A call to resist occupational therapy’s promotion of ableism

References

• Hammell KW. Changing institutional environments to enable occupation among people with severe physical impairments. In: Letts L, Rigby P, Stewart D, editors. Using environments to enable occupational performance. Thorofare, NJ: Slack. 2003. p. 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Deviating from the norm: a sceptical interrogation of the classificatory practices of the ICF. Brit J Occup Ther. 2004;67:408–411.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation: contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed L, Crichton A. A new definition of disability: implications for rehabilitation practice and social policy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57:32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Disability studies. In: Kielhofner G, editor Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2004. p. 238–253.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Rethinking disability and what to do about it: disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S. Infusing disability studies into the rehabilitation sciences. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack C, Collins B. Can disability studies contribute to client-centred occupational therapy? Brit J Occup Ther. 2010;73:339–342.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan SK. Constructions of disability: a call for critical reflexivity in occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:164–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalker K, Jones C. Normalization and critical disability theory. In: Jones D, Blair S, Hartery T, Jones R, editors. Sociology and occupational therapy: an integrated approach. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone1998. p. 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz DV, Antunes AAM, Furtado SRC. Tensóes e possibilidades no campo da reabilitaçáo sob a ótica dos estudos da deficiência. Cad Bras Ter Ocup. 2019;27:917–928.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison EA, Sheth AJ, Kish J, The Occupational Therapy and Disability Studies Network, et al. The occupational therapy and disability studies network. Disability studies and occupational therapy: renewing the call for change. Am J Occup Ther. 2021;75:7504170010p1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abberley P. Disabling ideology in health and welfare: the case of occupational therapy. Dis Society. 1995;10:221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abberley P. A critique of professional support and intervention. In: Swain J, French S, Barnes C, Thomas C, editors. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2004. p.239–244.
   Google Scholar
• French S, Swain J. The relationship between disabled people and health and welfare professionals. In: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage; 2001. p.734–753.
   Google Scholar
• Pooley EA, Beagan BL. The concept of oppression and occupational therapy: a critical interpretive synthesis. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc S, Kinsella EA. Toward epistemic justice: a crucially reflexive examination of ‘sanism’ and implications for knowledge generation. SSJ. 2016;10:59–78.
   Google Scholar
• LeFrançois BA. Menzies R. Reaume G. (eds) Mad matters: a critical reader in Canadian mad studies. Toronto, CA: Canadian Scholar’s Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wolframe PAM. The madwoman in the academy, or, revealing the invisible straightjacket: theorizing and teaching saneism and sane privilege. Dis Stud Quart. 2013;33:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Swain J, French S, Cameron C. Controversial issues in a disabling society. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ingstad B, Whyte SR. Disability and culture. Berkeley, CA; University of California Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Koca-Atabey M. A personal validation of the social nature of disability: different environments, different experiences. Dis Society. 2013;28:1027–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris SP, Owen R, Gould R. Parity of participation in liberal welfare states: human rights, neoliberalism, disability and employment. Dis Society. 2012;27:823–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugones M. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia. 2007;22:186–209.
   Google Scholar
• Pihama L. Colonization and the importation of ideologies of race, gender, and class in Aotearoa. In: McKinley EA, Smith LT, editors Handbook of Indigenous education. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2019. p. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Building back better: imagining an occupational therapy for a post-COVID-19 world. Aust Occ Ther J. 2021;68:444–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRuer R. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Annamma SA, Ferri BA, Connor DJ. Disability critical race theory: exploring the intersectional lineage, emergence, and potential futures of DisCrit in education. Rev Res Educ. 2018;42:46–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon EJ, Lashewicz B. Tracing and troubling continuities between ableism and colonialism in Canada. Dis Society. 2020;35:695–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy J, Uttjek M, Gibson C, et al. Yuin, Kamilaroi, Sámi, and Maori people’s reflections on experiences as 'Indigenous scholars’ in 'Disability studies’ and 'Decolonisation'. Disabil Global South. 2018;5:1344–1364.
   Google Scholar
• Grech S. Disability and the majority world: a neo-colonial approach. In: Goodley D, Hughes B, Davis L, editors. Disability and social theory: new developments and directions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 52–69.
   Google Scholar
• Grech S. Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: why colonialism matters in the disability and global South debate. Social Identities. 2015;21:6–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber B, Scherling J. The relevance of unmasking neoliberal narratives for a decolonized human rights and peace education. Int J Human Rights Ed. 2020;4:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Connell R. Southern bodies and disability: re-thinking concepts. Third World Quarterly. 2011;32:1369–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley D, Lawthom R, Runswick-Cole K. Dis/ability and austerity: beyond work and slow death. Disabil Soc. 2014;29:980–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach AJ, Teachman G, Laliberte-Rudman D, et al. Expanding beyond individualism: engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FAK. Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disabil Society. 2008;23:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LJ. Enforcing normalcy: disability, deafness and the body. New York: Verso; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley D. Dis/ability studies: theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pease B. Undoing privilege. Unearned advantage in a divided world. London: Zed; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Engagement in living: critical perspectives on occupation, rights and wellbeing. Ottawa, ONT: CAOT Publications ACE; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Miller P, Parker S, Gillinson S. Disabilism. How to tackle the last prejudice. London: Demos; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Jarus T, Bulk LY, et al. Letter to the editor. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:279–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Social and structural determinants of health: exploring occupational therapy’s structural (in)competence. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:365–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Discipline and punish. New York: Random House; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett J. Independent, proud and special: calibrating our differences. In: Barton L, Oliver M, editors. Disability studies: past, present and future. Leeds: Disability Press; 1997. p. 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Douard JW. Disability and the presence of the ‘normal. In: Toombs SK, Barnard D, Carson RA, editors. Chronic illness: from experience to policy. Bloomington, IND: Indiana University Press; 1995. p. 154–175.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer D. The categorisation and control of people with disabilities. Disabil Society. 1999;21:106–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DT, Snyder SL. The eugenic Atlantic: race, disability, and the making of an international eugenic science. Disabil Society. 2003;18:843–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosleh D. Critical disability studies with rehabilitation: re-thinking the human in rehabilitation research and practice. J Human Rehabil. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Mykitiuk R, Lemmens T. Assessing the value of a life: COVID-19 triage orders mustn’t work against those with disabilities. 2020. www.cbc.ca/news/opinion-disabled-covid-19-triage-orders-1.5532137
   Google Scholar
• Proulx L, Andersen L, Sirotich E. Are intensive care triage protocols harming the disabled? 2020. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/21/are-intensive-care-triage-protocols-harming-the-disabled/
   Google Scholar
• Thorneycroft R, Asquith NL. Unexceptional violence in exceptional times: disablist and ableist violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int journal crime. Int J Crime Just Soc Democ. 2021;10:140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandahl C. Queering the crip or cripping the queer?. In: McRuer R, Wilkerson AL, editors. Desiring disability: queer theory meets disability studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2003. P. 25–56.
   Google Scholar
• Stiker H-J. A history of disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gappmayer G. Disentangling disablism and ableism: the social norm of being able and its influence on social interactions with people with intellectual disabilities. J Occup Sci. 2021;28:102–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA. What can occupational therapy & disability studies contribute to one another? Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell DT, Snyder SL. The biopolitics of disability. University of Michigan, Ann Arbour, MI. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton L. Disabled children: challenging social exclusion. Oxford: Blackwells; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley M. Disability. A life course approach. Cambridge: Polity; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Darke P. Understanding cinematic representations of disability. In: Shakespeare T, editor. The disability reader: social science perspectives. London: Cassell; 1998. p. 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• French S. Enabling relationships in therapy practice. In: Swain J, Clark J, Parry K, French S, Reynolds F, editors. Enabling relationships in health and social care. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004. p. 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan SK, Wright V, Gibson BE. Representations of disability and normality in rehabilitation technology promotional materials. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:2072–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins PH, Bilge S. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Burgin ER. Liberation health and LGBT communities. In: Martinez DB, Fleck-Henderson A, editors. Social justice in clinical practice: a liberation health framework for social work. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 44–57.
   Google Scholar
• Visser-Meily JM, Post MW, Riphagen II, et al. Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:601–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry J. Care-need and care-receivers. Views from the margins. Womens Stud Int Forum. 1995;18:361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J. Feminism and disability. Feminist Rev. 1993;43:57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd M. The politics of disability and feminism: discord or synthesis? Sociology. 2001;35:715–728.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley J. Contradictions in caring: reciprocity and interdependence. Disabil Handicap Society. 1993;8:129–141.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattarai M, Maneewat K, Sae-Sia W. Sae-Sia W. Determinants of resilience among people who sustained spinal cord injury from the 2015 earthquake in Nepal. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munsaka E, Charnley H. “We do not have chiefs who are disabled”: disability, development and culture in a continuing complex emergency. Disabil Soc. 2013;28:756–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Swartz L. “There is nothing wrong with me”: disability and invisibility in a rural South African town. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:1799–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson J. Exploring the conceptualization of disability and demographics as “facts. In: Robertson J, Larson G, editors. Disability and social change: a progressive Canadian approach. Halifax: Fernwood; 2016. p. 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chacala A, McCormack C, Collins B, et al. “My view that disability is okay sometimes clashes”: experiences of two disabled occupational therapists. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Fänge A, Hovbrandt P, et al. Occupational therapy targeting physical environmental barriers in buildings with public facilities. Brit J Occup Ther. 2004;67:29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Praestegaard J, Ytterberg C. Discourses in stroke rehabilitation as they present themselves in current physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:223–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:491–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen J, Karppi P, Huusko TM, et al. Life situation of spinal cord-injured persons in Central Finland. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindal SM. Independence, dependence, interdependence: some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disabil Soci. 1999;14:353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín IZ, Martos JAF, Millares PM, et al. Occupational therapy culture seen through the multifocal lens of fieldwork in diverse rural areas. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:82–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaba E. Hashi-ire: where occupation, chopsticks, and mental health intersect. J Occup Science. 2008;15:74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Iwama MK. The kawa model. Culturally relevant occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Morris J. Impairment and disability: constructing an ethic of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia. 2001;16:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier M-L. Patient case formulations and oppressive disability discourses in occupational therapy education. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being & justice through occupation. 2nd ed. Ottawa, ONT: CAOT Publications ACE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison C. From leisure and disability to disability leisure: developing data, definitions and discourses. Disabil Society. 2003;18:955–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin R, Pothier D. Introduction: toward a critical theory of dis-citizenship. In: Pothier D, Devlin R, editors. Critical disability theory: essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2006. p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation. An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ONT: CAOT Publications ACE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Finger A. “Welfare reform” and us. Ragged Edge. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: a sceptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76:6–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Belonging, occupation and human well-being: an exploration. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter C, Pride T. Critiquing the Canadian model of client-centred enablement (CMCE) for indigenous contexts. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs D. Social model services: an oxymoron?. In: Barnes C, Mercer G, editors. Disability policy and practice: Applying the social model. Leeds: Disability Press; 2004. p. 144–159.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: critical reflections. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:174–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly M. Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine. Am J Occup Ther. 1962;26:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Wilcock A. Occupational justice. In: Christiansen C, Townsend E, editors. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. Thorofare, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003. p. 243–273.
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk R, Townsend E, Wilcock A. Occupational justice. In: Christiansen CH, Townsend EA, editors. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2010. p. 329–358.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA. Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: critical occupational and capabilities perspectives of justice. J Occup Science. 2012;19:8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman C, VanPuymbrouck L. Impact of occupational therapy education on students’ disability attitudes: a longitudinal study. Am J Occup Ther. 2021;75:7504180090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel B. A life in balance. New Mobility. 2004;15:29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Turcotte P-L, Holmes D. The (dis)obedient occupational therapist: a reflection on dissent against disciplinary propaganda. Cad Bras Ter Ocup. 2021;29:e2924.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. Brit J Occup Ther. 2011;74:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Said EW. Orientalism. London: Routledge. 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Seelman KD. Disability studies in education of public health and health professionals: can it work for all involved? Disabil Stud Quarterly. 2004;24:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Emery-Whittington I. Occupational justice – colonial business as usual? Indigenous observations from Aotearoa New Zealand. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery-Whittington I, Te Maro B. Decolonising occupation: causing social change to help our ancestors rest and our descendants thrive. New Zealand J Occup Ther. 2018;65:12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson C. When the river runs dry: leadership, decolonisation and healing in occupational therapy. New Zealand J Occup Ther. 2020;67:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Respecting global wisdom: enhancing the cultural relevance of occupational therapy’s theoretical base. Brit J Occup Ther. 2015;78:718–721.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Building globally relevant occupational therapy from the strength of our diversity. World Fed Occup Ther Bulletin. 2019;75:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Miller WC, Forwell S, et al. Sharing the agenda: pondering the politics and practices of occupational therapy research. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez CMV. South occupational therapies: a proposal for your understanding. Cad Bras Ter Ocup. 2019;27:671–680.
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo E. Healing work: intersections for decoloniality. World Fed Occup Ther Bulletin. 2018;74:83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Thiong’o N w. Decolonising the mind: the politics of language in African literature. London: Heinemann; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson M. In the end “the hope of decolonisation. In: McKinley EA, Smith LT, editors. Handbook of Indigenous education. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dudgeon P, Walker R. Decolonising Australian psychology: discourses, strategies, and practice. J Soc Polit Psych. 2015;3:276–297.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson R. Two-Spirit identity in a time of gender fluidity. J Homosex. 2020;67:1675–1690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal A. Gendered bodies: the case of the “third gender” in India. Contributions Indian Sociol. 1997;31:273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett NH, Vasey PL. A retrospective study of childhood gender-atypical behaviour in Samoan fa’afafine. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35:659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnartt S. Using role theory to describe disability. Res Soc Sci Disabil. 2001;2:53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan GN. Between xx and xy: intersexuality and the myth of two sexes. Chicago: Chicago Review Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Roughgarden J. Evolution’s rainbow: diversity, gender and sexuality in nature and in people. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• hooks b. Talking back. Thinking feminist; thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan I. Oxford dictionary of critical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg MJ. On evidence and evidence-based medicine: lessons from the philosophy of science. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2621–2632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchloe JL, McLaren P. Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005. p. 303–342.
   Google Scholar