Occupational therapists’ experiences of using a new internet-based intervention - a focus group study

References

• Regeringskansliet. God och nära vård - En reform för ett hållbart hälso- och sjukvårdssystem SOU 2020. [Integrated and person centered care - Reform for a sustainable health care system]. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2020/04/sou-202019/. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• EUR-Lex. Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions empty, Brussels. 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:233:FIN
   Google Scholar
• Patomella AH, Farias L, Eriksson C, et al. Engagement in everyday activities for prevention of stroke: feasibility of an mHealth-supported program for people with TIA. Healthcare: MDPI. 2021;9:1. doi:10.3390/healthcare9080968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Månsson Lexell E, Nyman A. Optimising the development of sustainable internet-based occupational therapy interventions: important key actions and perspectives to consider. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29:259–12. doi:10.1080/11038128.2021.1950206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. Nationella riktlinjer för vård vid stroke [national guidelines for stroke care]. 2020. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Wassenius C, Claesson L, Blomstrand C, et al. Integrating consequences of stroke into everyday life–experiences from a long-term perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29:126–138. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1857433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, et al. Action plan for stroke in Europe 2018–2030. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3:309–336. doi:10.1177/2396987318808719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Aasnes M, Tistad M, et al. Occupational gaps in everyday life one year after stroke and the association with life satisfaction and impact of stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:244–255. doi:10.1310/tsr1903-244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kylén M, Ytterberg C, von Koch L, et al. How is the environment integrated into post-stroke rehabilitation? A qualitative study among community-dwelling persons with stroke who receive home rehabilitation in Sweden. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30:1933–1943. doi:10.1111/hsc.13572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassberg A, Nyman A, Larsson Lund M. Perceived occupational balance in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43:553–558. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1632940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:797–810. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Saez MM, James N. The experience of occupational identity disruption post stroke: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43:1044–1055. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1645889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1566–1574. doi:10.1080/09638280701618588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Bootle K. Client and carer experience of transition home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1380–1386. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.740134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander A, Iwarsson S, Jönsson A, et al. Living and ageing with stroke: an exploration of conditions influencing participation in social and leisure activities over 15 years. Brain Inj. 2018;32:858–866. doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1463561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcheus I, Ranner M, Nyman A, et al. Developing and testing the feasibility of a new internet-based intervention– a case study of people with stroke and occupational therapists. 2022. Submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Holmgren K. Fokusgrupper [Focus groups]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2017. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson-Lund M, Månsson Lexell E, Nyman A. Strategies for empowering activities in everyday life (SEE 1.0): study protocol for a feasibility study of an internet-based occupational therapy intervention for people with stroke. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021;7:1–12. doi:10.1186/s40814-021-00924-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High Educ Res Dev. 2015;34:1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffett J. Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Med. Teach. 2015;37:331–336. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.943710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveriges kommuner och regioner. Överenskommelse om god och nära vård [Agreement on Integrated and person centered care]. 2023. https://skr.se/skr/halsasjukvard/utvecklingavverksamhet/naravard/overenskommelseomengodochnaravard.28402.html. [In Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed B, Dannhauser T, Philip N. A systematic review of reviews to identify key research opportunities within the field of eHealth implementation. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25:276–285. doi:10.1177/1357633X18768601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Meesters JJ, Wentink MM, et al. Why the uptake of eRehabilitation programs in stroke care is so difficult—a focus group study in The Netherlands. Implement Sci. 2018;13:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollmark M, Skjöldebrand AL, Andersson C, et al. Technology ready to be launched, but is there a payer? Challenges for implemeing eHealth in nt Sweden. In PHealth 2015: proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health; 2015 June 2–4; Västerås, Sweden, 2015IOS Press, 2015. p. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Guidetti S, Gustavsson M, Tham K, et al. F@ ce: a team-based, person-centred intervention for rehabilitation after stroke supported by information and communication technology–a feasibility study. BMC Neurol. 2020;20:387. doi:10.1186/s12883-020-01968-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Peng W, Adams J, et al. The use of self-management strategies for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023;30 :552–567. doi:10.1080/10749357.2022.2127651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruksakulpiwat S, Zhou W. Self-management interventions for adults with stroke: a scoping review. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2021;7:139–148. doi:10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.03.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oh HX, De Silva DA, Toh ZA, et al. The effectiveness of self-management interventions with action-taking components in improving health-related outcomes for adult stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:7751–7766. doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.2001057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher S, Kulnik ST, Demain S, et al. The problem with self-management: problematising self-management and power using a foucauldian lens in the context of stroke care and rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218517. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Chuh A, Floyd T, et al. Effectiveness of occupation-based interventions to improve areas of occupation and social participation after stroke: an evidence-based review. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen DM, Gillen G, Geller D, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve occupational performance of people with motor impairments after stroke: an evidence-based review. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennfält S, Norrving B, Petersson J, et al. Long-term survival and function after stroke: a longitudinal observational study from the swedish stroke register. Stroke. 2019;50:53–61. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Mair F, Finch T, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43:535–554. doi:10.1177/0038038509103208.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, et al. Using normalization process theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13:1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. London: Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas MH, Bonsaksen T. Exploring occupation-based practice among occupational therapists in hospitals and rehabilitation institutions. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;13:1–11. doi:10.1080/11038128.2022.2059564.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding K, Gustafsson L, Di Tommaso A. Occupation-based group programs in the inpatient hospital rehabilitation setting: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:2138–2148. doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1813818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirkka M, Larsson-Lund M, Zingmark K. Experiences with continuous quality improvement work based on the occupational therapy intervention process model. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;9:1–7. doi:10.1080/11038128.2022.2121756.
   Google Scholar
• Sirkka M, Larsson-Lund M, Zingmark K. Occupational therapists’ experiences of improvement work: a journey towards sustainable evidence-based practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:90–97. doi:10.3109/11038128.2013.872183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock NJ, Houghton J, Jones F. Integrating an approach to personalised self-management support in stroke and neurorehabilitation service contexts: people1st–a quality improvement initiative. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;27:1–12. doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2127930.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanoff SD, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:125–132. doi:10.1080/11038120600691082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health & Illness. 1994;16:103–121. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway I, Galvin K. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. 4th ed. Chichester, West Sussex: wiley-Blackwell; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny AJ. Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49:414–422. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03305.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivaz M, Shokrollahi P, Ebadi A. Online focus group discussions: an attractive approach to data collection for qualitative health research. Nurs Pract. 2019;6:1–3.
   Google Scholar