Ageing in the right place—usability of a web-based housing counselling service

References

• Ahn M, Kwon HJ, Kang J. Supporting aging-in-place well: findings from a cluster analysis of the reasons for aging-in-place and perceptions of well-being. J Appl Gerontol. 2020;39(1):1–18. doi:10.1177/0733464817748779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfqvist C, Granbom M, Himmelsbach I, et al. Voices on relocation and aging in place in very old age—a complex and ambivalent matter. Gerontol. 2013;53(6):919–927. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt034.
   Google Scholar
• Golant SM. The Changing Residential Environments of Older People. Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 7th ed. Academic press; 2011. Chapter 15. pp. 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Bigonnesse C, Chaudhury H. The landscape of “aging in place” in gerontology literature: emergence, theoretical perspectives, and influencing factors. J Aging Environ. 2019;34(3):233–251. doi:10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, et al. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontol. 2012;52(3):357–366. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis T, Albert A. Measuring the user experience. Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. United States of America: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn M, Kang J, Kwon HJ. The concept of aging in place as intention. Gerontol. 2020;60(1):50–59. doi:10.1093/geront/gny167.
   Google Scholar
• World report on ageing and health [Internet]. World Health Organisation (WHO); 2015 [accesed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565042.
   Google Scholar
• Live well throughout life SOU 2008:113. [Bo bra hela livet SOU 2008:113] [Internet]. Government Offices of Sweden (Regeringskansliet); 2008 [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2008/12/sou-2008113/.
   Google Scholar
• Zingmark M, Evertsson B, Haak M. Characteristics of occupational therapy and physiotherapy within the context of reablement in swedish municipalities: a national survey. Health Soc Care Commun. 2020;28(3):1010–1019. doi:10.1111/hsc.12934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninnis K, Van Den Berg M, Lannin NA, et al. Information and communication technology use within occupational therapy home assessments: a scoping review. Br J Occup Ther. 2018;82(3):141–152. doi:10.1177/0308022618786928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowles GD. Housing for older adults. In: Devlin AS, editor. Environmental psychology and human well-being. London: Academic Press; 2018. pp. 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach AE, Moore KM. Aging in place. In: Bengtson VL, Settersten RA, editors. Handbook of theories of aging. New York, United States of America: Springer Publishing Company; 2016. pp. 407–428.
   Google Scholar
• Pani-Harreman KE, Bours GJJW, Zander I, et al. Definitions, key themes and aspects of ‘ageing in place’: a scoping review. Ageing Soc. 2020;41(9):2026–2059. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl H-W. Ecology of Aging. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Germany: Elsevier Ltd; 2015. pp. 884–889.
   Google Scholar
• Housing Adaptions Law SFS 2018:222. [Lag om bostadsanpassningsbidrag SFS 2018:222] [Internet]. Swedish Parliament (Sveriges Riksdag); no date [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2018222-om-bostadsanpassningsbidrag_sfs-2018-222/.
   Google Scholar
• High-Quality and Accessible Healthcare. A Primary Care Reform SOU 2018:39 [God och nära vård. En primärvårdsreform SOU 2018:39] [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish Government (Regeringskansliet); 2018 [accessed 12 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/85abf6c8cfdb401ea6fbd3d17a18c98e/god-och-nara-vard–en-primarvardsreform_sou-2018_39.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roy N, Dubé R, Després C, et al. Choosing between staying at home or moving: a systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189266. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granbom M, Himmelsbach I, Haak M, et al. Residential normalcy and environmental experiences of very old people: changes in residential reasoning over time. J Aging Stud. 2014;29:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Hu W, Guo F. Recent relocation patterns among older adults in the United States. J Am Plann Assoc. 2021;88(1):15–29. doi:10.1080/01944363.2021.1902842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss C, Ekerdt DJ. Residential reasoning and the tug of the fourth age. Gerontol. 2017;57(5):921–929. doi:10.1093/geront/gnw010.
   Google Scholar
• Franco BB, Randle J, Crutchlow L, et al. Push and pull factors surrounding older adults’ relocation to supportive housing: a scoping review. Can J Aging. 2021;40(2):263–281. doi:10.1017/S0714980820000045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granbom M, Nkimbeng M, Roberts LC, et al. So I am stuck, but it s OK": residential reasoning and housing decision-making of low-income older adults with disabilities in Baltimore, Maryland. Hous Soc. 2021;48(1):43–59. doi:10.1080/08882746.2020.1816782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nygren C, Iwarsson S. Negotiating and effectuating relocation to sheltered housing in old age: a Swedish study over 11 years. Eur J Ageing. 2009;6(3):177–189. doi:10.1007/s10433-009-0121-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation: theory and application. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Han Y, Kim B, et al. Aging in place of vulnerable older adults: person–environment fit perspective. J Appl Gerontol. 2017;36(11):1327–1350. doi:10.1177/0733464815617286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golant SM. Explaining the ageing in place realities of older adults. In: Skinner MW, Andrews GJ, Cutchin MPE, editors. Geographical gerontology: perspectives, concepts, approaches. London: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hoh JW, Feng Q, Gu D. Aging in the right place. In: Gu D, Dupre ME, editors. Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 299–303.
   Google Scholar
• Granbom M, Szanton S, Gitlin LN, et al. Ageing in the right place—a prototype of a web-based housing counselling intervention for later life. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(4):289–297. doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1634756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golant SM. The quest for residential normalcy by older adults: relocation but one pathway. J Aging Stud. 2011;25(3):193–205. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25(57):1–132. doi:10.3310/hta25570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin J, Chisnell D. Handbook of usability testing. How to plan, design and conduct effective test, 2nd ed. USA: Wiley publishing; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H. Research methods in human–computer interaction. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley Sons Inc; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Granbom M, Slaug B, Brouneus F, et al. Involving members of the public to develop a data collection app for a citizen science project on housing accessibility targeting older adults. Citizen Sci Theory Pract. 2023;8(1):22. doi:10.5334/cstp.509.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation In Industry. 1995;189.
   Google Scholar
• Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2008;24(6):574–594. doi:10.1080/10447310802205776.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis JR. The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int J Human–Comput Interact. 2018;34(7):577–590. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. 2014 [accessed 2022 Dec 02]. Available from: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/39517/ssoar-2014-mayring-Qualitative_content_analysis_theoretical_foundation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis T, Albert A. Measuring the user experience. Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Burlington, United States of America: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Zingmark M, Björk J, Granbom M, et al. Exploring associations of housing, relocation, and active and healthy aging in Sweden: protocol for a prospective longitudinal mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10(9):e31137. doi:10.2196/31137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makita M, Mas-Bleda A, Stuart E, et al. Ageing, old age and older adults: a social media analysis of dominant topics and discourses. Ageing Soc. 2019;41(2):247–272. doi:10.1017/S0144686X19001016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu W. (Non-)stereotypical representations of older people in swedish authority-managed social media. Ageing Soc. 2020;42(3):719–740. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20001075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markov Č, Yoon Y. Diversity and age stereotypes in portrayals of older adults in popular American primetime television series. Age Soc. 2020;41(12):2747–2767. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loos E, Ivan L. Visual ageism in the media. In: Nelson TD, editor. Ageism: stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cham: Springer; 2004. p. 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Romano Bergstrom JC, Olmsted-Hawala EL, Jans ME. Age-Related differences in eye tracking and usability performance: website usability for older adults. Int J Human-Comput Interact. 2013;29(8):541–548. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.728493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M. The impact of age on website usability. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2014;37:270–282. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• König R, Seifert A, Doh M. Internet use among older europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2018;17(3):621–633. doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsaker A, Hargittai E. A review of internet use among older adults. New Media Soc. 2018;20(10):3937–3954. doi:10.1177/1461444818787348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Weingast SZ. The changing face of aging: characteristics of older adult user groups. Gerontechnology. 2020;19(2):115–124. doi:10.4017/gt.2020.19.2.004.00.
   Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase A, Williams C, Kicevski M, et al. Dividing the grey divide: deconstructing myths About older adults’ online activities, skills, and attitudes. Am Behav Sci. 2018;62(9):1207–1228. doi:10.1177/0002764218777572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedes and the Internet 2022. [Svenskarna och internet 2022] [Internet]. The Swedish internet foundation; 2022. [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/svenskarna-och-internet-2022/.
   Google Scholar
• Lu X, Yao Y, Jin Y. Digital exclusion and functional dependence in older people: findings from five longitudinal cohort studies. E Clin Med. 2022;64:102239. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102239.
   Google Scholar
• Mubarak F, Suomi R. Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. Inquiry. 2022;59:469580221096272. doi:10.1177/00469580221096272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkvall M. Sweden’s languages in numbers - Which languages are spoken and by how many [in swedish: sveriges språk i siffror – vilka språk Talas och av hur många]. Stockholm: Språkrådet Morfem; 2015
   Google Scholar
• Sergeant JF, Ekerdt DJ. Motives for residential mobility in later life. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2008;66(2):131–154. doi:10.2190/AG.66.2.c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House and home searching [Söka bostad] [Internet]. Municipality of Gothenburg (Göteborgs stad); no date [accessed 1 november 2023]. Available from: https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/start/bygga-bo-och-leva-hallbart/bostader-och-lokaler/soka-bostad.
   Google Scholar
• Housing counselling [Bostadsrådgivning] [Internet]. Municipality of Malmö (Malmö stad); no date [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://malmo.se/Bo-och-leva/Bygga-och-bo/Hitta-tomt-och-boende/Bostadsradgivning.html.
   Google Scholar
• After age 60. A description of older people in Sweden. Demographic reports 2022:2. [Internet]. Statistics Sweden; 2022 [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.scb.se/publication/47310.
   Google Scholar
• Lien LL, Steggell CD, Iwarsson S. Adaptive strategies and person-environment fit among functionally limited older adults aging in place: a mixed methods approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(9):11954–11974. doi:10.3390/ijerph120911954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code of Ethics for Occupational Therapists in Sweden [Internet]. The Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists’s; 2018 [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.arbetsterapeuterna.se/media/1633/code_of_ethics_ot_sweden_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walker E, McNamara B. Relocating to retirement living: an occupational perspective on successful transitions. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(6):445–453. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High-quality and accessible healthcare [God och nära vård] [Internet]. National board of Health and Wellfare [Socialstyrelsen]; 2021 [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/kunskapsstod-och-regler/omraden/god-och-nara-vard/.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Jönson H, Deierborg T, et al. ‘Proactive aging’ is a new research approach for a new era. Nat Aging. 2023;3(7):755–756. doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00438-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychetnik L, Hawe P, Waters E, et al. A glossary for evidence based public health. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2004;58(7):538–545. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.011585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidt JCS, Christensen LF, Sibbersen C, et al. Translation and validation of the system usability scale in a Danish mental health setting using digital technologies in treatment interventions. Int J Human–Comput Interact. 2019;36(8):709–716. doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1680922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To procure usability of IoT systems [Säkra användbarhet i upphandling av IoT-system] [Internet]. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR); 2022 [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://skr.se/download/18.2867e67f185050c7b9f1ecb6/1671107894602/Sakra-anvandbarhet-i-upphandling-av-IoT-system.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld JC. System Usability Scale in Swedish [Internet]. 2011. [accessed 1 November 2023]. Available from: https://rosenfeldmedia.com/announcements/sus-svensk-system-usability-sc/.
   Google Scholar