Addressing ADL ability in people with poststroke cognitive impairments: A Danish survey of clinical practice

References

• Stark BA, Roth GA, Adebayo OM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):1–16. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• sst.dk/da [Internet]. Sundhedsstyrelsen [Danish Health Authority]. Sygdomsbyrden i Danmark - sygdomme [Burden of Disease in Denmark]. Available from: https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2023/Sygdomsbyrden-2023/Sygdomme-Sygdomsbyrden-2023.ashx. [2022, accessed 2024 January 17].
   Google Scholar
• Stolwyk RJ, Mihaljcic T, Wong DK, et al. Poststroke cognitive impairment negatively impacts activity and participation outcomes a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(2):748–760. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, et al. Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(5–6):408–416. doi:10.1159/000101464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipskaya-Velikovsky L, Zeilig G, Weingarden H, et al. Executive functioning and daily living of individuals with chronic stroke: measurement and implications. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(2):122–127. doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turunen KEA, Laari SPK, Kauranen TV, et al. Domain-specific cognitive recovery after first-ever stroke: a 2-year follow-up. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24(2):117–127. doi:10.1017/S1355617717000728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor A, Lanctôt KL, Bayley M, et al. ‘Good outcome’ isn’t good enough: cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms, and social restrictions in physically recovered stroke patients. Stroke. 2017;48(6):1688–1690. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(9):1288–1294. doi:10.1111/ene.12743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing M, Bragge P, Ponsford J. Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a survey of current practice in Australia. Brain Impairment. 2019;20(1):24–36. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2018.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer AY. Cognitive rehabilitation practice patterns: a survey of American hospital association rehabilitation programs. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17(1):34–44. doi:10.1076/clin.17.1.34.15625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty J, Ablewhite J, Nair R D, et al. Results of a UK-wide vignette study with occupational therapists to explore cognitive screening post stroke. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2020;27(7):1–12. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2019.0064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson E, Koh CL, Eames S, et al. Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;3(3):CD006430. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006430.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richards LG, Latham NK, Jette DU, et al. Characterizing occupational therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12):S51–S60. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansonetti D, Hoffmann T. Cognitive assessment across the continuum of care: the importance of occupational performance-based assessment for individuals post-stroke and traumatic brain injury. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(5):334–342. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Barrett-Bernstein S, Bibas G, et al. National survey of Canadian occupational therapists’ assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment post-stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58(4):241–250. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00943.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington E, Whitehead P, Li Z, et al. An audit of dressing practice by occupational therapists in acute stroke settings in England. Br J Occup Ther. 2020;83(11):664–673. doi:10.1177/0308022620926103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon-Nair A, Korner-Bitensky N, Ogourtsova T. Occupational therapists’ identification, assessment, and treatment of unilateral spatial neglect during stroke rehabilitation in Canada. Stroke. 2007;38(9):2556–2562. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild K, Fleming J, Copley JA. Assessments of functional cognition used with patients following traumatic brain injury in acute care: a survey of Australian occupational therapists. Occup Ther Health Care. 2023;37(1):145–163. doi:10.1080/07380577.2021.2020389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigen L, Bjørk E, Lund A, et al. Assessment of clients with cognitive impairments: a survey of Norwegian occupational therapists in municipal practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25(2):88–98. doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1272633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond A, Whitehead P, Fellows K, et al. Occupational therapy predischarge home visits for patients with a stroke: what is national practice? Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75(9):396–402. doi:10.4276/030802212X13470263980711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh CL, Hoffmann T, Bennett S, et al. Management of patients with cognitive impairment after stroke: a survey of Australian occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009;56(5):324–331. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00764.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilegaard M, Pilegaard B, Birn I, et al. Assessment of occupational performance problems due to cognitive deficits in stroke rehabilitation: a survey…including commentary by morgan MFG. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;21(6):280–288. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.6.280.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerfull practice. A model for authentic occupational therapy. Fort Collins, CO: Center for Innovative OT Solutions, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R, Taylor R. Kielhofner’s model of human occupation - theory and application. 5th ed. Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• etf.dk [Internet]. Ergoterapeutforeningen [Danish Association of Occupational Therapists]. Ergoterapeuter i tal [Occupational Therapists in Numbers]. Available from: https://www.etf.dk/Om-ETF/Ergoterapeuter-i-tal. [2023, accessed 2024 January 17].
   Google Scholar
• etf.dk [Internet]. Ergoterapeutforeningen [Danish Association of Occupational Therapists]. Om Ergoterapeutforeningen [About the Danish Association of Occupational Therapists]. Available from: https://www.etf.dk/mere/om-etf. [accessed 2023 Feb 15].
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348(3):g1687–g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• project-redcap.org [Internet]. Research electronic data capture; 2022. Available from: https://www.project-redcap.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. 2nd ed. Ottawa (Canada): CAOT, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Affolter FD. Perception, interaction and language. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chen P, Chen CC, Hreha K, et al. Kessler foundation neglect assessment process uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(5):869–876.e1. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, et al. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(5):531–536. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, De Witte L, Andrich R, et al. IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technol Disability. 2000;13(2):105–115. doi:10.3233/TAD-2000-13203.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalchuk Horn K, Jennings S, Richardson G, et al. The patient-specific functional scale: psychometrics, clinimetrics, and application as a clinical outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(1):30–42. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Bray Jones K. Assessment of motor and process skills. Volume 1: development, standardazation and administration manual. 7th rev. ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Bray Jones K. Asessment of motor and process skills. Volume 2: user manual. 8th ed. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Árnadóttir G. Brain and behavior: assessing cortical dysfunction through activities of daily living. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Wæhrens EE, Kottorp A, Nielsen KT. Measuring self-reported ability to perform activities of daily living: a rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):243. doi:10.1186/s12955-021-01880-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, et al. The oxford cognitive screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(3):883–894. doi:10.1037/pas0000082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM). 5th Edition-Revised. Ottawa, Canada: COPM Inc., 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wæhrens EE. ADL taxonomien (the ADL taxonomy). Danish edition. Copenhagen: ergoterapeutforeningen, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• sst.dk/da [Internet]. Sundhedsstyrelsen [Danish Health Authority]. Anbefalinger til nationale redskaber til vurdering af funktionsevne - hos voksne med erhvervet hjerneskade. Available from: https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2020/anbefalinger-til-nationale-redskaber-til-vurdering-af-funktionsevne–-voksne-m-erhvervet-hjerneskade [accessed 2024 Jan 17].
   Google Scholar
• Katz N, Erez ABH, Livni L, et al. Dynamic lowenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment: evaluation of potential to change in cognitive performance. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66(2):207–214. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.002469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari C, Dawson DR. Executive functions and real-world performance: how good are we at distinguishing people with acquired brain injury from healthy controls? OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2011;31(1):S61–S68. doi:10.3928/15394492-20101108-10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesson J, Clemson L, Brodaty H, et al. Estimating functional cognition in older adults using observational assessments of task performance in complex everyday activities: a systematic review and evaluation of measurement properties. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:335–360. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• rcplondon.ac.uk [Internet]. Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guideline for stroke. Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/stroke-guidelines. 2016).
   Google Scholar
• healthquality.va.gov [Internet]. VA/DOD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals From the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery Following stroke; 6th edition update 2019. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(7):763–788. doi:10.1177/1747493019897843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang NYH, Zhou D, Chung RCK, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review from 1997 through 2012. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:187. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luaute J, Halligan P, Rode G, et al. Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(7):961–982. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce SR, Buxbaum LJ. Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):256–268. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.27333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Trombly CA. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, part II: remediation of impairments. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(3):260–274. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.3.260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• informme.org.au [Internet]. Stroke Foundation. The Australian and New Zealand clinical guidelines for stroke management; 2021. Available from: https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management.
   Google Scholar
• Vahlberg B, Hellström K. Treatment and assessment of neglect after stroke – from a physiotherapy perspective: a systematic review. Adv Physiother. 2008;10(4):178–187. doi:10.1080/14038190701661239.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, et al. Evidence-Based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(8):1515–1533. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley MT, Janzen S, Harnett A, et al. INCOG 2.0 guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: what’s changed From 2014 to now? J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023;38(1):1–6. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• strokeguideline.org [Internet]. National Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland. London: intercollegiate Stroke Working Party; 2023. www.strokeguideline.org. [accessed 2023 Aug 11].
   Google Scholar
• sst.dk/da [Internet]. Sundhedsstyrelsen [Danish Health Authority]. Anbefalinger for tværsektorielle forløb for voksne med erhvervet hjerneskade - apopleksi og transitorisk cerebral iskæmi (TCI) - traume, infektion, tumor, subarachnoidalblødning og encephalopat (version 2); 2021. Available from: https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2020/Anbefalinger-for-tvaersektorielle-forloeb-for-voksne-med-erhvervet-hjerneskade. [accessed 2024 Jan 17].
   Google Scholar
• Putman K, de Wit L, Schupp W, et al. Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: a comparison between four European rehabilitation centres. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(22):1417–1424. doi:10.1080/09638280600638216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke DJ, Burton LJ, Tyson SF, et al. Why do stroke survivors not receive recommended amounts of active therapy? Findings from the ReAcT study, a mixed-methods case-study evaluation in eight stroke units. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(8):1119–1132. doi:10.1177/0269215518765329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Tooth L, McKenna K, et al. Perceptions of evidence-based practice: a survey of Australian occupational therapists. Aust Occup Therapy J. 2003;50(1):13–22. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1630.2003.00341.x.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley A, Horner K. Questionnaire surveys - sources of error and implications for design, reporting and appraisal. Br Dent J. 2021;230(4):251–258. doi:10.1038/s41415-021-2654-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• regioner.dk [Internet]. Danske Regioner [Danish Regions]. Om de fem regioner [About the five Danish regions]. Available from: https://www.regioner.dk/om-os/om-de-fem-regioner/. [accessed 2024 Jan 15].
   Google Scholar