Exploring return to work barriers through the lens of model of human occupation. The NOW WHAT project

References

• Laisné F, Lecomte C, Corbière M. Biopsychosocial predictors of prognosis in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature (corrected and republished). Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1–12. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.729362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Eib C. Sustainable return to work: a systematic review focusing on personal and social factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):679–700. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09832-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White C, Green RA, Ferguson S, et al. The influence of social support and social integration factors on return to work outcomes for individuals with work-related injuries: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(3):636–659. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-09826-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen MB, Indregard A-MR, Øverland S. Workplace bullying and sickness absence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016;42(5):359–370. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenstra IA, Munhall C, Irvin E, et al. Systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work in workers with Sub acute and chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):369–381. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9666-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y-C, Kapellusch J, Garg A. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work. 2014;47(4):553–559. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ervasti J, Joensuu M, Pentti J, et al. Prognostic factors for return to work after depression-related work disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;95:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.07.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vooijs M, Leensen MCJ, Hoving JL, et al. Disease-generic factors of work participation of workers with a chronic disease: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015;88(8):1015–1029. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1025-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerdesteijn KHN, Schaafsma F, Bonefaas-Groenewoud K, et al. Predicting return to work after long-term sickness absence with subjective health complaints: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1095. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09203-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFØ: State budget income and expenses for social purposes 2020. [Internet]. Available from: https://statsregnskapet.dfo.no/inntekter-og-utgifter/formal.
   Google Scholar
• Hultin H, Lindholm C, Möller J. Is there an association between long-term sick leave and disability pension and unemployment beyond the effect of health status? – a cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerxa EJ. Health and the human spirit for occupation. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(6):412–418. doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.6.412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum C, Dunn W. Measuring occupational performance: supporting best practice in occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Grant M, Rees S, Underwood M, et al. Obstacles to returning to work with chronic pain: in-depth interviews with people who are off work due to chronic pain and employers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2877-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, O-Beirne-Elliman J, Froud R, et al. The work of return to work. Challenges of returning to work when you have chronic pain: a meta-ethnography. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue S, Tateishi S, Harada A, et al. Qualitative study of barriers and facilitators encountered by individuals with physical diseases in returning and continuing to work. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08604-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greidanus MA, De Boer AGEM, De Rijk AE, et al. Perceived employer-related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: a systematic review of employers’ and survivors’ perspectives. Psychooncology. 2018;27(3):725–733. doi: 10.1002/pon.4514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosen MCW, Lugtenberg M, Arends I, et al. Barriers and facilitators for return to work from the perspective of workers with common mental disorders with short, medium and long-term sickness absence: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32(2):272–283. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10004-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen EB, Kristiansen M, Bernt Jørgensen SM. Barriers and facilitators to return to work following cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e069091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snippen NC, de Vries HJ, van der Burg-Vermeulen SJ, et al. Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e021742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kielhofner G. Vocational intervention based on the model of human occupation: a review of evidence. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17(3):177–190. doi: 10.3109/11038120903082260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand M-J, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention. New Paradigm for the Management of Occupational Back Pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–360. doi: 10.2165/00115677-200109070-00001.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RR. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation: theory and application. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Braveman B, Robson M, Velozo C, et al. Worker role interview (WRI). Version 10.0. Chicago: The University of Illinois at Chicago; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sandqvist J, Ekbladh E. Applying the model of human occupation to vocational rehabilitation. In: Taylor R, editor. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation, fifth edition – theory and application. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ekbladh E, Fan C-W, Sandqvist J, et al. Work environment impact scale: testing the psychometric properties of the swedish version. Work. 2014;47(2):213–219. doi: 10.3233/WOR-121574.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yngve M, Nyman J, Pihlava J, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the finnish version of the worker role interview (WRI-FI). Scand J Occup Ther. 2023;30(8):1303–1310. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2023.2221999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Désiron HAM, Donceel P, De Rijk A, et al. A conceptual-practice model for occupational therapy to facilitate return to work in breast cancer patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):516–526. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9427-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior S, Maciver D, Aas RW, et al. An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the model of human occupation (MOHO); a prospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02745-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Taylor R, Kielhofner G, et al. Theory use in practice: a national survey of therapists who use the model of human occupation. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62(1):106–117. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.1.106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster AL, Curry LA, Cherlin EJ, et al. Integrating new practices: a qualitative study of how hospital innovations become routine. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0357-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1442–1452. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry LA, Spatz E, Cherlin E, et al. What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(6):384–390. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Moloney M, Fazio A. Embarking on large-scale qualitative research: reaping the benefits of mixed methods in studying youth, clubs and drugs. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2011;28(5-6):433–452. doi: 10.2478/v10199-011-0040-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings P, Prinz C. Sickness and disability systems: comparing outcomes and policies in Norway with those in Sweden, The Netherlands and Switzerland. OECD economics department working papers, no. 1601. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. p. 1–29. doi: 10.1787/c768699b-en.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson EA, Seing I, Sandqvist J, et al. Communication characteristics between clients and stakeholders within the swedish sickness insurance system – a document analysis of granted and withdrawn sickness benefit claims. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(23):3316–3326. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1592247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9690-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakvaag TC, Knapstad M, Bjornestad JR, et al. A scooping review of scandinavian studies of sick-listed and social insurance officers’ experiences of their encounters. Soc Policy Adm. 2022;56(4):595–616. doi: 10.1111/spol.12796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G, Braveman B, Baron K, et al. The model of human occupation: understanding the worker who is injured or disabled. Work. 1999;12(1):37–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowyer P, Kramer J. Evidence for practice from the model of human occupation. In: taylor R, editor. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(4):391–398. doi: 10.1002/nur.20259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt A. Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2010;10(1):113–121. doi: 10.1177/1468794109348686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cachia M, Millward L. The telephone medium and semi-structured interviews: a complementary fit. Qual Res Organ. 2011;6(3):265–277. doi: 10.1108/17465641111188420.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar