Stigma morphology in Aylostera subg. Mediolobivia (Cactaceae) and its importance for systematic investigation

REFERENCES

• AkhaniH, ChatrenoorT, DehghaniM, KhoshraveshaR, MahdaviaP, MatinzadehaZ. 2011. A new species of Bienertia (Chenopodiaceae) from Iranian salt deserts: A third species of the genus and discovery of a fourth terrestrial C4 plant without Kranz. Plant Biosyst146: 550–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BanchevaS, GeraciA, RaimondoFM. 2011. Assessing the genetic diversity of Centaurea parlatoris group (sect Dissectae, Compositae) in Sicily using isozymes. Plant Biosyst145: 778–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BigazziM, SelviF. 2000. Stigma form and surface in the tribe Boragineae (Boraginaceae): Micromorphological diversity, relationships with pollen, and systematic relevance. Can J Bot78: 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• BrownGK, GilmartinAJ. 1984. Stigma structure and variation in Bromeliaceae – Neglected taxonomic characters. Brittonia36: 364–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DanilatosGD. 1981. The examination of fresh or living plant material in an environmental scanning electron microscope. J Microscopy121: 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• EndoY, OhashiH. 1995. The morphology of styles and stigmas in Vicia (Leguminosae) and its systematics implications. J Plant Res108: 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeazlewoodJE, WilsonS. 2004. Anthesis, pollination and fruit set in Pinot Noir. Vitis43: 65–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heslop-HarrisonJ, Heslop-HarrisonY. 1982. The specialized cuticles of the receptive surface of angiosperm stigmas. Linnean Soc Symp Ser10: 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Heslop-HarrisonY. 1981. Stigma characteristics and angiosperm taxonomy. Nord J Bot1: 401–420.
   Google Scholar
• Heslop-HarrisonY. 1990. Stigma form and surface in relation to self-incompatibility in the Onagraceae. Nord J Bot10: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MihalteL, SestraRE, FesztG, TamasE. 2011. Assessment of genetic variation on four genera of Cactaceae using taxonomic, cytological and molecular markers methods. Plant Omics4(3): 142–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MostiS. 1999. Digitorebutia Buining & Donald, an interesting section of the vast genus Rebutia. Cactus & Co3: 187–209.
   Google Scholar
• MostiS. 2000a. Digitorebutia Buining & Donald, an interesting section of the vast genus Rebutia. Cactus & Co4: 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• MostiS. 2000b. Digitorebutia Buining & Donald, an interesting section of the vast genus Rebutia. Cactus & Co4: 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• MostiS, BandaraNL, PapiniA. 2011. Further insights and new combinations in Aylostera (Cactaceae) based on molecular and morphological data. Pak J Bot43: 2769–2785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MostiS, FioriniG, PapiniA. 2011. Karyological investigations on several species of genus Rebutia sect. Digitorebutia (Cactaceae). Caryologia64: 302–308.
   Google Scholar
• MostiS, PapiniA. 2005. Rebutia. Three new species. Two new species for the section Digitorebutia (Buin.) Buin. & Don. and one new species for the section Setirebutia Buin. & Don. (genus Rebutia K. Schum.) from Argentina. Cactus & Co9: 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• MostiS, PapiniA, AndalòC, BrighignaL. 2001. Ultrastructural aspects of the hypanthial epithelium of Selenicereus grandiflorus (L.) Britton & Rose (Cactaceae). Flora196: 194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MostiS, RaffaelliM. 2003. Utilità tassonomica di alcuni caratteri micromorfologici del seme nella sezione Digitorebutia (Buin.) Buin. & Don. del genere Rebutia Schumann (Cactaceae). Inform Bot Ital35: 138–140.
   Google Scholar
• OwensSJ, KimminsFM. 1981. Stigma morphology in Commelinaceae.Ann Bot (Oxford), Ser. 247: 771–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PapiniA, SimeoneMC, BellarosaR, SpadaF, SchironeB. 2011. Quercusmacranthera Fisch. & Mey. ex Hohen. and Quercus iberica M. Bieb.: Taxonomic definition and systematic relationships with European oaks inferred from nuclear ITS data. Plant Biosyst145: 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeruzziL. 2011. A new species of Linum perenne group (Linaceae) from Calabria (S Italy). Plant Biosyst145: 938–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PilbeamJ. 1997. Rebutia. In: PilbeamJ, editor. The cactus file handbook, Vol. 2. Southampton: Cirio. pp. 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• PisciottaS, RaspiA, SajevaM. 2011. First records of pollinators of two co-occurring Mediterranean Apocynaceae. Plant Biosyst145(1): 141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RauschW. 1986. Lobivia 85. Wien: Rudolf Herzig.
   Google Scholar
• RowleyG. 2009. Rebutia reappraised. Cactus World27: 88–90.
   Google Scholar
• ShiranB, MashayekhiS, JahanbazziH, SoltaniA, BruschiP. 2011. Morphological and molecular diversity among populations of Quercus brantii Lindl. In western forest of Iran. Plant Biosyst145(2): 452–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimeoneMC, PapiniA, VessellaF, BellarosaR, SpadaF, SchironeB. 2009. Multiple genome relationships and a complex biogeographic history in the eastern range of Quercus suber L. (Fagaceae) implied by nuclear and chloroplast DNA variation. Caryologia62: 236–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmallE, BrookesBS. 1983. The systematic value of stigma morphology in the legume tribe Trifolieae with particular relevance to Medicago. Can J Bot61: 2388–2404.
   Google Scholar
• StabentheinerE, ZankelA, PöltP. 2010. Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) – A versatile tool in studying plants. Protoplasma246: 89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwoffordDL, OlsenGJ, WaddellPJ, HillisDM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: HillisDM, MoritzC, MableBK, editors. Molecular systematics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. pp. 407–514.
   Google Scholar
• TheileHL, CliffordHT, RogersRW. 1996. Diversity in the grass pistil and its taxonomic significance. Aust Syst Bot9: 903–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ViscosiV, FortiniP, SliceDE, LoyA, BlasiC. 2009. Geometric morphometric analyses of leaf variation in four oak species of subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst143(3): 575–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar