Construct validity of the simplified Chinese version of the instrument ‘Picture My Participation’

References

• Gutenbrunner C, et al. The global disability action plan 2014-2021 of the world health organisation (WHO): a major step towards better health for all people with disabilities. Chance and challenge for physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huus K, Schlebusch L, Ramaahlo M, et al. Barriers and facilitators to participation for children and adolescents with disabilities in low- and Middle-income countries – a scoping review. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10:e1–e10. doi:10.4102/ajod.v10i0.771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):16–25. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M, et al. Definitions and operationalization of mental health problems, wellbeing and participation constructs in children with NDD: distinctions and clarifications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao YT, et al. Understanding the participation in home, school, and community activities reported by children with disabilities and their parents: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(12):2217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health: children and youth version: ICF-CY. Icf-cy. 2007, Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M. Participation–challenges in conceptualization, measurement and intervention. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(4):470–473. doi:10.1111/cch.12080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster W, Bedell G, Law M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(11):1030–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04094.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz G, Lazcano-Ponce E. Intellectual disability: definition, etiological factors, classification, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(Suppl 2):S132–S41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, et al. Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(2):419–436. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson AK, Wilder J. Frequency of occurrence and child presence in family activities: a quantitative, comparative study of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and children with typical development. Int J Dev Disabil. 2013;60(1):13–25. doi:10.1179/2047387712Y.0000000008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Shields N, Imms C, et al. Participation of children with intellectual disability compared with typically developing children. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(5):1854–1862. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels A, et al. Children in South Africa with and without intellectual disabilities’ rating of their frequency of participation in everyday activities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Granlund M, Wang L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to participation in everyday activities for children with intellectual disabilities in China. Child Care Health Dev. 2022;49(2):346–356. doi:10.1111/cch.13052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovig KH, Skivenes M. Child rights and international discrimination law: implementing article 2 of the UN convention on the rights of the child. 2019. New York (NY): Routledge Research in International Law, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huus K, Granlund M, Bornman J, et al. Human rights of children with intellectual disabilities: comparing self-ratings and proxy ratings. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(6):1010–1017. doi:10.1111/cch.12244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Qiu Z, Wong D, et al. The research on the status, rehabilitation, education, vocational development, social integration and support services related to intellectual disability in China. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(6):1216–1222. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Dada S, Granlund M, et al. Content validity and usefulness of picture My participation for measuring participation in children with and without intellectual disability in South Africa and Sweden. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(5):336–348. doi:10.1080/11038128.2019.1645878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Murphy J. Enabling young people with a learning disability to make choices at a time of transition. Brit J Learn Disabil. 2002;30(3):105–112. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3156.2002.00165.x.
   Google Scholar
• Imms CG, Bornman M, Elliott J. C. Picture My Participation! Initial development of a participation measurement tool for use in low and Middle income countries. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:25–25.
   Google Scholar
• Khetani M, Marley J, Baker M, et al. Validity of the participation and environment measure for children and youth (PEM-CY) for health impact assessment (HIA) in sustainable development projects. Disabil Health J. 2014;7(2):226–235. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontes TB, Silva BM, Sousa JG, et al. Measuring children activity repertoire: is the paediatric activity card sort a good tool for Brazilian therapists? Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2016;24(3):435–445. doi:10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAO0754.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffel A, Berg C. Spanish translation and validation of the preschool activity card sort. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28(2):171–189. doi:10.1080/01942630802031859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim CY, Law M, Khetani M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the young children’s participation and environment measure (YC-PEM) for use in Singapore. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(3):316–328. doi:10.1080/01942638.2017.1347911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson P, Dada S, Granlund M, et al. Structural validity and internal consistency of Picture My Participation: a measure for children with disability. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10:e1–e8. doi:10.4102/ajod.v10i0.763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balton S, Arvidsson P, Granlund M, et al. Test-retest reliability of Picture My Participation in children with intellectual disability in South Africa. Scand J Occup Ther. 2022;29(4):315–324. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1856922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Granlund M, Zhao Y, et al. Transcultural adaptation, content validity and reliability of the instrument ‘Picture My Participation’ for children and youth with and without intellectual disabilities in mainland China. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(2):147–157. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1817976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst F. The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):152; author reply 152. author reply 152-152; author reply 152. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss ME, Smith GT. Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5(1):1–25. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). 2001;Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Bunning K, Alder R, Proudman L, et al. Co-production and pilot of a structured interview using talking mats® to survey the television viewing habits and preferences of adults and young people with learning disabilities. Brit J Learn Disabil. 2017;45(1):1–11. doi:10.1111/bld.12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch WH. Exploratory factor analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. 2020. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Çokluk Ö, Koçak D. Using horn’s parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Educational Sciences: theory & Practice. 2016;16(2):537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reio TG, Shuck B. Exploratory factor analysis: implications for theory, research, and practice. Adv Dev Hum Resour. 2015;17(1):12–25. doi:10.1177/1523422314559804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I, Ishtiaq S. Reliability and validity: importance in medical research. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(10):2401–2406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huus K, Morwane R, Ramaahlo M, et al. Voices of children with intellectual disabilities on participation in daily activities. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10:792. doi:10.4102/ajod.v10i0.792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar