working-nation-the-mindset-of-the-enterprising-icelanders
  • Davies R, Cameron J. Self-identified occupational competencies, limitations, and priorities for change in the occupational lives of people with drug misuse problems. Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73:251–260.
  • Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1566–1574.
  • Stjórnarráð Íslands, Heilbrigðisráðuneytið [Government of Iceland, Ministry of Health]. Endurhaefing: tillögur að endurhaefingarstefnu [Rehabilitation: suggestion to rehabilitation policy]. Reykjavik: Ministry of Health; 2020. Icelandic.
  • Cordier R, Brown T, Clemson L, et al. Evaluating the longitudinal item and category stability of the SF-36 full and summary scales using Rasch analysis. BioMed Re Int. 2018. Article ID 1013453, 30 pages. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2018/1013453/#supplementary-materials
  • Babcock B, Albano AD. Rasch scale stability in the presence of item parameter and trait drift. Appl Psychol Meas. 2012;36:565–580.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.