600
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Understanding occupation in Canada: Recent graduates’ perspectives

, , &
Pages 488-496 | Received 05 Jul 2022, Accepted 24 Jan 2023, Published online: 31 Jan 2023

References

  • Wilcock AA. Development of a personal, professional and educational occupational philosophy: an Australian perspective. Occup Ther Int. 2000;7:79–86.
  • Njelesani J, Tang A, Jonsson H, et al. Articulating an occupational perspective. J Occup Sci. 2014;21:226–235.
  • Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. 2nd ed. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2013.
  • Dunlop WJ. A brief history of occupational therapy. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 1933;1:6–10.
  • Turner A, Knight J. A debate on the professional identity of occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78(11):664–673.
  • Fisher AG. Why is it so hard to practise as an occupational therapist? Aust Occ Ther J. 2003;50:193–194.
  • Fortune T. Occupational therapists: is our therapy truly occupational or are we merely filling gaps? Br J Occup Ther. 2000;63:225–230.
  • Adams K, Hean S, Sturgis P, et al. Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first‐year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care. 2006;5:55–68.
  • Aiken FE, Fourt AM, Cheng IKS, et al. The meaning gap in occupational therapy: finding meaning in our own occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:294–302.
  • Edwards H, Dirette D. The relationship between professional identity and burnout among occupational therapists. Occup Ther Health Care. 2010;24:119–129.
  • Hooper B, Mitcham MD, Taff SD, et al. Energizing occupation as the center of teaching and learning. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2015;69(Supplement_2):6912360010p1–6912360010p5.
  • Yerxa EJ. Occupation: the keystone of a curriculum for a self-defined profession. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:365–372.
  • Sabari JS. Professional socialization: implications for occupational therapy education. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39:96–102.
  • World federation of occupational therapists. 2016. Available from: https://www.wfot.org/assets/resources/COPYRIGHTED-World-Federation-of-Occupational-Therapists-Minimum-Standards-for-the-Education-of-Occupational-Therapists-2016a.pdf
  • Hooper B. Beyond active learning: a case study of teaching practices in an occupation-centered curriculum. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60:551–562.
  • Krishnagiri S, Hooper B, Price P, et al. Explicit or hidden? Exploring how occupation is taught in occupational therapy curricula in the United States. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71:7102230020p1–7102230020p9.
  • Di Tommaso A, Wicks A, Scarvell J, et al. Uncovering educator perspectives of occupation‐centred education in Australia: a qualitative study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66:174–182.
  • Ashby SE, Adler J, Herbert L. An exploratory international study into occupational therapy students’ perceptions of professional identity. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63:233–243.
  • Towns E, Ashby S. The influence of practice educators on occupational therapy students’ understanding of the practical applications of theoretical knowledge: a phenomenological study into student experiences of practice education. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61:344–352.
  • Ivarsson AB, Müllersdorf M. Occupation as described by occupational therapy students in Sweden: a follow-up study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16:57–64.
  • Cho E, Osenga M, Forwell S, et al. Understanding occupation as situated in occupational therapy curriculum: learners’ perspectives. Paper presented at Society for the Science of Occupation: USA 2021 Conference. 2021.
  • Carpenter CM, Suto M. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
  • Rapport F. Hermeneutic phenomenology: the science of interpretation of texts. In: Holloway I, editor. Qualitative research in health care. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. p. 125–146.
  • Silverman D. Beginning research. Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1993.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res. Psychol. 2020;18:328–352.
  • Harvey L. Beyond member-checking: a dialogic approach to the research interview. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 2015;38:23–38.
  • Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, et al. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–1811.
  • Polatajko HJ, Townsend EA, Craik J, et al. Canadian model of occupational performance and engagement (CMOP-E). In: Townsend EA, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision of health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2007. p. 22–36.
  • Wilcock A. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Can J Occup Ther. 1998;65:248–256.
  • Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002.
  • Emery-Washington IG. Occupational justice - colonial business as usual? Indigenous observations from aotearoa New Zealand. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88:153–162.
  • Johnson K, Lavalley R. From racialized think-pieces toward anti-racist praxis in our science, education, and practice. J Occup Sci. 2020;28:404–409.
  • Pollard N, Block P. Who occupies disability? Braz J Occup Ther. 2017;25:417–426.
  • Molineux M. Standing firm on shifting sands. N Z J Occup Ther. 2011;58:21–28.
  • Wilding C, Whiteford G. Language, identity and representation: occupation and occupational therapy in acute settings. Aust Occup Ther J. 2008;55:180–187.
  • Ashby SE, Ryan S, Gray M, et al. Factors that influence the professional resilience of occupational therapists in mental health practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:110–119.
  • Ford E, Tommaso D, Gustafsson A, et al. M. Describing the occupational nature of practice: a scoping review. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29:353–362.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.