Does the mode of anesthesia affect the feto-maternal outcome in category-1 caesarean section? A prospective non-randomized study comparing spinal versus general anesthesia

References

• Kandil M. The skyrocketing rate of cesarean section in Egypt. Glob Drugs Therap. 2018;3(4). doi: 10.15761/GDT.1000153
   Google Scholar
• Lucas DN1, Sm Y, Sm K, Holdcroft A, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000;93(7):346‑50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, et al. Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. Bmj. 2011;343(nov23 1):d7108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinsella SM, Walton B, Sashidharan R, et al. Category‑1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri‑operative management in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(4):362‑8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean Section–A continuum of risk (Good practice no. 11). (2010)
   Google Scholar
• Algert CS, Bowen JR, Giles WB, et al. Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study. BMC Med. 2009;71:20. PMID: 19402884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prakash S, Singh K, Loha S, et al. Comparative study for maternal and fetal outcome in spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for LSCS. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2015 Nov;6:7443–7446.
   Google Scholar
• Kolås T, Saugstad OD, Daltveit AK, et al. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1538–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakowski MI, Geller A. The placenta anatomy, physiology and transfer of drugs. In: Chestnut H, Wong C, Tesn L, et al., editors. Chestnut’s obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2014. p. 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann M, Calderbank S. Mode of anaesthetic for category 1 caesarean sections and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(4):316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangaswamy CR, Kundra P, Velayudhan S, et al. Influence of anaesthetic technique on maternal and foetal outcome in category 1 caesarean sections–A prospective single-centre observational study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(11):844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shek NW, Lao TT, Chan KK. Mode of anaesthesia on fetal acid-base status at caesarean section. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(6):653–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaesthesiology HF, Zahir J. Maternal and neonatal outcome after spinal versus general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2011;7(3):115–118.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay S, Das A, Pahari S. Fetomaternal outcome in severe preeclamptic women undergoing emergency cesarean section under either general or spinal anesthesia. J Pregnancy. 2014 January 1;2014:2014.
   Google Scholar
• Edipoglu IS, Celik F, Marangoz EC, et al. Effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia.Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American society of anesthesiologists task force on obstetric anesthesia.Anesthesiology.2007;106(4):843–863. PMID: 17413923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouch ZY, Dakik CG, White WD, et al. Anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery and neonatal acid-base status: a retrospective database analysis. PMID: 25499813 Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;241:22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. PMID: 15960713 Anaesthesia. 2005;60 7:636–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Sriprajittichai P, et al. The incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia associated with spinal anesthesia. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(Suppl 3):S58–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havas F, Orhan Sungur M, Yenigün Y, et al. Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section is associated with shorter hospital stay compared to general anesthesia. Agri. 2013 January 1;25(2):55–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar