The ‘Young Adult Taking Action’ programme for young adult cancer survivors: A study protocol for a feasibility study

References

• Thorsen L, Bøhn SH, Lie HC, et al. Needs for information about lifestyle and rehabilitation in long-term young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:521–533. doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06418-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JM, Fitch M, Bongard J, et al. The needs and experiences of Post-Treatment adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellblom AV, Kiserud CE, Rueegg CS, et al. Self-reported late effects and long-term follow-up care among 1889 long-term norwegian childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors (the nor-CAYACS study). Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:2947–2957. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05790-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea S, Martins A, Fern LA, et al. The support and information needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer when active treatment ends. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:697. doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07197-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becktell K, Simpson P, Phelan R, et al. Developmental differences in health-related quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2020;29:2435–2444. doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02507-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AW, Parsons HM, Kent EE, et al. Unmet support service needs and Health-Related quality of life among adolescents and young adults with cancer: the AYA HOPE study. Front Oncol. 2013;3:75. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00075.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hydeman JA, Uwazurike OC, Adeyemi EI, et al. Survivorship needs of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a concept mapping analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13:34–42. doi:10.1007/s11764-018-0725-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SR, Zheng JY, Silver J, et al. Cancer rehabilitation as an essential component of quality care and survivorship from an international perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:8–13. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1514662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34:571–583. doi:10.1177/0269215520905112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maribo T, Ibsen C, Thuesen J, et al. Hvidbog om rehabilitering [white book on rehabiltation]. Aarhus: rehabiliteringsforum Danmark; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. WHO Definition of Rehabi­li­tation [Internet]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rehabilitation
   Google Scholar
• Kudre D, Chen Z, Richard A, et al. Multidisciplinary outpatient cancer rehabilitation can improve cancer patients’ physical and psychosocial status-a systematic review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020;22:122. doi:10.1007/s11912-020-00979-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj VS, Pugh TM, Yaguda SI, et al. The who, what, why, when, where, and how of Team-Based interdisciplinary cancer rehabilitation. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36:150974. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2019.150974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elnegaard C, Mikkelsen TB, Guldin MB, et al. Kræftrehabilitering i danmark. Status og udvikling fra 2017 til 2021. [Cancer rehabilitation in Denmark. Status and development from 2017 to 2019]. Nyborg: REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabiliation and Palliative Care 2022 (Unpublished data).
   Google Scholar
• Algeo N, Bennett K, Connolly D. Rehabilitation interventions to support return to work for women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:895. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08613-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Cancer Society. At være ung og få kræft. En spørgeskemaundersøgelse af de unges behov og oplevelser under og efter sygdom og behandling. [Being young and getting cancer. A questionnaire survey of the needs and experiences of young people during and after cancer]. Copenhagen 2015
   Google Scholar
• Bibby H, White V, Thompson K, et al. What are the unmet needs and care experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer? A systematic review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6:6–30. doi:10.1089/jayao.2016.0012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong AWK, Chang TT, Christopher K, et al. Patterns of unmet needs in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: in their own words. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:751–764. doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0613-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen SHM, van der Graaf WTA, van der Meer DJ, et al. Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivorship practices: an overview. Cancers. 2021;13:4847. doi:10.3390/cancers13194847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino NM, Penney A, Zebrack B. Providing developmentally appropriate psychosocial care to adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011;117(10 Suppl):2329–2334. doi:10.1002/cncr.26043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrack B. Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:349–357. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0469-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, White K, Patterson P. Understanding the experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer: a meta-synthesis. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;24:39–53. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2016.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett M, McDonnell G, DeRosa A, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and interventions among cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA): a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10:814–831. doi:10.1007/s11764-016-0527-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagesen M, Pilegaard MS, Hauken MA, et al. Users’ perspective on rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors: a group concept mapping study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31Oct 11::e13734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen NH, Christiansen JA, la Cour K, et al. Differences in functioning between young adults with cancer and older age groups: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31:e13660. Jul 17. doi:10.1111/ecc.13660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REHPA The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliation. Tilbage til hverdagslivet for unge voksne kræftoverlevere – YATAC-projektet [Back to everyday life for young adult cancer survivors - The YATAC project][Internet] 2022. Available from: https://www.rehpa.dk/projekter/tilbage-til-hverdagslivet-for-unge-voksne-kraeftoverlevere-yacs-projektet/.
   Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25:1–132. doi:10.3310/hta25570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015;38:506–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J, Madden K, Fletcher A, et al. Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:689. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4695-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029954. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:452–457. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plano Clark VL, Anderson N, Wertz JA, et al. Conceptualizing longitudinal mixed methods designs: a methodological review of health sciences research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2014;9:297–319. doi:10.1177/1558689814543563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed method research. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen A, Jespersen E, Backmann T, et al. Practice description, research clinic REHPA. Standard residential rehabilitation course for people with or after cancer. Nyborg: REHPA, The Danish knowledge center for Rehabilitation and Palliative care; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• The Danish Ministry of Health. The national health act. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/903
   Google Scholar
• Aagesen M, la Cour K, Møller JK, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors: a scoping review. Clin Rehabil. 2023. 2023 Apr 21:2692155231168720. doi: 10.1177/02692155231168720. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37083478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagesen M, Pilegaard MS, Hauken MA, et al. Developing a rehabilitation program for young adult cancer survivors in collaboration with young adult cancer survivors and key stakeholders. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane A, Galvin R, O’Sullivan M, et al. Participatory methods for research prioritization in primary care: an analysis of the world café approach in Ireland and the USA. Fam Pract. 2017;34:278–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagesen M, la Cour K, Moeller JK, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for young adult cancer survivors: a scoping review 2021. https://osf.io/hn5df.
   Google Scholar
• The Danish Health Authroity. Forløbsprogram for rehabilitering og palliation i forbindelse med kræft. [Disease management pathways for rehabilitation and palliation regarding cancer]. Copehagen: the Danish Health Authroity; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hauken MA, Larsen TMB, Holsen I. “Back on track”: a longitudinal mixed methods study on the rehabilitation of young adult cancer survivors. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2019;13:339–360. doi:10.1177/1558689817698553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean SG, Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Interprofessional rehabilitation: a Person-Centred approach. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, et al. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2299–2306. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Dewey Society. Education and culture. Iowa City: University of Iowa; 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Cole MB. Group dynamics in occupational therapy: the theoretical basis and practice application of group intervention. New Jersey: SLACK Incorporated; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:291–295. doi:10.1177/0269215509103551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Taylor WJ. Toward a cognitive-affective model of goal-setting in rehabilitation: is self-regulation theory a key step? Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1175–1183. doi:10.1080/09638280410001724834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer JC, Wheeler SB. A systematic review of motivational interviewing interventions in cancer patients and survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:1099–1105. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen S, Roser K, Mulder RL, et al. Recommendations for the surveillance of cancer-related fatigue in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group. J Cancer Surviv. 2020;14:923–938. doi:10.1007/s11764-020-00904-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels E, Husson O, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. The effect of exercise on cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:479–494. doi:10.2147/NDT.S150464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott E, Loades M, Baker L, et al. Cancer-related fatigue in teenage and young adult cancer patients: Clinicians’ perspectives, practice and challenges. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021;30:e13337. doi:10.1111/ecc.13337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong MSY, van Noorden CJF, Steindorf K, et al. Cancer-Related fatigue: Causes and current treatment options. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020;21:17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi E, Gozali N, Moghaddam Tabrizi F. Effects of energy conservation strategies on cancer related fatigue and health promotion lifestyle in breast CancerSurvivors: a randomized control trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:4783–4790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treanor CJ, McMenamin UC, O’Neill RF, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:Cd011325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lange M, Joly F, Vardy J, et al. Cancer-related cognitive impairment: an update on state of the art, detection, and management strategies in cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1925–1940. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• sundhed.dk. Energiforvaltning [Energy conservation]. https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/32/111432_energiforvaltning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DGI. Smart træning holder hjernen fit [Smart training keeps the brain fit] 2017. https://www.dgi.dk/gymnastik/gymnastik/artikler/smart-traening-holder-hjernen-fit
   Google Scholar
• Caru M, Levesque A, Rao P, et al. A scoping review to map the evidence of physical activity interventions in post-treatment adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;171:103620. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauken MA, Holsen I, Fismen E, et al. Working toward a good life as a cancer survivor: a longitudinal study on positive health outcomes of a rehabilitation program for young adult cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38:3–15. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh G, Below N, Fisher A, et al. Trekstock RENEW: evaluation of a 12-week exercise referral programme for young adult cancer survivors delivered by a cancer charity. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28:5803–5812. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05373-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silent FIT. Silent FIT. https://silent.fit/
   Google Scholar
• Buffart LM, van Uffelen JG, Riphagen II, et al. Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer. 2012;712:559. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piet J, Würtzen H, Zachariae R. The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80:1007–1020. doi:10.1037/a0028329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker E, Martins A, Aldiss S, et al. Psychosocial interventions for adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer during adolescence: a critical review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016;5:310–321. doi:10.1089/jayao.2016.0025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folbrecht J, Mayorga L, Fulginiti K, et al. Reduction of distress and attrition in a 6-Week psychoeducational group: a pilot study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2022;11:56–60. doi:10.1089/jayao.2021.0030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn A, Kuperberg A. Psychosocial support in adolescents and young adults with cancer. Cancer J. 2018;/Dec24:321–327. doi:10.1097/PPO.0000000000000339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin H, Bartlett R, De Gagne JC. Integrative literature review on psychological distress and coping strategies among survivors of adolescent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020;47:E131–e148. doi:10.1188/20.ONF.E131-E148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehling S, Philipp R. Existential distress and meaning-focused interventions in cancer survivorship. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12:46–51. doi:10.1097/SPC.0000000000000324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell T. The sources of meaning and meaning in life questionnaire (SoMe): relations to demographics and well-being. J Posit Psychol. 2009;4:483–499. doi:10.1080/17439760903271074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawzy FI, Fawzy NW. A short term, structured, psychoeducational intervention for newly diagnosed cancer patients. In: Watson M, Kissane DW, editors. Handbook of psychotherapy in cancer care. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.; 2011. p. 119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Sundhed.dk. Tilbage på arbejde med eller efter kræft [Return to work with or after cancer] [cited 2022 September 16]. https://www.sundhed.dk/borger/behandling-og-rettigheder/kraeft/materialer-om-rehabilitering/tilbage-til-arbejde-efter-sygdom/tilbage-paa-arbejde-kraeft-borgere-arbejdspladser/.
   Google Scholar
• Aagesen M, Tofte J, Zwisler AD, et al. Kræft, rehabilitering og arbejde. Viden, rehabilitering og arbejde [Cancer, rehabilitation and work. Knowledge, legislation, practice and the future]. Nyborg, Denmark: REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:415–437. doi:10.1007/s11764-010-0154-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doidge O, Edwards N, Thompson K, et al. A conceptual framework to identify and address the education and vocational barriers experienced by adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019;8:398–401. doi:10.1089/jayao.2018.0153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fardell JE, Wakefield CE, Patterson P, et al. Narrative review of the educational, vocational, and financial needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer: Recommendations for support and research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018;7:143–147. doi:10.1089/jayao.2017.0086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dax V, Edwards N, Doidge O, et al. Evaluation of an educational and vocational service for adolescent and young adults with cancer: a retrospective review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2021;10:56–65. doi:10.1089/jayao.2020.0009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone DS, Ganz PA, Pavlish C, et al. Young adult cancer survivors and work: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:765–781. doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0614-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetsch J, Wakefield CE, McGill BC, et al. Educational and vocational goal disruption in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2018;27:532–538. doi:10.1002/pon.4525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbernd A, Pedersen KJ, Boisen KA, et al. On your own": adolescent and young adult cancer survivors’ experience of managing return to secondary or higher education in Denmark. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018;7:618–625. doi:10.1089/jayao.2018.0058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Board of Health and Welfare. Voksenudredningsmetoden [the method of adult diagnosing is a special set of guidelines for diagnosing adults within single municipalities]. Odense: the National Board of Health and Welfare; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Geue K, Schmidt R, Sender A, et al. Sexuality and romantic relationships in young adult cancer survivors: satisfaction and supportive care needs. Psychooncology. 2015;24:1368–1376. doi:10.1002/pon.3805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annon JS. The PLISSIT model: a proposed conceptual scheme for the behavioral treatment of sexual problems. J Sex Educ Ther. 1976;2:1–15. doi:10.1080/01614576.1976.11074483.
   Google Scholar
• Aubin S, Perez S. The clinician’s toolbox: assessing the sexual impacts of cancer on adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAC). Sex Med. 2015;3:198–212. doi:10.1002/sm2.75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann V, Laan ETM, den Oudsten BL. Sexual health-related care needs among young adult cancer patients and survivors: a systematic literature review. J Cancer Surviv. 2022;16:913–924. doi:10.1007/s11764-021-01084-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esch M. Sexual health: a nursing approach to supporting the needs of young adult cancer survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021;25:501–506. doi:10.1188/21.CJON.501-506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canada AL, Schover LR, Li Y. A pilot intervention to enhance psychosexual development in adolescents and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49:824–828. doi:10.1002/pbc.21130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzona MR, Victorson DE, Murphy K, et al. A conceptual model of fertility concerns among adolescents and young adults with cancer. Psychooncology. 2021;30:1383–1392. doi:10.1002/pon.5695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr M, Watson S, Macpherson CF, et al. The cost of cancer: a retrospective analysis of the financial impact of cancer on young adults. Cancer Med. 2016;5:863–870. 02/01;5:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/cam4.657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Cancer Society. Legater [Grants]. https://www.cancer.dk/hjaelp-viden/rettigheder/oekonomisk-hjaelp/legat/
   Google Scholar
• Kowitt SD, Ellis KR, Carlisle V, et al. Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:97–108. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4479-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent EE, Smith AW, Keegan TH, et al. Talking about cancer and meeting peer survivors: Social information needs of adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2013;2:44–52. doi:10.1089/jayao.2012.0029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proof of Life. https://proofoflife.dk/
   Google Scholar
• Young Cancer. Ung Kræft [Young Cancer]. https://www.cancer.dk/ungkraeft/.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuteritz K, Friedrich M, Nowe E, et al. Recruiting young adult cancer patients: experiences and sample characteristics from a 12-month longitudinal study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;36:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2018.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REHPA. Lægehenvisning af mennesker med kræft [Referral of people with cancer]. 2022. https://www.rehpa.dk/fagpersoner/rehpa-forskningsklinik/laegehenvisning-til-forskningsklinik/laegehenvisning-af-kraeftpatienter-til-rehpa/
   Google Scholar
• Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:88. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–376. doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the brief fatigue inventory. Cancer. 1999;85:1186–1196. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1186::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-N.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz A, Mehnert A, Kocalevent RD, et al. Assessment of depression severity with the PHQ-9 in cancer patients and in the general population. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:22. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0728-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092–1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, et al. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two Population-Based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26:655–672. doi:10.1177/0164027504268574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:279. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07577-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton NC, et al. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindell C, Coates E, Croot L, et al. The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:877. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AA, Papadakos JK, Jones JM, et al. Reimagining care for adolescent and young adult cancer programs: moving with the times. Cancer. 2016;122:1038–1046. doi:10.1002/cncr.29834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar