Working environment, work engagement and mental health problems among occupational and physical therapists

References

• van der Noordt M, IJzelenberg H, Droomers M, et al. Health effects of employment: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(10):730–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torp S, Reiersen J. Globalization, work, and health: a nordic perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7661. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1948. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available at http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Torp S, Vinje HF. Is workplace health promotion in the nordic countries really on the right track? Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(Suppl. 15):74–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Salanova M. Work engagement: an emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In: Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP, editors. Research in social issues in management (volume 5): managing social and ethical issues in organizations. Greenwich: information Age Publishers; 2007. p. 135–177.
   Google Scholar
• Torp S. Hva er helsefremmende arbeidsplasser – og hvordan skapes det? [What are healthy workplaces – and how can they be created?] Soc Med Tidskr. 2013;90(6):768–779.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova M, Schaufeli WB, Xanthopoulou D, et al. The spiral of resources and work engagement: sustaining a positive worklife. In: Bakker AB, Leiter M, editors. Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: psychology Press; 2010. p. 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• Torp S, Grimsmo A, Hagen S, et al. Work engagement: a practical measure for workplace health promotion? Health Promot Int. 2013;28(3):387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: state of the art. J Manage Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–328.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J. Organiz. Behav. 2004;25(3):293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauno S, Kinnunen U, Ruokolainen M. Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: a longitudinal study. J Vocat Behav. 2007;70(1):149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Samuelsson K. High job demands and lack of time: a future challenge in occupational therapy. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(6):421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Occupational Health in Norway. Faktabok om arbeidsmiljø og helse 2021. Status og utviklingstrekk [Fact book about working environment and health 2021. Status og trends]. Oslo: national Institute of Occupational Health in Norway; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lexèn A, Kahlin I, Erlandsson LK, et al. Occupational health among swedish occupational therapists: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3379. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Paterson ML, Lysaght RM, et al. Experiences of burnout and coping strategies utilized by occupational therapists. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79(2):86–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C, McKenna K, King R. Sources of stress experienced by occupational therapists and social workers in mental health settings. Occup Ther Int. 2005;12(2):81–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statistics Norway. Naeringsfordeling blant sysselsatte med helse- og sosialfaglig utdanning [distribution of employees with a degree within health and social work]. Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway; 2022. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available at https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/07941.
   Google Scholar
• University of Oslo. Nettskjema [Internet form]. Oslo: University of Oslo; 2022. [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available at https://nettskjema.no.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsmo A, Torp S. Videreutvikling av Statoil-Hydros kartleggingsverktøy for helsefremmende arbeidsplasser [A developed version of the Statoil-Hydro survey for health-promoting workplaces]. Tønsberg: Vestfold University College; 2009. Report 2009/4.
   Google Scholar
• Midje HH, Nafstad IT, Syse J, et al. Workaholism and mental health problems among municipal Middle managers in Norway. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(10):1042–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, et al. The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ): a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;2005;31(6):438–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theorell T. Working conditions and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WBBakker Ab. Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP, editors. Work engagement. A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press; 2010. p. 10–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Beyond baron and kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. The process macro for SPSS. 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available at https://www.processmacro.org/download.html
   Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen T, Nerdrum P, Ostertun Geirdal A. Psychological distress and its associations with psychosocial work environment factors in four professional groups: a cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci. 2021;23(3):698–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardsen AM, Martinussen M. Hva skal til for å øke arbeidsglede og motivasjon? En undersøkelse av jobbengasjement i helse- og omsorgsyrker [How to increase work engagement and motivation. A survey of health professionals in Norway]. Psykologitidsskriftet. 2008;45(3):249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken B, Torp S. Work engagement and health among industrial workers. Scand J Organ Psychol. 2012;4(1):4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen S. Jobbengasjement som positiv faktor i den helsefremmende prosessen på arbeidsplassen – en kvantitativ studie av ingeniørers jobbengasjement [Work engagement as a positive factor for health promoting processes at work – a quantitative study on the work engagement of engineers]. Tønsberg: Vestfold University College; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. Pasienter på sykehus [Inpatients]. Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway. 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 14]. Available at https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10261/tableViewLayout1/
   Google Scholar
• Eiring Ø, Pedersen SM, Borgen K, et al. Prosedyrearbeid - meningsløst mangfold? [Clinical procedures - meaningless diversity?]. Oslo: Kunnskapssenteret; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford ER, LePine JA, Rich BL. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(5):834–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien KE, Beehr TA. So far, so good: up to now, the challenge–hindrance framework describes a practical and accurate distinction. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(8):962–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen AA, Meredith P, Khan A, et al. Burnout and work engagement in occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77(3):156–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet. Lov om arbeidsmiljø, arbeidstid og stillingsvern mv. (arbeidsmiljøloven) [The working environment act]. Oslo: ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad IT, Midje HH, Torp S, et al. Arbeidsmiljøets betydning for jobbengasjement og helse blant mellomledere i kommunal sektor [How the working environment affects work engagement and health among middle managers in municipalities]. Magma. 2015;11(2):21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Theorell T, Hasselhorn HM. On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health – are they reliable? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(7):517–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway J. Method variance and method bias in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Rogelberg S, editor. Handbook of research methods in organizational psychology. Malden: blackwell; 2002. p. 344–365.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the beahvioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen A, Tufte PA, Christoffersen L. Samfunnsvitenskapelig metode [Research methods in social science]. Oslo: Abstract Forlag; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Søgaard A, Selmer R, Bjertnes E, et al. The Oslo health study: the impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health. 2004;3(1):3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar