The jigsaw puzzle of activities for mastering daily life; service recipients and professionals’ perceptions of gains and changes attributed to reablement – A qualitative meta-synthesis

References

• Aspinal F, Glasby J, Rostgaard T, et al. New horizons: reablement-supporting older people towards independence. Age Ageing. 2016;45:574–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane A, McGilloway S, Furlong M, et al. Home-care ‘re-ablement’ services for maintaining and improving older adults' functional independence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Birkeland A, Tuntland H, Førland O, et al. Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims-Gould J, Tong CE, Wallis-Mayer L, et al. Reablement, reactivation, rehabilitation and restorative interventions with older adults in receipt of home care: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18:653–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Espehaug B, et al. Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Rostgaard T, Parsons M, et al. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: a Delphi study. Ageing and Society. 2022;42:703–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons JGM, Sheridan N, Rouse P, et al. A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of a model of restorative home care on physical function and social support among older people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1015–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier A, Beaulieu M-D, Mcginn CA, et al. Effectiveness of reablement: a systematic review. Healthc Policy. 2016;11:49–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehead P, Parry R, Walker M, et al. How can occupational therapists contribute to reablement outcomes? A qualitative study. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78:55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang F, Lee Y. Social support networks and expectations for aging in place and moving. Res Aging. 2011;33:444–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford B, Mayhew E, Duarte A, et al. Outcomes of reablement and their measurement: findings from an evaluation of English reablement services. Health Soc Care Commun. 2019;27:1438–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg L, Gladman J, Drummond A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendinning C, Clarke S, Hare P, et al. Progress and problems in developing outcomes-focused social care services for older people in England. Health Soc Care Commun. 2008;16:54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen HP, Draborg E, Kristensen FB. Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making. Patient. 2011;4:143–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trappes-Lomax T, Hawton A. The user voice: older people's experiences of reablement and rehabilitation. J Integr Care. 2012;20:181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Moe A, Brataas HV. Interdisciplinary collaboration experiences in creating an everyday rehabilitation model: a pilot study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Alvsvåg H, Førland O. The relatives' voice: how do relatives experience participation in reablement? A qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Skutle O, Førland O, et al. The reablement team's voice: a qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:575–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen FA, Vik K. Health professionals’ perspectives of next of kin in the context of reablement. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:1882–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King AI, Parsons M, Robinson E. A restorative home care intervention in New Zealand: perceptions of paid caregivers. Health Soc Care Commun. 2012;20:70–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondas T, Hall EOC. A decade of metasynthesis research in health sciences: a meta-method study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2007;2:101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. “Meta-Jeopardy”: the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nurs Outlook. 2006;54(1):10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Company; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJean D, Giacomini M, Simeonov D, et al. Finding qualitative research evidence for health technology assessment. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1307–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France EF, Uny I, Ring N, et al. A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:795–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France EF, Cunningham M, Ring N, et al. Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Aust Occup Ther J. 2002;46:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hitch D, Pépin G, Stagnitti K. In the footsteps of Wilcock, part one: the evolution of doing, being, becoming, and belonging. Occup Ther Health Care. 2014;28:231–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hitch D, Pépin G, Stagnitti K. In the footsteps of Wilcock, part two: the interdependent nature of doing, being, becoming, and belonging. Occup Ther Health Care. 2014;28:247–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliassen M, Henriksen N, Moe S. The practice of support personnel, supervised by physiotherapists, in Norwegian reablement services. Physiother Res Int. 2019;24:e1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vik K. Hverdagsrehabilitering og tverrfaglig samarbeid; en empirisk studie i fire norske kommuner. TFO. 2018;4:6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jokstad K, Skovdahl K, Landmark BT, et al. Ideal and reality; community healthcare professionals' experiences of user-involvement in reablement. Health Soc Care Commun. 2019;27:907–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Tuntland H, Forland O, et al. Driving forces for home-based reablement; a qualitative study of older adults' experiences. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25:1581–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Skutle O, Alvsvag H, et al. Reablement teams' roles: a qualitative study of interdisciplinary teams' experiences. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:305–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish K, Laker S, Wright S, et al. Medicines reablement in intermediate health and social care services. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18:305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead PJ, Drummond AE, Parry RH, et al. Content and acceptability of an occupational therapy intervention in homecare re-ablement services (OTHERS). Br J Occup Ther. 2018;81:535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde A, Glendinning C. ‘If they're helping me then how can I be independent?’ The perceptions and experience of users of home-care re-ablement services. Health Soc Care Commun. 2012;20:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton E, Lewin G, Boldy D. Barriers and motivators to being physically active for older home care clients. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2013;31(1):21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Östlund G, Zander V, Elfström ML, et al. Older adults’ experiences of a reablement process. “to be treated like an adult, and ask for what I want and how I want it”. Educ Gerontol. 2019;45(8):519–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolenius K, Lamas K, Sandman P-O, et al. Perceptions of self-determination and quality of life among Swedish home care recipients–a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingmark M, Evertsson B, Haak M. The content of reablement: exploring occupational and physiotherapy interventions. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(2):122–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Partridge C, Reid F. The stroke self‐efficacy questionnaire: measuring individual confidence in functional performance after stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee CH, Baars-Elsinga A, Visser-Meily JM, et al. Responsiveness of two participation measures in an outpatient rehabilitation setting. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kjerstad E, Tuntland HK. Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar