Distinguishing sex of free-ranging tigers using pugmark measurements

References

• Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. Revised survey of forest types of India. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin N, Bastoni S, Siswomartono D, Manansang J, Tilson R. 1999. Using tiger stripes to identify individual tigers. In: Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P, editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge: University Press. pp. 138–139.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia KP, Ortiz JC, Vidal M, Rau JR. 2010. Morphometrics of the tracks of Puma concolor: is it possible to differentiate the sexes using measurements from captive animals? Zoological Studies 49:577–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogate MG, Joshi PA, Gore AP, Paranjape SA. 1989. Tiger pugmark studies: a statistical perspective. Tech. Bulletin No. 2, Directorate, Project Tiger. Melghat, Paratwada, Maharashtra.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon C, Stewart AM, Meijaard E. 2007. Correspondence regarding ‘Clouded leopards, the secretive top-carnivore of South-East Asian rainforests: their distribution, status and conservation needs in Sabah, Malaysia’. BMC Ecology 7:5. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-7-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grigione MM, Burman P, Bleich VC, Pierce BM. 1999. Identifying individual mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks: refinement of an innovative technique. Biological Conservation 88:25–32. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00096-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanth KU, Nichols JD. 2002. Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Bangalore, India: Center for Wildlife Studies. pp. 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Karanth KU, Nichols JD, Seidenstricker J, Dinerstein E, Smith JLD, McDougal C, Johnsingh AJT, Chundawat RS, Thapar V. 2003. Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India. Animal Conservation 6:141–146. doi:10.1017/S1367943003003184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewison R, Fitzhugh EL, Galentine SP. 2001. Validation of a rigorous track classification technique: identifying individual mountain lions. Biological Conservation 99:313–321. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00197-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougal C. 1999. You can tell some tigers by their tracks with confidence. In: Seidensticker J, Christie S, Jackson P, editors. Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes. Cambridge: University Press. pp. 190–191.
   Google Scholar
• Panwar HS. 1979. A note on tiger census technique based on pugmark tracings. Indian Forester (Spec. Issue) 105:70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Panwar HS. 1980. A note on tiger census technique based on pugmark tracings. Cheetal 22:40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Paranjape SA, Gore AP, Gogate MG. 1993. Application of Bhattacharya technique in gender determination and gender ratio estimation of tigers from pugmarks. Indian Forester 119:793–797.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar SR, Singh LAK. 1993. Technique to distinguish gender of tiger (Panthera tigris) from pugmarks. Indian Forester 117:24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Jhala Y, Sawarkar VB. 2003. Gender discrimination of tigers by using their pugmarks. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:258–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Jhala Y, Sawarkar VB. 2005. Identification of individual tigers (Panthera tigris) from their pugmarks. Journal of Zoology 267:9–18. doi:10.1017/S0952836905007119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh LAK. 1999. Tracking tigers. Guidelines for estimating wild tiger population using the pugmark technique. New Delhi: WWF Tiger Conservation Programme. 38 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Singh R, Krausman PR, Pandey P, Qureshi Q, Sankar K, Goyal SP, Tripathi A. 2014. First parturition of tigers in a semi-arid habitat, western India. European Journal of Wildlife Research 60:383–386. doi:10.1007/s10344-013-0784-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Majumder A, Sankar K, Qureshi Q, Goyal SP, Nigam P. 2013a. Interbirth interval and litter size of free-ranging Bengal tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) in dry tropical deciduous forests of India. European Journal of Wildlife Research 59:629–636. doi:10.1007/s10344-013-0713-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Qureshi Q, Sankar K, Krausman PR, Goyal SP. 2013b. Use of camera traps to determine dispersal of tigers in semi-arid landscape, western India. Journal of Arid Environments 98:105–108. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood KS, Fitzhugh EL. 1993. A rigorous technique for identifying individual mountain lions Felis concolor by their tracks. Biological Conservation 65:51–59. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90196-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS. 2007. SPSS for windows. Version 16.0. Chicago: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS Science. 1998. SigmaScan and SigmaScanPro user’s manual for version 4. Chicago: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Stander PE. 1998. Spoor counts as indices of large carnivore populations: the relationship between spoor frequency, sampling effort and true density. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:378–385. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00313.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson GJ, Delahay RJ. 2001. A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observations. Wildlife Research 28:151–164. doi:10.1071/WR00033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilting A, Fischer F, Bakar SA, Linsenmair KE. 2006. Clouded leopards, the secretive top-carnivore of South-East Asian rainforests: their distribution, status and conservation needs in Sabah Malaysia. BMC Ecology 6:16. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-6-16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar