Pollination biology in an endangered rocky mountain toadflax (Linaria cavanillesii)

References

• AffreL, ThompsonJ D. 1997. Population genetic structure and levels of inbreeding depression in the Mediterranean island endemic Cyclamen creticum (Primulaceae). Biol J Lin Soc. 60: 527–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnstettM C, Hossaert-McKeyM, KjellbergF. 1997. Figs and fig pollinators: Evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism. Trends Ecol Evol. 12: 94–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArnoldR M. 1982. Pollination, predation and seed set in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Am Midl Nat. 107: 360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerH G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. Evolution. 9: 347–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BañaresA, BlancaG, GüemesJ, MorenoJ C, OrtizS. 2004. Atlas y Libro Rojo de la Flora Vascular Amenazada de España. Madrid: Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza.
   Google Scholar
• BorbaE L, SemirJ. 2001. Pollinator specificity and convergence in fly-pollinated Pleurothallis (Orchidaceae) species: a multiple population approach. Ann Bot. 88: 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoschM, SimónJ, RoviraA M, MoleroJ, BlanchéC. 2002. Pollination ecology of the pre-Pyrenean endemic Petrocoptis montsicciana (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of population size. Biol J Linn Soc. 76: 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CabezudoB, TalaveraS, BlancaG, SalazarC, CuetoM, ValdésB, Hernández-BermejoE, HerreraC M, Rodríguez-HiraldoC, NavasD. 2005. Lista Roja de la Flora Vascular de Andalucia. Sevilla: Consejeria de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucia.
   Google Scholar
• CarpenterF L, RecherH F. 1979. Pollination, reproduction and fire. Am Nat. 113: 871–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrióE, JiménezJ F, Sánchez-GómezP, GüemesJ. 2009. Reproductive biology and conservation implications of three endangered snapdragon species (Antirrhinum, Plantaginaceae). Biol Cons. 142: 1854–1863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChampagnatM. 1954. Pélorie et autostérilité dans une souche de Linaria reflexa Desf. Le Monde des Plantes. 11: 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• CharlesworthD, CharlesworthB. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 18: 237–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorbetS A. 1990. Pollination and the weather. Isr J Bot. 39: 13–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrudenR W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: A conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution. 31: 32–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Clerck-FloateR A, HarrisP. 2002. Linaria dalmatica (L.) Miller, Dalmatian toadflax (Scrophulariaceae). Biological control programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. MasonP G, HuberJ T. Wallingford: CAB International. 368–374.
   Google Scholar
• DochertyZ. 1982. Self-incompatibility in Linaria. Heredity. 49: 349–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DomínguezF, GaliciaD, MorenoL, MorenoJ C, SáinzH. 1996. Threatened plants in peninsular and balearic Spain: A report based on the EU habitats directive. Biol Cons. 76: 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DufaÿM, AnstettM C. 2003. Conflicts between plants and pollinators that reproduce within inflorescences: Evolutionary variations on a theme. Oikos. 100: 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-CasasJ, CeballosA. 1982. Plantas silvestres de la Península Ibérica (rupícolas). Madrid: H. Blume Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• FisogniA, CristofoliniG, PoddaL, GalloniM. 2011. Reproductive ecology in the endemic Primula apennina Widmer (Primulaceae). Plant Biosyst. 145: 355–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarcíaM B. 2003. Demographic viability of a relict population of the critically endangered plant Borderea chouardii. Cons Biol. 17: 1672–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GómezJ. 2005. Plantas de interés del NE de la provincia de Albacete e inmediaciones de la provincia de Valencia (I). Sabuco. 5: 151–177.
   Google Scholar
• GoodwillieC, KaliszS, EckertC G. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36: 47–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HayesC N, WinsorJ A, StephensonA G. 2005. Environmental variation influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). J Evol Biol. 18: 147–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerlihyC R, EckertC G. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature. 416: 320–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HongD Y. 1983. The distribution of Scrophulariaceae in the holarctic with special reference to the floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North-America. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 70: 701–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HusbandB C, SchemskeD W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution. 50: 54–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JaimesI, RamírezN. 1999. Breeding systems in a secondary deciduous forest in Venezuela: the importance of form, habitat, and pollination specificity. Plant Syst Evol. 215: 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KarronJ D. 1991. Patterns of genetic variation and breeding systems in rare plant species. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. FalkD A, HolsingerK E. New York: Oxford University Press. 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• KearnsC A, InouyeD W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologist. NiwotColorado: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• KevanP G. 1975. Sun-tracking solar furnaces in high arctic flowers: Significance for pollination and insects. Science. 189: 723–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoelewijnH P, van DammeJ MM. 2005. Effects of seed size, inbreeding and maternal sex on offspring fitness in gynodioecious Plantago coronopus. J Ecol. 93: 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LagunaE, CrespoM B, MateoG, LópezS, FabregatC, SerraL, Herrero-BorgoñónJ J, CarreteroJ L, AguilellaA, FiguerolaR. 1998. Valencia: Flora endémica, rara o amenazada de la Comunidad Valenciana. Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Medio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• LarsonD W, MatthesU, KellyP E. 2000. Cliff ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pattern and process in cliff ecosystems.
   Google Scholar
• LavergneS, ThompsonJ D, GarnierE, DebusscheM. 2004. The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: A comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs. Oikos. 107: 505–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartinF W. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology. 34: 125–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClayA S, de Clerck-FloateR A. 2002. Linaria vulgaris Miller, Yelow toadflax (Scrophulariaceae). Biological control programmes in Canada, 1981–2000. MasonP G, HuberJ T. Wallingford: CAB International. 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• MédailF, VerlaqueR. 1997. Ecological characteristics and rarity of endemic plants from southeast France and Corsica: Implications for biodiversity conservation. Biol Cons. 80: 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MichalskiS G, DurkaW. 2007. High selfing and high inbreeding depression in peripheral populations of Juncus atratus. Mol Ecol. 16: 4715–4727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MünzbergováZ, PlačkováI. 2010. Seed mass and population characteristics performance of Scorzonera hispanica under common garden conditions. Flora. 8: 552–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NadeauL B, KingJ. R. 1991. Seed dispersal and seedling establishment of Linaria vulgaris Mill. Can J Plant Sci. 71: 771–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PisciottaS, RaspiA, SajevaM. 2011. First records of pollinators of two co-occurring Mediterranean Apocynaceae. Plant Biosyst. 145: 141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichardsJ A. 1997. Plant breeding systems. Cambridge: Champman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• RoutleyM B, MavraganisK, EckertC G. 1999. Effect of population size on the mating system in a self-compatible, autogamous plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Heredity. 82: 518–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-ZapataT R, ArroyoM TK. 1978. Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduos tropical forest in Venezuela. Biotropica. 10: 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SáezL, BernalM. 2009. Linaria Mill. Flora Iberica.13. CastroviejoS, HerreroA, BenedíC, RicoE, GüemesJ. Madrid: CSIC. 232–324.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-GómezP, CarriónMÁ, HernándezA, GuerraL. 2003. Libro rojo de la flora silvestre protegida de la Region de Murcia. Murcia: Consejeria de Agricultura, Agua y Medio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-LafuenteA M. 2007. Corolla herbivory, pollination success and fruit predation in complex flowers: an experimental study with Linaria lilacina (Scrophulariaceae). Ann Bot. 99: 355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchemskeD W, LandeR. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution. 39: 41–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeedL, VaughtonG, RamseyM. 2006. Delayed autonomous selfing and inbreeding depression in the Australian annual Hibiscus trionum var. vesicarius (Malvaceae). Aust J Bot. 54: 27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segarra-MoraguesJ G, Mateu-AndresI. 2007. Levels of allozyme diversity in closely related toadflaxes (Linaria, Plantaginaceae) and their correspondence with the breeding systems of the species. Conserv Genet. 8: 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman-BroylesS, NasrallahJ B. 2008. Self-incompatibility and evolution of mating systems in the Brassicaceae. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Franklin-Tong. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 123–147.
   Google Scholar
• SilvaN F, GoringD R. 2001. Mechanisms of self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 58: 1988–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffan-DewenterI, TscharntkeT. 1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia. 121: 432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiehl-AlvesE M, Martins-CorderM P. 2007. Acacia mearnsii (Fabaceae) reproductive biology: pollen tube viability and growth. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 7: 29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuttonD A. 1988. A revision of the tribe Antirrhineae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ThompsonJ N, PellmyrO. 1992. Mutualism in pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: Constraints on specialization. Ecology. 73: 1780–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValdésB. 1970. Taxonomia experimental del genero Linaria. IV. Reproduccion sexual: Autogamia y polinizacion intraespecifica. Boletín de la Real Sociedad de Historia Natural (Seccion Biológica). 68: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• ValdésB, Díaz LifanteD. 1996. Habitual autogamy in Linaria tursica Valdés et Cabezudo (Scrophulariaceae). Flora. 191: 329–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VianoJ. 1978. Croisements experimentaux interspecifiques au sein du genre Linaria. Caryologia. 31: 383–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WesterberghA. 2004. An interaction between a specialized seed predator moth and its dioecious host plant shifting from parasitism to mutualism. Oikos. 105: 564–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilsonC, VoroninV, TouraevA, VicenteO, Heberle-BorsE. 1997. A developmentally regulated MAP kinase activated by hydratacion in tobacco pollen. Plant Cell. 9: 2093–2100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XueY B, CarpenterR, DickinsonH G, CoenE S. 1996. Origin of allelic diversity in Antirrhinum S locus RNases. Plant Cell. 8: 805–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZamoraR. 2002. Environmental heterogeneity and the ecology of carnivorous plants: implications for conservation. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 75: 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar