The shadow side of occupational therapy: Necropower, state racism and colonialism

References

• Turcotte P-L, Holmes D. The (dis)obedient occupational therapist: a reflection on dissent against disciplinary propaganda. Cad Bras Ter Ocup. 2021;29: 1–14. doi:10.1590/2526-8910.ctoarf2211.
   Google Scholar
• Farias L, Laliberte Rudman D. Practice analysis: critical reflexivity on discourses constraining socially transformative occupational therapy practices. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(11):693–697. doi:10.1177/0308022619862111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCapra D. History, language, and reading: waiting for crillon. Am Hist Rev. 1995;100(3):799–828. doi:10.2307/2168606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robcis C. Disalienation: politics, philosophy, and radical psychiatry in postwar France. Chicago and London: Univ Chicago Press; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder G. Freedom time: negritude, decolonization, and the future of the world. Durham, NC: Duke Univ Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes D, Federman C. Killing for the state: the darkest side of American nursing. Nurs Inq. 2003;10(1):2–10. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00162.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes D, Rudge T, Perron A. (Re) thinking violence in health care settings: a critical approach. Farnham, UK: ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida J. Dissemination. Johnson B, editor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon F. The wretched of the earth. New York, NY: Grove Press; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden P, McColl MA. The concept of occupation: 1900 to 1974. In: McColl MA, Law M, Stewart D, Doubt L, Pollock N, Krupa T, editors. Theoretical basis of occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2003. p. 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Clark F. Reflections on the human as an occupational being: biological need, tempo and temporality. J Occup Sci. 1997;4(3):86–92. doi:10.1080/14427591.1997.9686424.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier M-L. Cultural competency and the reproduction of white supremacy in occupational therapy education. Health Educ J. 2020;79(6):633–644. doi:10.1177/0017896920902515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramugondo E. Healing work: intersections for decoloniality. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bull. 2018;74(2):83–91. doi:10.1080/14473828.2018.1523981.
   Google Scholar
• Kiepek NC, Beagan B, Laliberte Rudman D, et al. Silences around occupations framed as unhealthy, illegal, and deviant. J Occup Sci. 2019;26(3):341–353. doi:10.1080/14427591.2018.1499123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2011;74(1):27–33. doi:10.4276/030802211X12947686093602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbembe A. Necropolitics. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Emery-Whittington I. Occupational justice—colonial business as usual? Indigenous observations from aotearoa New Zealand. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88(2):153–162. doi:00084174211005891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulthard GS. Red skin, white masks: rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis, MN: univ Minnesota Press. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls L. The ‘therapeutic use of self’ in occupational therapy. In: Nicholls L, Piergrossi JC, Gibertoni CdS, Daniel M, editors. Psychoanalytic thinking in occupational therapy. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW, Laliberte Rudman D, Zafran H, et al. Unbecoming change agents. Can J Occup Ther. 2022;89(2):96–102. doi:10.1177/00084174221089708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D. Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. West Sussex (UK): Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2012. p. 100–116.
   Google Scholar
• Butler J. Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Adam S, Jiang C, Mikhail M, et al. Infrahuman madness: mental health nursing and the discursive production of alterity. Nurs Inq. 2022; First Published:e12533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst W. Work, psychiatry and society, c. 1750–2015. Ernst W, editor. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J. From work and occupation to occupational therapy: the policies of professionalisation in english mental hospitals from 1919 to 1959. In: ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester, UK: manchester University Press; 2016. p. 314–333.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls L, Elliot ML. In the shadow of occupation: racism, shame and grief. J Occup Sci. 2019;26(3):354–365. doi:10.1080/14427591.2018.1523021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst W. ‘Useful both to the patients as well as to the state’: patient work in colonial mental hospitals in South Asia, c. 1818–1948. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Smith L. ‘A powerful agent in their recovery’: Work as treatment in British West Indian lunatic asylums, 1860–1910. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 142–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lifton RJ. The nazi doctors: medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York (NY): Basic Books; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Burleigh M. Death and Deliverance: "Euthanasia" in Germany c. 1900-1945. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Univ Press; 1994. 382. p. p
   Google Scholar
• Benedict S, Shields L. Nurses and midwives in nazi Germany: the" euthanasia programs. New York (NY): Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Müller T. Between therapeutic instrument and exploitation of labour force: patient work in rural asylums in württemberg, c. 1810–1945. In: ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 220–237.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York (NY): Vintage Books; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Perron A, Fluet C, Holmes D. Agents of care and agents of the state: bio-power and nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(5):536–544. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03432.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth T. Understanding ‘caring’ through biopolitics: the case of nurses under the nazi regime. Nurs Philos. 2013;14(4):284–294. doi:10.1111/nup.12013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federman C, Holmes D. Breaking bodies into pieces: time, torture and Bio-Power. Crit Crim. 2005;13(3):327–345. doi:10.1007/s10612-005-3187-9.
   Google Scholar
• Foth T. Nurses, medical records and the killing of sick persons before, during and after the nazi regime in Germany. Nurs Inq. 2013;20(2):93–100. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2012.00596.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler D. Eugenics scandal reveals silence of swedish scientists. Nature. 1997;389(6646):9–9. doi:10.1038/37848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normandin S. Eugenics, McGill, and the catholic church in montreal and Quebec: 1890-1942. Can Bull Med Hist. 1998;15(1):59–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider W. Toward the improvement of the human race: the history of eugenics in France. J Mod Hist. 1982;54(2):268–291. doi:10.1086/244134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber SA. U.S. scientists’ role in the eugenics movement (1907-1939): a contemporary biologist’s perspective. Zebrafish. 2008;5(4):243–245. doi:10.1089/zeb.2008.0576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleigh M. The third reich: a new history. New York, NY: Hill and Wang; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H. Radical exclusion: nazi euthanasia, 1939–1945. In: Dorrance T, Oetzel A, editors. Ex post facto. San Francisco: San Francisco State Univ; 2005. p. 8–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ankele M. The patient’s view of work therapy: the mental hospital Hamburg-Langenhorn during the Weimar Republic. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 238–261.
   Google Scholar
• Harris B. Therapeutic work and mental illness in America, c. 1830–1970. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh O. Work and the Irish district asylums during the late nineteenth century. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 298–313.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney S. Useful members of society or motiveless malingerers? Occupation and malingering in British asylum psychiatry, 1870–1914. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• McKay K. From blasting powder to tomato pickles: patient work at the provincial mental hospitals in British Columbia, Canada, 1885–1920. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Toma V-V. Work and occupation in Romanian psychiatry, c. 1838–1945. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 194–219.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura O. Patient work and family care at Iwakura, Japan, c. 1799–1970. In: Ernst W, editor. Work, psychiatry and society, c 1750–2015. Manchester (UK): Manchester Univ Press; 2016. p. 182–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo E. Occupational consciousness. J Occup Sci. 2015;22(4):488–501. doi:10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte P-L, Holmes D. From domestication to imperial patronage: deconstructing the biomedicalisation of occupational therapy. Health. 2023;27(5):719–737. doi:10.1177/13634593211067891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter C, Pride T. Critiquing the Canadian model of Client-Centered enablement (CMCE) for indigenous contexts: critique du modèle canadien d’habilitation centrée sur le client (MCHCC) pour les contextes autochtones. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88(4):329–339. doi:10.1177/00084174211042960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guajardo A. About new forms of colonization in occupational therapy. Reflections on the Idea of Occupational Justice from a Critical-Political Philosophy Perspective. Cad Bras Ter Ocup. 2020;28:1–17. doi:10.4322/2526-8910.ctoARF2175
   Google Scholar
• Davis G, Came H. A pūrākau analysis of institutional barriers facing māori occupational therapy students. Aust Occup Ther J. 2022;69(4):414–423. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson C. When the river runs dry: leadership, decolonisation and healing in occupational therapy. NZ J Occup Ther. 2020;67:11. +.
   Google Scholar
• Drees LM. Healing histories: Stories from Canada’s Indian hospitals. Edmonton (AB): Univ of Alberta; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Oza RK. India. Philadelphia, PA: Proceedings of the Third international congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists. 1962;42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Levy L. Israel. Philadelphia, PA: Proceedings of the Third international congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists. 1962;28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson GM. Leprosy and some uses of occupational therapy in its treatment. Occup Ther. 1962;25(11):20–22. doi:10.1177/030802266202501105.
   Google Scholar
• Robcis C. Frantz fanon, institutional psychotherapy, and the decolonization of psychiatry. J Hist Ideas. 2020;81(2):303–325. doi:10.1353/jhi.2020.0009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. The relationship between objects and identity in occupational therapy: a dynamic balance of rationalism and romanticism. Auckland: Auckland Univ of Technology; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon F. Black skin, White Masks: Paladin London; 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Robcis C. François Tosquelles and the psychiatric revolution in postwar France. Constellations. 2016;23(2):212–222. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafont M. L’extermination douce: la mort de 40000 malades mentaux dans les hôpitaux psychiatriques en France sous le régime de vichy. Ligné: Éditions de l’Arefppi; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon F. Alienation and freedom. London (UK): Bloomsbury Publishing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon F. Le « syndrome nord-africain ». Esprit. 1952;187(2):237–248.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch K. Gradations of debility and capacity: biocapitalism and the neoliberalization of disability relations. CJDS. 2015;4(2):12–48. doi:10.15353/cjds.v4i2.208.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan KS. Biocapital: the constitution of postgenomic life. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Petersen KS. Occupational science: an important contributor to occupational therapists’ clinical reasoning. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23(3):240–243. doi:10.3109/11038128.2015.1083054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank G. Occupational science’s stalled revolution and a manifesto for reconstruction. J Occup Sci. 2022;29(4):455–477. doi:10.1080/14427591.2022.2110658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery-Whittington I, Maro T. B. Decolonising occupation: causing social change to help our ancestors rest and our descendants thrive. NZ J Occup Ther. 2018;65(1):12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Incorporated; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ince OU. Colonial capitalism and the dilemmas of liberalism. New York (NY): Oxford Univ Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Murthi K, Hammell KW. Choice’ in occupational therapy theory: a critique from the situation of patriarchy in India. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1769182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abberley P. Disabling ideology in health and welfare - the case of occupational therapy. Disability & Society. 1995;10(2):221–232. doi:10.1080/09687599550023660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy CR. From impairment to disability and beyond: critical explorations in disability studies. Sociological Bull. 2011;60(2):287–306. doi:10.1177/0038022920110205.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin G, Steele L, Cadwallader JR. Normality and disability: intersections among norms, law, and culture. Continuum. 2017;31(3):337–340. doi:10.1080/10304312.2017.1275077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar JK. Prognosis time: towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: a Journal of Feminist Theory. 2009;19(2):161–172. doi:10.1080/07407700903034147.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston J. Debility and the moral imagination in. Botswana: indiana Univ Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ineese-Nash N. Disability as a colonial construct: the missing discourse of culture in conceptualizations of disabled indigenous children. Can J Disability Studies. 2020;9(3):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant L. Slow death (sovereignty, obesity, lateral agency). Crit Inq. 2007;33(4):754–780. doi:10.1086/521568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristeva J. A tragedy and a dream: Disability revisited. Ir Theol Q. 2013;78(3):219–230. doi:10.1177/0021140013484427.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel JC, Holmes D, Perron A, et al. Biopower under a state of exception: stories of dying and grieving alone during COVID-19 emergency measures. Med Humanit. 2022;48:471–479. doi:10.1136/medhum-2021-012255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. Occupational science: the key to broadening horizons. B. J Occup Ther. 2001;64(8):412–417. doi:10.1177/030802260106400808.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry V. Capacity, debility and differential inclusion: the politics of microfinance in South India. Disabil Stud Q. 2018;38(1):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdiani H, Ungar M. The dark side of resilience. Adv Res Sci. 2021;2(3):147–155. doi:10.1007/s42844-021-00031-z.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. A call to resist occupational therapy’s promotion of ableism. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29(1):1–12. doi:10.1080/11038128.2021.1895308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao DPG, Sy MP, Martinez PGV, et al. Is occupational therapy an ableist health profession? A critical reflection on ableism and occupational therapy. Cad Bras Ter Ocu. 2022;30:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier M-L. Patient case formulations and oppressive disability discourses in occupational therapy education. Can J Occup Ther. 2021;88(3):266–272. doi:10.1177/00084174211005882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman C, VanPuymbrouck L. Ageism and ableism: unrecognized biases in occupational therapy students. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2021;39(4):354–369. doi:10.1080/02703181.2021.1880531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte P-L, Holmes D, Perron A. L’outil d’évaluation multi-clientèle comme mécanisme de contrôle des soins à domicile: une analyse poststructuraliste. Recherche En Soins Infirmiers. 2021;146(3):7–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grenier Y, Andrien L, Sarrazin C, et al. Le triage en services d’urgence en temps de pandémie au québec: l’outil en tant que stratégie micropolitique d’un agencement biopolitique. aequitas. 2021;27(1):111–135. doi:10.7202/1078373ar.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho R, Maher J, Gaind KS, et al. The realities of medical assistance in dying in Canada. Palliat Support Care. 2023. doi:10.1017/S1478951523001025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria Galheigo S. What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58(2):60–66. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00922.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze G. Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle. L’Autre Journal. 1990;1:240–247.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggieri M, Palmisano B, Fratocchi G, et al. Validated fall risk assessment tools for use with older adults: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2018;36(4):331–353. doi:10.1080/02703181.2018.1520381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hignett S. Manual handling risk assessments in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2001;64(2):81–86. doi:10.1177/030802260106400205.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley K, Ryan S. Occupational therapy risk assessment in forensic mental health practice: an exploration. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72(12):531–538. doi:10.4276/030802209X12601857794736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case-Smith J. An efficacy study of occupational therapy with high-risk neonates. Am J Occup Ther. 1988;42(8):499–506. doi:10.5014/ajot.42.8.499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwa A, Sweetman MM, Helgeson L. Occupational therapy and veteran suicide: a call to action. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71(5):7105100010p1–7105100010p6. doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.023358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennhardt S, Rudman DL. When occupation goes ‘wrong’: a critical reflection on risk discourses and their relevance in shaping occupation. Occupational science. 2012. p. 117–33.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E. Good intentions OverRuled a critique of empowerment in the routine organization of mental health services. Toronto (ON): Univ of Toronto Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton D. Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Univ Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Self-Care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(2):107–114. doi:10.1177/000841740907600208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonelli AP, Camarotto JA. Analysis of industrial tasks as a tool for the inclusion of people with disabilities in the work market. Occup Ther Int. 2008;15(3):150–164. doi:10.1002/oti.249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman D, Aldrich R. “Activated, but stuck”: applying a critical occupational lens to examine the negotiation of Long-Term unemployment in contemporary Socio-Political contexts. Societies. 2016;6(28):1–17. doi:10.3390/soc6030028.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Wijne I, Curfs L, Hollins S, et al. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism spectrum disorders: investigation of 39 dutch case reports (2012–2021). BJPsych Open. 2023;9(3):1–8. doi:10.1192/bjo.2023.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson RM. South african occupational therapy values: 1997 submission to the truth and reconciliation commission. South African J Occup Ther. 2008;38:18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Simaan J. Olive growing in palestine: a decolonial ethnographic study of collective daily-forms-of-resistance. J Occup Sci. 2017;24(4):510–523. doi:10.1080/14427591.2017.1378119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado de Oliveira V. Hospicing modernity: facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. Berkeley (CA): North Atlantic Books; 2021.
   Google Scholar