Occupation as means and ends in paediatric occupational therapy – A systematic review

References

• Lamb AJ. The power of authenticity. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70:7006130010p7006130011–7006130010p7006130018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombly CA. Occupation: purposefulness and meaningfulness as therapeutic mechanisms. 1995 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49:960–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JM. Putting occupation into practice: occupation as ends, occupation as means. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:354–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royeen CB. The 2003 eleanor clarke slagle lecture. Chaotic Occupational Therapy: collective Wisdom for a Complex Profession. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:609–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M, Imms C, King G, et al. Definitions and operationalization of mental health problems, wellbeing and participation constructs in children with NDD: distinctions and clarifications. IJERPH. 2021;18:1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVesser P, Berg C. Participation patterns in preschool children with an autism spectrum disorder. OTJR 2011;31:33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heah T, Case T, McGuire B, et al. Successful participation: the lived experience among children with disabilities. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:38–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonkin BL, Ogilvie BD, Greenwood SA, et al. The participation of children and youth with disabilities in activities outside of school: a scoping review: Étude de délimitation de l’étendue de la participation des enfants et des jeunes handicapés à des activités en dehors du contexte scolaire. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:226–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case-Smith J, O'Brien JC. Occupational therapy for children and adolescents. 7th ed. St. Louis, (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) [Internet]. Definitions of occupational therapy from member organisations. 2018. Avaialble from: http://www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Berg KL, Medrano J, Acharya K, et al. Health impact of participation for vulnerable youth with disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:7205195040p7205195041–7205195040p7205195049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson A, Wiechula R, Court A, et al. The JBI model of evidence‐based healthcare. Int J Evidence‐Based Healthc. 2005;3:207–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Upton D, Stephens D, Williams B, et al. Occupational therapists’ attitudes, knowledge, and implementation of evidence-based practice: a systematic review of published research. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77:24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupatinal Therapists (WFOT) [Internet]. Code of Ethics; 2016. Availbe from: http://www.wfot.org/ResourceCentre.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Molineux M, Bennett S. Contemporary occupational therapy practice: the challenges of being evidence based and philosophically congruent. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61(2):121–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen G, Hunter EG, Lieberman D, et al. AOTA's top 5 choosing wisely ® recommendations. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73(2):7302420010p7302420011–7302420010p7302420019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(7):509–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen A, Greber C. Occupation-focused practice: challenges and choices. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77:39–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa J. Becoming innovators in an era of hyperchange. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61:629–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger S, Kennedy-Behr A. Occupation-centred practice with children: a practical guide for occupational therapists. 2nd ed. Southern Gate, Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford G, Townsend E, Hocking C. Reflections on a renaissance of occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67:61–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health (9241545429); 2001. Available from:
   Google Scholar
• Dunford C, Bannigan K. Children and young people’s occupations, health and well being: a research manifesto for developing the evidence base. WFOT Bull. 2011;64:46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Hinojosa J. Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: is one better than the other? Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58:594–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer E. Occupation as means and ends in early childhood intervention – a scoping review [dissertation]. Sweden: Jönköping University; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris E, Pearson A. The systematic review: an overview. Am J Nurs. 2014;114:53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. Global accelerated action for the health of adolescents (AA-HA). 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512343.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer B, Clark GF, Arbesman M. Effectiveness of cognitive and occupation-based interventions for children with challenges in sensory processing and integration: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:7201190020p7201190021–7201190020p7201190029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisbier S, Laverdure P. Occupation- and activity-based interventions to improve performance of instrumental activities of daily living and rest and sleep for children and youth ages 5–21: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:7402180040p7402180041–7402180040p7402180032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill SM, Egan BE, Seber J. Activity- and occupation-based interventions to support mental health, positive behavior, and social participation for children and youth: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74:7402180020p7402180021–7402180020p7402180028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R, Bannigan K. Occupational therapy interventions in child and adolescent mental health to increase participation: a mixed methods systematic review. Br J Occup Ther. 2021;84:474–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: same, same or different? Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, et al. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1173–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, et al. The definition of disability: what is in a name? The lancet. British Edition. 2006;368:1219–1221. ().
   Google Scholar
• Altman BMP. Definitions, concepts, and measures of disability. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24:2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lollar DJ, Hartzell MS, Evans MA. Functional difficulties and health conditions among children with special health needs. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e714–e722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson-Lund M, Nyman A. Participation and occupation in occupational therapy models of practice: a discussion of possibilities and challenges. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:393–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. Participation’: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch D, Pepin G. Doing, being, becoming and belonging at the heart of occupational therapy: an analysis of theoretical ways of knowing. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28:13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, et al. Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis: JBI; 2020. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris E, Munn ZE. JBI manual for evidence synthesis; 2020. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer E, Green D, Lygnegård F. Systematic review protocol of the effectiveness of occupation-based and occupation-focused interventions used in occupational therapy to improve participation in everyday activities for young children with a disability. Inplasy Protocol. 2022. DOI: 10.37766/inplasv2022.6.0117
   Google Scholar
• Aromataris E, Riitano D. Systematic reviews: constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. Am J Nurs. 2014;114:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies KS. Formulating the evidence based practice question: a review of the frameworks. EBLIP. 2011;6:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) [Internet]. JBI Levels of Evidence. 2020. Availble from: https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2020-07/Supporting_Doc_JBI_Levels_of_Evidence.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Ramsay C, Reeves BC, et al. Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Res Syn Meth. 2013;4:12–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:iii–iix.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weingarten MA, Paul M, Leibovici L. Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2004;328:1013–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt GH, et al. 2013. GRADE Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October, 2013. Available from: guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, et al. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:240–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) [Internet]. Critical appraisal tools; 2020. Available from: https://joannabriggs.org/critical-appraisal-tools.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J, Chevignard M. Goal management training for rehabilitation of executive functions: a systematic review of effectiveness in patients with acquired brain injury. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 57:e67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, et al. Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. p. 321–348.
   Google Scholar
• Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) [Internet]. the system for unified management, assessment and review of information (SUMARI); 2017. Available from: https://www.jbisumari.org.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890–l6890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon MH, Thomson H. The effect direction plot revisited: application of the 2019 cochrane handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods. Res Syn Meth. 2021;12:29–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson HJ, Thomas S. The effect direction plot: visual display of non‐standardised effects across multiple outcome domains. Res Syn Meth. 2013;4:95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Davey Smith G. Sifting the evidence: what’s wrong with significance tests? BMJ. 2001;322:226–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang A-W, Chao M-Y, Liu S-W. A randomized controlled trial of routines-based early intervention for children with or at risk for developmental delay. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:3112–3123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Markowitz J, Berger I, Manor I, et al. Efficacy of cognitive-functional (Cog-Fun) occupational therapy intervention among children with ADHD: an RCT. J Atten Disord. 2020;24:655–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizi S, Hubbell K. The role of occupational therapy in promoting playfulness, parent competence, and social participation in early childhood playgroups: a pretest-posttest design. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2017;10:346–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaili SK, Mehraban AH, Shafaroodi N, et al. Participation in peer-play activities among children with specific learning disability: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73:7302205110 7302205111–7302205110 7302205119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman M, Novak I, Lannin N, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance over and above functional hand splints for children with cerebral palsy or brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. (Report). BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruijsen-Terpstra AJA, Ketelaar M, Verschuren O, et al. Efficacy of three therapy approaches in preschool children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:758–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law MC, Darrah J, Pollock N, et al. Focus on function: a cluster, randomized controlled trial comparing child- versus context-focused intervention for young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:621–629. Jul 2011 20170925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo CRS, Cardoso AA, Polatajko HJ, et al. Efficacy of the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) approach with and without parental coaching on activity and participation for children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized clinical trial. Res Dev Disabil. 2021;110:103862–103862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anu NR, Sugi S, Rajendran K. Pretend play as a therapeutic modality to enhance social competence in children with autism spectrum disorder: a quasi-experimental study. Indian J Occup Ther. 2019;51:96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Challita J, Chapparo C, Hinitt J, et al. Effective occupational therapy intervention with children demonstrating reduced social competence during playground interactions. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82:433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeir A, Fisher O, Bar-Ilan RT, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive-functional (Cog-Fun) occupational therapy intervention for young children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a controlled study. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:260–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A, Licari M, Reid S, et al. Cognitive orientation to (daily) occupational performance intervention leads to improvements in impairments, activity and participation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:979–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor C, Stagnitti K. Play, behaviour, language and social skills: the comparison of a play and a non-play intervention within a specialist school setting. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1205–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagnitti K, O'Connor C, Sheppa L. Impact of the learn to play program on play, social competence and language for children aged 5–8 years who attend a specialist school. Aust Occup Ther J. 2012;59:302–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves BC, Higgins JPT, Ramsay C, et al. An introduction to methodological issues when including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Res Syn Meth. 2013;4:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackshaw A. Small studies: strengths and limitations. Eur Respiratory Soc. 2008;32:1141–1143.
   Google Scholar
• Nüesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, et al. Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2010;341:c3515–c3515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerful practice: a model for authentic occupational therapy. FortCollins (CO): CIOTS-Center for Innovative OT Solutions; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards MA, Millard P, Praskac LA, et al. Occupational therapy and early intervention: a family‐centred approach. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10:239–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore L, Koger D, Blomberg S, et al. Making best practice our practice: reflections on our journey into natural environments. Infants Young Child. 2012;25:95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell PH, Chiarello L, Wilcox MJ, et al. Preparing therapists as effective practitioners in early intervention. Infants Young Child. 2009;22:21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGrace BW. Occupation-based and family-centered care: a challenge for current practice. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:347–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham F, Rodger S, Ziviani J. Effectiveness of occupational performance coaching in improving children’s and mothers’ performance and mothers’ self-competence. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernie C, Williams K, Graham F, et al. Coaching while waiting for autism spectrum disorder assessment: a pilot feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial on occupational performance coaching and service navigation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022. DOI:10.1007/s10803-022-05558-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallisch A, Pope E, Little L, et al. Telehealth for families of children with autism: acceptability and cost comparison of occupational performance coaching. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:7211515277p1–7211515277p1. p7211515271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Kahjoogh M, Kessler D, Hosseini SA, et al. Randomized controlled trial of occupational performance coaching for mothers of children with cerebral palsy. Brit J Occup Ther. 2019;82:213–219.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali AR, Alizadeh Zarei M, Sanjari MA, et al. Randomized controlled trial of occupation performance coaching for families of children with autism spectrum disorder by means of telerehabilitation. Brit J Occup Ther. 2022;85:308–315.
   Google Scholar
• Waisman-Nitzan M, Ivzori Y, Anaby D. Implementing pathways and resources for engagement and participation (PREP) for children with disabilities in inclusive schools: a knowledge translation strategy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(5):526–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaby DR, Law M, Feldman D, et al. The effectiveness of the pathways and resources for engagement and participation (PREP) intervention: improving participation of adolescents with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JM, Roemer K, Liljenquist K, et al. Formative evaluation of project TEAM (teens making environment and activity modifications). Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;52:258–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JM, Helfrich C, Levin M, et al. Initial evaluation of the effects of an environmental‐focused problem‐solving intervention for transition‐age young people with developmental disabilities: project TEAM. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:801–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adair B, Ullenhag A, Rosenbaum P, et al. Measures used to quantify participation in childhood disability and their alignment with the family of participation‐related constructs: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60:1101–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch C, Van Kruijsbergen M, Ketelaar M, et al. Assessing participation of children with acquired brain injury and cerebral palsy: a systematic review of measurement properties. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62:434–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusick A, McIntyre S, Novak I, et al. A comparison of goal attainment scaling and the Canadian occupational performance measure for paediatric rehabilitation research. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006;9:149–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coster W, Khetani MA. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:639–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakzewski L, Boyd R, Ziviani J. Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5‐ to 13‐year‐old children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien C-W, Rodger S, Copley J, et al. Comparative content review of children’s participation measures using the international classification of functioning, disability and health–children and youth. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroland‐Nordstrand K, Eliasson AC, Jacobsson H, et al. Can children identify and achieve goals for intervention? A randomized trial comparing two goal‐setting approaches. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa UM, Brauchle G, Kennedy-Behr A. Collaborative goal setting with and for children as part of therapeutic intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1589–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilott I, Taylor MC, Bolanos C. Evidence-based occupational therapy: it’s time to take a global approach. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69:38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Che Daud AZ, Yau MK, Barnett F. A consensus definition of occupation-based intervention from a Malaysian perspective: a Delphi study. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78:697–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khayatzadeh-Mahani M, Hassani Mehraban A, Kamali M, et al. Development and validation of occupation based practice measure (OBPM). Can J Occup Ther. 2022; 89(3):84174221102722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:373–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D-TV, Wang Y-M, Lee WC. Challenges confronting beginning researchers in conducting literature reviews. Stud Contin Educ. 2016;38:47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordier R, Chen Y-W, Speyer R, et al. Child-Report Measures of Occupational Performance: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147751–e0147751.
   Google Scholar
• Romli MH, Wan Yunus F, Mackenzie L. Overview of reviews of standardised occupation-based instruments for use in occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(4):428–445
   Google Scholar
• Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;45(5):626–629.
   Google Scholar