333
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Rasch analysis of the Danish version of the occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ11)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2327356 | Received 25 Nov 2022, Accepted 04 Mar 2024, Published online: 18 Mar 2024

References

  • Christiansen C. Three perspectives on balance in occupation. In: Zemke R, Clark F, editors. Occupational science: the evolving discipline. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1996. p. 1–10.
  • Eklund M, Orban K, Argentzell E, et al. The linkage between patterns of daily occupations and occupational balance: applications within occupational science and occupational therapy practice. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(1):41–56. doi:10.1080/11038128.2016.1224271.
  • Wagman P, Håkansson C, Björklund A. Occupational balance as used in occupational therapy: a concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(4):322–327. doi:10.3109/11038128.2011.596219.
  • Wagman P, Håkansson C. Introducing the occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ). Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(3):227–231. doi:10.3109/11038128.2014.900571.
  • Håkansson C, Wagman P, Hagell P. Construct validity of a revised version of the occupational balance questionnaire. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(6):441–449. doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1660801.
  • Günal A, Pekçetin S, Demirtürk F, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ11-T). Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(7):493–499. doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1673479.
  • Dhas BN, Wagman P, Marji FA, et al. Translation and initial validation of the occupational balance questionnaire to Arabic—occupational balance questionnaire-A. Brit J Occup Ther. 2021;85(7):533–540
  • Yu Y, Manku M, Backman CL. Measuring occupational balance and its relationship to perceived stress and health: Mesurer l’équilibre occupationnel et sa relation avec le stress perçus et la santé. Can J Occup Ther. 2018;85(2):117–127. doi:10.1177/0008417417734355.
  • Bonsaksen T, Lindstad MØ, Håkansson C, et al. Rasch analysis of the Norwegian version of the occupational balance questionnaire in a sample of occupational therapy students. Occup Ther Int. 2021;2021:8863453–8863411. doi:10.1155/2021/8863453.
  • Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M. Rasch models in health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007; 46(Pt 1):1–18. doi:10.1348/014466506x96931.
  • Mckenna PS, Wilburn J, et al. Adapting patient-reported outcome measures for use in new languages and cultures. In: Christensen K, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, editors. Rasch models in health. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
  • Retsinformation. Law regarding ethical accreditation of health sciences research projects; Chapter 4, § 14, 2 (In Danish: Lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter) 2011 [cited 2022 November 18th]. Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/r0710.aspx?id=137674#Kap4.
  • de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: cambridge University Press; 2011.
  • Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, et al. RUMM2030. Perth: RUMM Laboratory Pty; 2010.
  • Hagquist C, Bruce M, Gustavsson JP. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(3):380–393. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.007.
  • Andrich D, Sheridan B. RUMM2030 manual. Perth, Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2009.
  • Curtis D. Person misfit in attitude surveys: Influences, impacts and implications. International Edu J. 2004;5:125–144.
  • Marais I, Andrich D. Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional rasch model. J Appl Meas. 2008;9(3):200–215.
  • Hagquist C, Andrich D. Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the rasch model. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):181. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0755-0.
  • Hagell P. Testing rating scale unidimensionality using the principal component analysis (PCA)/t-test protocol with the Rasch model: the primacy of theory over statistics. OJS. 2014;04(06):456–465. doi:10.4236/ojs.2014.46044.
  • Smith E. Understanding Rasch measurement: detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal components analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–231.
  • Hagell P, Westergren A. Sample size and statistical conclusions from tests of fit to the rasch model according to the Rasch unidimensional measurement model (RUMM) program in health outcome measurement. J Appl Meas. 2016;17(4):416–431.
  • Chen W, Lenderking W, Jin Y, et al. Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):485–493. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0487-5.
  • Lee WL, Chinna K, Lim Abdullah K, et al. The forward-backward and dual-panel translation methods are comparable in producing semantic equivalent versions of a heart quality of life questionnaire. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019;25(1):e12715. n/a.
  • Su C, Parham LD. Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(5):581–585. 5p. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.5.581.
  • Peña ED. Lost in translation: methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Dev. 2007;78(4):1255–1264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01064.x.
  • Uhrmann L, Hovengen I, Wagman P, et al. The Norwegian occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ11-N) – development and pilot study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;26(7):546–551. doi:10.1080/11038128.2018.1523458.
  • DST. Befolkningens uddannelsesstatus. Danish Statistics; 2016. Available from: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/emner/befolkningens-uddannelsesstatus.
  • Wæhrens EE, Amris K, Bartels EM, et al. Agreement between touch-screen and paper-based patient-reported outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized cross-over reproducibility study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2015;44(6):503–510. doi:10.3109/03009742.2015.1029517.