Genetic diversity in ecotypes of the scarce wild medicinal crop Zingiber moran revealed by ISSR and AFLP marker analysis and chromosome number assessment

References

• AndersonJA, ChurchillGA, AutriqueJE, TanksleySD, SorrellsME. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome36: 181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenZY. 1992. Cytology of Zingiberaceae. In: SirirugsaP, editor. A training report on cytotaxonomy of Zingiberaceae and some selected plants. Hat Yai: Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla University. pp. 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• DarlingtonCD, LacourLF. 1979. The handling of chromosome. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• DasA, KesariV, SatyanarayanaVM, ParidaA, RanganL. 2011. Genetic relationship of Curcuma species from North East India using PCR based markers. Mol Biotechnol49: 65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasAB, RaiS, DasP.1998. Estimation of 4C DNA and karyotype analysis in ginger (Zingiber officanalis Rosc.) II. Cytologia63: 133–139.
   Google Scholar
• DiceLR. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology26: 297–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HangelbroekHH, OuborgNJ, SantamariaL, SchwenkS. 2002. Clonal diversity and structure within a population of the pondweed Potamogeton pectinatus foraged by Bewick's swans. Mol Ecol11: 2137–2150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarandiOF, GhaffariM. 2001. Chromosome studies on pistacio (Pistacia vera L.) from Iran. Opt Mediterr56: 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• HussainMA, VermaV, AbdinMZ. 2008. Molecular analysis of dicot–monocot split and relationship among major angiosperm groups. Afr J Plant Sci2: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• JatoiSA, KikuchiA, MimuraM, YiSS, WatanbeKN. 2008. Relationship of ginger (Zingiber officinale) accessions from ex situ gene bank, on farm and rural markets. Breeding Sci58: 261–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KalitaS. 2005. Zingiberaceae of Assam: their taxonomy and utilization. [Thesis]Guwahati (Assam): Gauhati University.
   Google Scholar
• KavithaPG, KiranAG, Dinesh RajR, SabuM, ThomasG. 2010. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses unravel a striking difference in the intraspecific genetic diversity of four species of genus Zingiber Boehm. from the Western Ghats, South India. Curr Sci98: 242–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KesariV, DasA, RanganL. 2009. Physico-chemical characterization and microbial assay from seed oil of Pongamia pinnata, potential biofuel crop. Biomass Bioenerg33: 1724–1728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LimSN. 1972. Cytogenetics and taxonomy of the genus Globba L. (Zingiberaceae) in Malaya. II. Cytogenetics. Notes Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh31: 271–284.
   Google Scholar
• MahantyHK. 1970. A cytological study of the Zingiberales with special reference to their taxonomy. Cytologia35: 13–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MantelN. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approaches. Cancer Res27: 209–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartinB, ChristianL, AlexW. 2006. A genetic linkage map of Silene vulgaris based on AFLP markers. Genome49: 320–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NairRR, SasikumarB. 2009. Chromosome number variation among germplasm collections and seedling progenies in Turmeric, Curcuma longa L.Cytologia74: 153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NayakS, NayakPK, AcharyaL. 2005. Assessment of genetic diversity among 16 promising cultivars of zinger using cytological and molecular markers. Z Naturforsch C60: 485–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeiM. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics89: 583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaimondoFM, ScialabbaA, ZeccaG, GrassiF, CasazzaG, MinutoL. 2012. Genetic diversity in the endangered Sicilian endemic Brassica rupestris: Proposal for a conservation strategy. Plant Biosyst146: 847–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamachandranK. 1969. Chromosome numbers in Zingiberaceae. Cytologia34: 213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RanganL, DasA, KesariV, AgarwalS, SarmaGC. 2008. Use of DNA barcodes to identify Curcuma species of Northeast India, International Conference of Emerging Technologies and Applications in Engineering, Technology and Sciences Held at Saurashtra University; 13–14 January 2008, Rajkot, Gujarat, p. 2116–2120.
   Google Scholar
• RohlfFJ. 2002. NTSYSPC. Numerical taxonomy system. New York: Exter Software.
   Google Scholar
• SaowaluckB, PaisooksantivatanaY. 2010. Study of clonally propagated cassumunar ginger (Zingiber montanum (Koenig) Link ex Dietr.) and its relation of wild Zingiber species from Thailand revealed by RAPD markers. Genet Res Crop Evol57: 405–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharmaAK, BhattacharyaNK. 1959. Cytology of several members of Zingiberaceae. La Cellule59: 297–346.
   Google Scholar
• SmithJSC, ChinECL, ShuH, SmithOS, WallSJ, SeniorML, et al. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet95: 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SyamkumarS, SasikumarB. 2007. Molecular marker based genetic diversity analysis of Curcuma species from India. Scientia Hort112: 235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UrdampilletaJD, FerrucciMS, VanzelaALL. 2012. Cytogenetic studies in South American species of Serjania (Saapindaceae: Paullinieae). Plant Biosyst146: 835–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YehFC, YangRC, BoyleTBJ, YeZH, MaoJX. 1997. POPGENE, the user friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Alberta: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar