Psychometric evaluation of the Finnish version of the Worker Role interview (WRI-FI)

References

• Statista [Internet]. Global unemployment rate. 2023. [cited 2023 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/279777/global-unemployment-rate/.
   Google Scholar
• OECD data [Internet]. Unemployment rate. 2022. [cited 2023 Mar 8]. Available from: https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland [Internet]. Unemployment rate. 2023. [cited 2023 May 5]. Available from: https://www.stat.fi/en/statistics/tyti.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Health in Finland [Internet]. Work ability programme 2022. Available from https://stm.fi/en/work-ability-programme1.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish government [Internet]. Finland built on trust and labour market equality. 2023. [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/marin/government-programme/finland-built-on-trust-and-labour-market-equality.
   Google Scholar
• Kerätär R, Taanila A, Jokelainen J, et al. Work disabilities and unmet needs for health care and rehabilitation among jobseekers: a community-level investigation using multidimensional work ability assessments. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(4):343–351. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin S, Curran J, Iantorno J, et al. Work capacity assessment and return to work: a scoping review. Work. 2013;44(1):37–55. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-01560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suomen Toimintaterapeuttiliitto ry [Finnish Occupational Therapy Association] [Internet] 2021. Available from: www.toimintaterapeuttiliitto.fi.
   Google Scholar
• Sandqvist J, Ekbladh E. Applying the model of human occupation to vocational rehabilitation. In: Taylor R, editor. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolter’s Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Köller B, Niedermann K, Klipstein A, et al. The psychometric properties of the German version of the new worker role interview (WRI-G 10.0) in people with musculoskeletal disorders. Work. 2011;40(4):401–410. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TOIMIA-tietokanta. Toimintakyvyn mittaamisen ja arvioinnin kansallisen asiantuntijaverkoston tietokanta. [The national expert network for measuring and evaluating performances Functioning Measures Database] Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos [Finnish institute for health and welfare] [Internet] 2021. [cited 2022 Dec 14]. Available from: https://thl.fi/fi/web/toimintakyky/etusivu/toimia-tietokanta/toimia-verkosto.
   Google Scholar
• Yngve M, Ekbladh E. Clinical utility of the worker role interview: a survey study among Swedish users. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(6):416–423. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1007161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvikoski A, Takala E-P, Juvonen-Posti P, et al. Työkyvyn käsite ja työkykymallit kuntoutuksen tutkimuksessa ja käytännöissä [The concept of work abili- ty in the research and practice of rehabilitation.] Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Social security and health reports 13, 2018. pp. 86
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Forsyth KH, Keponen R, et al. Talking with clients: assessment that collect information through interviews. In: Taylor R, editor. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation. Fifth ed. Philadelphia: Wolter’s Kluwer; 2017. p. 275–309.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R, editor. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation: theory and application. Fifth ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Anema JR. Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Braveman B, Robson M, Velozo C, et al. The Worker Role Interview (WRI),(version 10.0). Model of human occupation clearinghouse. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Biernacki SD. Reliability of the worker role interview. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47(9):797–803. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.9.797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo CA, Kielhofner G, Gern A, et al. Worker role interview: toward validation of a psychosocial work-related measure. J Occup Rehabil. 1999;9(3):153–168. doi: 10.1023/A:1021397600383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund L, Karlsson G, Kielhofner G, et al. Validity of the Swedish version of the worker role interview. Scand J Occup Ther. 1997;4(1-4):23–29. doi: 10.3109/11038129709035718.
   Google Scholar
• Lohss I, Forsyth K, Kottorp A. Psychometric properties of the worker role interview (version 10.0) in mental health. Brit J Occup Ther. 2012;75(4):171–179. doi: 10.4276/030802212X13336366278095.
   Google Scholar
• Ekbladh E, Haglund L, Thorell L-H. The worker role interview—preliminary data on the predictive validity of return to work of clients after an insurance medicine investigation. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(2):131–141. doi: 10.1023/b:joor.0000018329.79751.09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekbladh E, Thorell L-H, Haglund L. Return to work: the predictive value of the worker role interview (WRI) over two years. Work. 2010;35(2):163–172. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0968.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenger K, Kramer JM. Worker role interview: testing the psychometric properties of the icelandic version. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(3):160–172. doi: 10.1080/11038120601040743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsyth K, Braveman B, Kielhofner G, et al. Psychometric properties of the worker role interview. WORK. 2006;27(3):313–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsman B, Ihander J, Kaunola R, et al. Työroolia arvioiva haastattelu (WRI). [Finnish version of Velozo C., Kielhofner G. & Fisher G 1998]. A users guide to the worker role interview. 9th ed. Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus Oy; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman J, Keponen R, Nisula S. Työroolin arviointi WRI-FI [Finnish version of: braveman, B., Robson, M., Velozo C., Kielhofner G., Fisher G., Forsyth, K. & Kerschbaum, J. 2005. A users guide to the Worker Role Interview (10th ed.)] 2019.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Asses. 2009;13(12):9–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM2030 software and manuals. Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–1362. doi: 10.1002/art.23108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagquist C, Andrich D. Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the rasch model. Health Qual Life Out. 2017;15​(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Mes Trans. 1994;7:328.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Smith EV.Jr A rasch perspective. Educ Psychol Meas. 2007;67(3):394–409. doi: 10.1177/0013164406294776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, De Jong J, Sheridan BE. Diagnostic opportunities with the rasch model for ordered response categories. In applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences. New York: Waxmann; 1997. p. 59–70.
   Google Scholar