Underlying functions associated with keyboarding performance of elementary-school students

References

• Feng L, Lindner A, Ji XR, et al. The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: a meta-analytic review. Read Writ. 2019;32(1):33–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greifeneder R, Alt A, Bottenberg K, et al. On writing legibly: processing fluency systematically biases evaluations of handwritten material. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2010;1(3):230–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy MMP, Egan MY, Feder KP. A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78(1):13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadar M, Wan Yunus F, Tan E, et al. A systematic review of occupational therapy intervention for handwriting skills in 4–6 year old children. Aust Occup Ther J. 2020;67(1):3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburner J, Ziviani J, Pennington A. The introduction of keyboarding to children with autism spectrum disorders with handwriting difficulties: a help or a hindrance? Australas J Spec Educ. 2012;36(1):32–61.
   Google Scholar
• Donica DK, Giroux P, Faust A. Keyboarding instruction: comparison of techniques for improved keyboarding skills in elementary students. J Occup Ther Sch Early Interv. 2018;11(4):396–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen A, Balsvik L. Pen or keyboard in beginning writing instruction? Some perspectives from embodied cognition. Trends Neurosci Educ. 2016;5(3):99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S, Hebert M, Paige Sandbank M, et al. Assessing the writing achievement of young struggling writers: application of generalizability theory. Learn Disabil Q. 2016;39(2):72–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinehart LH. Handwriting in early childhood education: current research and future implications. J Early Child Lit. 2015;15(1):97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S, Aitken AA, Hebert M, et al. Do children with reading difficulties experience writing difficulties? A meta-analysis. J Educ Psychol. 2021;113(8):1481–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez JE, Marco I, Suárez N, et al. Internal structure and development of keyboard skills in spanish-speaking primary-school children with and without LD in writing. J Learn Disabil. 2016;50(5):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazek AL. An evaluation of two approaches for developing keyboarding skills in children with cognitive disabilities [dissertation]. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, USA; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Feit AM, Weir D, Oulasvirta A. How we type: movement strategies and performance in everyday typing Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM. p. 4262–4273, San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Mazer B. Validation of the revised child version of the assessment of computer task performance. Phys Occup Ther Pedia. 2008;28(3):235–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berninger VW, Abbott RD, Augsburger A, et al. Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Q. 2009;32(3):123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisschop E, Morales C, Gil V, et al. Fluency and accuracy in alphabet writing by keyboarding: a cross-sectional study in spanish-speaking children with and without learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2017;50(5):534–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski J. The internal structure of university students keyboard skills. J Writ Res. 2008;1(1):27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Khoury-Shaheen R, Weintraub N. Keyboarding assessments for elementary school students: can they be uniform. Comput Educ. 2022;3:100091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashiyama Y, Takeda K, Someya Y, et al. The neural basis of typewriting: a functional MRI study. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0137265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan GD, Crump MJ. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: the case for skilled typewriting. Psychol. Learn Motiv Adv Res Theory. 2011;54:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg-Adler T, Weintraub N. Keyboarding difficulties: frequency and characteristics among higher education students with handwriting difficulties. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 2020;35(2):82–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Moyal-Zada O. The relationship between handwriting and keyboarding skills and underlying skills related to them, among primary school students (master’s thesis) Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson R, Wengelin A, Johansson V, et al. Looking at the keyboard or the monitor: relationship with text production processes. Read Writ. 2010;23(7):835–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger F, Weiss PL, Weintraub N. Predicting occupational performance: handwriting versus keyboarding. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58(2):193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub N, Gilmour-Grill N, Weiss PL. Relationship between handwriting and keyboarding performance among fast and slow adult keyboarders. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(1):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger M, Bart VK. Typing style and the use of different sources of information during typing: an investigation using self-reports. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger VW, Abbott RD, Jones J, et al. Early development of language by hand: composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Dev Neuropsychol. 2006;29(1):61–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellinckx T, Roeyers H, Van Waelvelde H. Predictors of handwriting in children with autism spectrum disorder. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;71:176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Weigelt-Marom H, Weintraub N. Keyboarding versus handwriting speed of higher education students with and without learning disabilities: does touch-typing assist in narrowing the gap? Comput Educ. 2018;117:132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong T, Zhang M, Li C. Association of keyboarding fluency and writing performance in online-delivered assessment. Assess Writ. 2022;51:100575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saçkes M, Trundle KC, Bell RL. Young children’s computer skills development from kindergarten to third grade. Comput Educ. 2011;57(2):1698–1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven JC, Styles I, Raven MA. Raven’s coloured progressive matrices–CPM plus test booklet. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia RR. Reliability of the raven coloured progressive matrices for anglo and for Mexican-American children. Psychol. Schs. 1984;21(1):49–52. 1984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shany M, Lachman D, Shalem Z. Aleph-Taph: a test for the diagnosis of reading and writing disabilities, based on national Israeli norms. Tel Aviv: Yesod Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Llorente AM, Williams J, Satz P, et al. Children’s color trails test: professional manual. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Llorente AM, Voigt RG, Williams J, et al. Children’s color trails test 1 & 2: test-retest reliability and factorial validity. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(4):645–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juneja M, Mehar H, Sairam S, et al. Children’s color trail test for objective assessment of attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a diagnostic accuracy study. Indian Pediatr. 2019;56(12):1025–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffin J. Instruction and normative data for model 32020 Purdue pegboard. Chicago (IL): Science Research Association; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Buddenberg LA, Davis C. Test-retest reliability of the Purdue pegboard test. Am J Occup Ther. 2000;54(5):555–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger VW, Rutberg J. Relationship of finger function to beginning writing: application to diagnosis of writing disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;34(3):198–215.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub N, Blum A, Brandes S, et al. The hebrew keyboarding assessment elementary school students (H-KBAT). Jerusalem, Israel: School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub N, Graham S. Writing legibly and quickly: a study of children’s ability to adjust their handwriting to meet common classroom demands. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 1998;13(3):146–152.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi M, Crump MJC, Logan GD. Speed–accuracy trade-off in skilled typewriting: decomposing the contributions of hierarchical control loops. J Exp Psychol: hum Percept Perform. 2013;39(3):678–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan GD. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev. 1988;95(4):492–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gori J, Rioul O, Guiard Y. Speed-accuracy tradeoff: a formal information-theoretic transmission scheme (fitts). ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2018;25(5):1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly D, Neumann DL, Andrews G. Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: evidence from the national assessment of educational progress (NAEP). Am. Psychol. 2019;74(4):445–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell JJ, Napoliello ME, Eden FG. A combined fMRI study of typed spelling and reading. Neuroimage. 2011;55(2):750–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read JC, MacFarlane SJ, Casey C. Pens behaving badly-usability of pens and graphics tablets for text entry with children Adjunct Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Available on the CD-ROM issued at the UIST 2002 conference, published by ACM Press. 2002. p. 21–22.
   Google Scholar