Demographic costs of sex allocation: hermaphrodites perform better in sparse populations

References

• Åkesson B. 1976. Morphology and life cycle of Ophryotrocha diadema, a new polychaete species from California. Ophelia 15:25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Åkesson B. 1982. A life table study on three genetic strains of Ophryotrocha diadema (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae). International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction 5:59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthes N, David P, Auld JR, Hoffer JNA, Jarne P, Koene JM, Kokko H, Lorenzi MC, Pélissié B, Sprenger D, Staikou A, Schärer L. 2010. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: An extended approach to quantify sexual selection. American Naturalist 176:249–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer VS, Schärer L, Michiels NK. 2007. Phenotypically flexible sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 61:216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang AT, Sih A. 2013. Multilevel selection and effects of keystone hyperaggressive males on mating success and behavior in stream water striders. Behavioral Ecology 24:1166–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnov EL. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Bona V, Lorenzi MC, Sella G. 2010. Functional males in pair mating outcrossing populations of hermaphroditic animals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100:451–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer EA. 1980. The relationship between mating system and simultaneous hermaphroditism in the coral reef fish, Hypoplectrus nigricans (Serranidae). Animal Behaviour 28:988–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin G. 1968. Tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland B, Rice WR. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96:5083–5088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell DC. 2010. Statistical methods for psychology. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes RN, Manríquez PH, Bishop JDD. 2002. Female investment is retarded pending reception of allosperm in a hermaphroditic colonial invertebrate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:14884–14886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard JL. 1993. Sexual conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites: Evidence from serranid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36:135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard JL. 2005. Bateman’s principle and simultaneous hermaphrodites: A paradox. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45:856–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard JL. 2006. Sexual selection: Lessons from hermaphrodite mating systems. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46:349–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard JL. 2013. Sexual selection and hermaphroditic organisms: Testing theory. Current Zoology 59:579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locher R, Baur B. 2002. Nutritional stress changes sex specific reproductive allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic land snail Arianta arbustorum. Functional Ecology 16:623–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi MC, Schleicherová D, Sella G. 2006. Life history and sex allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema: The role of sperm competition. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46:381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi MC, Schleicherová D, Sella G. 2008. Sex adjustments are not functionally costly in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Marine Biology 153:599–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi MC, Schleicherová D, Sella G. 2013. Multiple paternity and mate competition in non-selfing, monogamous, egg-trading hermaphrodites. Acta Ethologica in press. doi:10.1007/s10211-013-0169-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi MC, Sella G. 2008. A measure of sexual selection in hermaphroditic animals: Parentage skew and the opportunity for selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:827–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi MC, Sella G, Schleicherová D, Ramella L 2005. Outcrossing hermaphroditic polychaete worms adjust their sex allocation to social conditions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1341–1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minetti C, Sella G, Lorenzi MC. 2013. Population size, not density, serves as cue for sex ratio adjustments in polychaete worms. Italian Journal of Zoology. doi:10.1080/11250003.2013.841775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premoli MC, Sella G. 1995. Sex economy in benthic polychaetes. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 7:27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevedelli D, Massamba N’Siala G, Simonini R. 2006. Gonochorism vs. hermaphroditism: Relationship between life history and fitness in three species of Ophryotrocha (Polychaeta: Dorvilleidae) with different forms of sexuality. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimondi PT, Martin JE. 1991. Evidence that mating group size affects allocation of reproductive resources in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. American Naturalist 138:1206–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece SE, Drew DR, Gardner A. 2008. Sex ratio adjustment and kin discrimination in malaria parasites. Nature 453:609–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schärer L, Janicke T. 2009. Sex allocation and sexual conflict in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Biology Letters 5:705–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicherová D, Lorenzi MC, Sella G. 2006. How outcrossing hermaphrodites sense the presence of conspecifics and suppress female allocation. Behavioual Ecology 17:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicherová D, Lorenzi MC, Sella G. 2013. Do stable environments select against phenotypic plasticity in hermaphroditic sex allocation? Italian Journal of Zoology 80:358–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicherová D, Lorenzi MC, Sella G, Michiels NK. 2010. Gender expression and group size: A test in a hermaphroditic and a gonochoric congeneric species of Ophryotrocha (Polychaeta). Journal of Experimental Biology 213:1586–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella G. 1985. Reciprocal egg trading and brood care in a hermaphroditic polychaete worm. Animal Behaviour 33:938–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella G. 1988. Reciprocation, reproductive success and safeguards against cheating in the mating system of a hermaphroditic polychaete worm, Ophryotrocha diadema. Biological Bullettin 175:212–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella G, Lorenzi MC. 2000. Partner fidelity and egg reciprocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema. Behavioural Ecology 11:260–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella G, Lorenzi MC. 2003. Increased sperm allocation delays body growth in a protandrous simultaneous hermaphrodite. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78:149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella G, Marzona M. 1983. Inheritance, maternal influence and biochemical analysis of an egg color polymorphism in Ophryotrocha diadema. Experientia 39:97–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sella G, Ramella L. 1999. Sexual conflict and mating system in the dorvilleid genus Ophryotrocha and the dinophilid genus Dinophilus. Hydrobiologia 402:203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns SC, Hoekstra RF. 2000. Evolution – an introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan GN, Govedich FR, Burd M. 2004. Social group size, potential sperm competition and reproductive investment in a hermaphroditic leech, Helobdella papillornata (Euhirudinea: Glossiphoniidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:574–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouvé S, Jourdane J, Renaud F, Durand P, Morand S. 1999. Adaptive sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 53:1599–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade MJ. 1977. An experimental study of group selection. Evolution 31:134–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar