The vascular flora of Rome

REFERENCES

• AbbateG, BonacquistiS, ScassellatiE. 2001. Il genere Rubus L. sez. Rubus (Rosaceae) in Italia centrale: Stato attuale delle conoscenze. Inform Bot Ital33: 481–487.
   Google Scholar
• AbbateG, BonacquistiS, ScassellatiE. 2002. Morphological study of three taxa of genus Rubus L. (Rosaceae), sect. Rubus, in western-central Italy. Plant Biosyst136: 321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AcostaA, StanisciA, ErcoleS, BlasiC. 2003. Sandy coastal landscape of the Lazio region (central Italy). Phytocoenologia33: 715–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB. 1951. Flora e vegetazione dei muri di Roma. Ann Bot23: 393–497.
   Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB. 1952. Residui di vegetazione spontanea in Roma. 1° – I Monti Parioli. Nuovo Giorn Bot Ital59: 368–377.
   Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB. 1953. Residui di vegetazione spontanea in Roma. 2° – Monte Mario e i Monti della Farnesina. Ann Bot24: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB. 1978. Osservazioni sulla flora e vegetazione riparia lungo il fiume Tevere entro Roma. Lav Soc Ital Biogeog n.s.4: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB. 1986. La Flora vascolare spontanea delle rive del Tevere e suoi affluenti entro Roma. Ann Bot Suppl Studi sul territorio44: 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB, IberiteM, LattanziE. 2010. La Flora vascolare del Lazio. Inform Bot Ital42: 187–317.
   Google Scholar
• AnzaloneB, LattanziE, LuccheseF. 1990. La flora della Tenuta di Castelporziano (Roma). Quad Accad Naz Lincei264: 133–218.
   Google Scholar
• ArdizzoneG, BelluscioA, MaioranoL. 2006. Long-term change in the structure of a Posidonia oceanica landscape and its reference for a monitoring plan. PSZNI Mar Ecol27: 299–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AzzellaMM, IberiteM, FascettiS, RosatiL. 2013. Loss detection of aquatic habitats in Italian volcanic lakes using historical data. Plant Biosyst147: 521–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BacchettaG, FarrisE, PontecorvoC. 2012. A new method to set conservation priorities in biodiversity hotspots. Plant Biosyst146: 638–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerHG. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst5: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• BanfiE, GalassoG. 1998. La flora spontanea della città di Milano alle soglie del terzo millennio e i suoi cambiamenti a partire dal 1700. Mem Soc Ital Sci Nat Mus Civ Stor Nat Milano27: 267–387.
   Google Scholar
• BartolucciF, De LorenzisA, CecereJG, editors. 2004. La flora vascolare. Quaderni dell'Oasi Castel di Guido. Vol. 1 LIPU.
   Google Scholar
• BeguinotA. 1899. La flora dei depositi alluvionali del Tevere entro Roma. Nota preventiva. Boll Soc Bot Ital : 222–229.
   Google Scholar
• BiancoPM, FanelliG, De LillisM. 2002. Flora and vegetation of Castel Fusano (Rome). Quad Bot Amb Appl13: 125–181.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Capotorti G. 2005. Carta delle serie di vegetazione del territorio del Comune di Roma (1:50.000). Available: http://www.urbanistica.comune.roma.it. Accessed July 2013 20.
   Google Scholar
• BlasiC, CapotortiG, FrondoniR. 2005. Defining and mapping typological models at the landscape scale. Plant Biosyst139: 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlasiC, CapotortiG, MarcheseM, MartaM, BolognaMA, BombiP, et al. 2008a. Interdisciplinary research for the proposal of the urban biosphere reserve of Rome municipality. Plant Biosyst142: 305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlasiC, CapotortiG, MartaM, MarcheseM. 2008b. An integrated approach to better define the concept and functions of Urban Biosphere Reserves. Plant Biosyst142: 324–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlasiC, DowgialloG, FollieriM, LuccheseF, MagriD, PignattiS, et al. 1995. La vegetazione naturale potenziale dell'area romana. Quad Accad Naz Lincei115: 423–457.
   Google Scholar
• BlasiC, FrondoniR. 2011. Modern perspectives for plant sociology: The case of eco-logical land classification and the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosyst145: 30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Lattanzi E, Tilia A, Celesti-Grapow L, Fortini P, Capotorti G. 2004. Carta delle emergenze floristico-vegetazionali del territorio del Comune di Roma (1:20,000). Available: http://www.urbanistica.comune.roma.it. Accessed Jul 2013 20.
   Google Scholar
• BlasiC, MichettiL. 2001. Carta del fitoclima dell'Area Romana. CD rom in Inform Bot Ital33(suppl. 1)
   Google Scholar
• BlasiC, ZavatteroL, MarignaniM, SmiragliaD, CopizR, RosatiL, et al. 2008c. The concept of land ecological network and its design using a land unit approach. Plant Biosyst142: 540–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlondelJ, AronsonJ. 1995. Biodiversity and ecosystem function in the Mediterranean Basin: Human and non-human determinants. In: DavisGW, RichardsonDM, editors. Mediterranean-type ecosystems: The function of biodiversity. Ecological studies 109.Berlin: Springer. pp. 43–119.
   Google Scholar
• BrunduG, AzzellaMM, BlasiC, CamardaI, IberiteM, Celesti-GrapowL. 2013. The silent invasion of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. in Italy. Plant Biosyst147. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.861536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CacciatoA. 1952. La vegetazione antropocora dello scalo ferroviario ostiense di Roma. Nuovo Giorn Bot Ital59: 119–143.
   Google Scholar
• CadotteMW, MurrayBR, Lovett-DoustJ. 2006. Ecological patterns and biological invasions: Using regional species inventories in macroecology. Biol Invasions8: 809–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanevaG, PaciniA, Celesti-GrapowL, CeschinS. 2003. The Colosseum's use and state of abandonment analysed through its flora. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad51: 211–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CapotortiG, Del VicoE, LattanziE, TiliaA, Celesti-GrapowL. 2013. Exploring biodiversity in a metropolitan area in the Mediterranean region: The urban and suburban flora of Rome (Italy). Plant Biosyst147: 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CapotortiG, ZavatteroL, AnzellottiI, BurrascanoS, FrondoniR, MarchettiM, et al. 2012. Do National Parks play an active role in conserving the natural capital of Italy?Plant Biosyst146: 258–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL. 1995. Atlas of the flora of Rome [In Italian with English summary]. Rome: Comune di Roma. 222 p.
   Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, AlessandriniA, ArrigoniPV, AssiniS, BanfiE, BarniE, et al. 2010. Non-native flora of Italy: Species distribution and threats. Plant Biosyst144: 12–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, AlessandriniA, ArrigoniPV, BanfiE, BernardoL, BovioM, et al. 2009. Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. Plant Biosyst143: 386–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, BlasiC. 1998. A comparison of the urban flora of different phytoclimatic regions in Italy. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett7: 367–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, BlasiC. 2004. The role of alien and native weeds in the deterioration of archaeological remains in Italy. Weed Technol18: 1508–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, CanevaG, PaciniA. 2001a. The Flora of Colosseum (Rome) [In Italian with English summary]. Webbia56: 321–342.
   Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, Di MarzioP, BlasiC. 2001b. The importance of alien and native species in the urban flora of Rome (Italy). In: BrunduG, BrockJ, CamardaI, ChildL, WadeM, editors. Plant invasions: Species ecology and ecosystem management. Leiden: Blackhuys. pp. 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, Di MarzioP, BlasiC. 2003. Temporal niche separation of the alien flora of Rome (Italy). In: ChildL, BrockJH, BrunduG, PrachK, PyšekP, WadePM, editors., et al. Plant invasions. Leiden: Blackhuys. pp. 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, FanelliG. 1993. The vanishing landscape of the Campagna Romana. Landscape Urban Plan24: 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesti-GrapowL, PyšekP, JarošíkV, BlasiC. 2006. Determinants of native and alien species richness in the urban flora of Rome. Divers Distrib12: 490–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CeschinS, CancellieriL, SalernoG, ToscanoS, CanevaG. 2012. Contributo alla conoscenza floristica della Campagna Romana: Il Vallone di Ponte Lupo (Roma). Inform Bot Ital44: 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• CeschinS, CanevaG. 2001. Contributo alla conoscenza della Flora dell'area archeologica del Palatino (Roma). Inform Bot Ital33: 391–406.
   Google Scholar
• CeschinS, SalernoG, BisceglieS, KumbaricA. 2010. Temporal floristic variations as indicator of environmental changes in the Tiber River in Rome. Aqua Ecol44: 93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChronopoulosG, ChristodoulakisD. 1996. Contribution to the urban ecology of Greece: The flora of the city of Patras and the surrounding area. Bot Helv106: 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChronopoulosG, ChristodoulakisD. 2006. Contribution to the urban ecology of Greece: The flora of the city of Alexandroupolis (NE Greece) and its vicinity. Fresenius Environ Bull15: 1455–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ContiF, AbbateG, AlessandriniA, BlasiC, editors. 2005. An annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora. Rome: Palombi. p. 420.
   Google Scholar
• ContiF, ManziA, PedrottiF. 1997. Liste Rosse Regionali delle Piante d'Italia. Camerino: WWF and Societá Botanica Italiana. p.139.
   Google Scholar
• CorneliniP, PetrellaP. 1994. La flora della stazione di Roma Ostiense: Variazioni e confronti con il censimento di Cacciato (1952). Ann Bot Suppl Studi sul territorio52: 457–478.
   Google Scholar
• CroceA, NazzaroR, La ValvaV. 2012. Evidence of dramatic biodiversity loss in a wet biotope calls for urgent conservation strategies. Plant Biosyst146: 827–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DanaED. 2002. Flora y vegetación urbanícolas de la ciudad de Almería: Características taxómicas, biogeográficas, fitocenológicas y ecológicas de las especies vegetales no ornamentales de la ciudad. Almería: Instituto de Estudios Almerienses.
   Google Scholar
• De NataleA, La ValvaV. 2000. The Urban Flora of Naples [In Italian with English summary]. Webbia54: 271–375.
   Google Scholar
• DearbornDC, KarkS. 2009. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol24: 432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnen-SchmutzK. 2004. Alien species reflecting history: Medieval castles in Germany. Divers Distrib10: 147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnen-SchmutzK, TouzaJ, PerringsC, WilliamsonM. 2007. The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conserv Biol.21: 224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DolanRW, MooreME, StephensJD. 2011. Documenting effects of urbanization on flora using herbarium records. J Ecol99: 1055–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FanelliG. 2002. Analisi fitosociologica dell'area metropolitana di Roma. Braun-Blanquetia27: 1–269.
   Google Scholar
• FanelliG, De SanctisM, Serafini SauliA. 2012. The rediscovery of Trifolium latinum (Fabaceae) in Rome one century after its apparent disappearance from Italy. [In Italian with English summary]. Inform Bot Ital44: 337–339.
   Google Scholar
• FrondoniR, MolloB, CapotortiG. 2011. A landscape analysis of land cover change in the Municipality of Rome (Italy): Spatio-temporal characteristics and ecological implications of land cover transitions from 1954 to 2001. Landscape Urban Plan100: 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FuentesN, PauchardA, SánchezP, EsquivelJ, MarticorenaA. 2013. A new comprehensive database of alien plant species in Chile based on herbarium records. Biol Invasions15: 847–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes-BazanS, UotilaP, BorschT. 2012. A novel phylogeny-based generic classification for Chenopodium sensu lato, and a tribal rearrangement of Chenopodioideae (Chenopodiaceae). Willdenowia42: 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FunicielloR, GiordanoG, editors. 2008. Note illustrative della carta geologica d'Italia alla scala 1:50.000, foglio 374.Roma.
   Google Scholar
• GiulianiC, Maleci BiniL. 2012. Glandular trichomes as further differential characters between Stachys subgenus Betonica (L.) Bhattacharjee and Stachys subgenus Stachys. Plant Biosyst146: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoddardMA, DougillAJ, BentonTG. 2009. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol25: 90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HahsAK, McDonnellMJ, McCarthyMA, VeskPA, CorlettRT, NortonBA, et al. 2009. A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol Lett12: 1165–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IamonicoD. 2008. Sulla presenza di alcune entità del genere Amaranthus L. (Amaranthaceae) nel Lazio. Inform Bot Ital40: 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• IamonicoD. 2009. First record of Amaranthuspowellii subsp. powellii (Amaranthaceae) in Lazio region (central Italy) with taxonomical, morphological, corologycal and ecological notes. Acta Bot Malacit34: 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• IamonicoD. 2012. Amaranthuspowellii S. Watson subsp. cacciatoi comb. & stat. nov. (Amaranthaceae). Nord J Bot30: 12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IamonicoD, LorenzettiR. 2008. La Flora vascolare della Riserva Naturale di Monte Mario (Roma): Studio di base ed analisi comparativa con la flora di altre aree verdi di Roma. Riv Piemont Stor Nat29: 141–168.
   Google Scholar
• JarošíkV, KonvičkaM, PyšekP, KadlecT, BenešJ. 2011. Conservation in a city: Do the same principles apply to different taxa?Biol Conserv144: 490–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KowarikI. 2003. Human agency in biological invasions: Secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biol Invasions5: 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• KowarikI. 2005. Urban ornamentals escaped from cultivation. In: GresselJ, editor. Crop ferality and volunteerism. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• KowarikI. 2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut159: 1974–1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KowarikI, von der LippeM, CierjacksA. 2013. Prevalence of alien versus native species of woody plants in Berlin differs between habitats and at different scales. Preslia85: 113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrigasN, KokkiniS. 2004. A survey of the alien vascular flora of the urban and suburban area of Thessaloniki, N Greece. Willdenowia34: 81–99.
   Google Scholar
• KühnI, BrandlR, KlotzS. 2004. The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res6: 749–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KühnI, KlotzS. 2006. Urbanization and homogeneization – comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany. Biol Conserv127: 292–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La SorteF, McKinneyML, PyšekP, KlotzS, RapsonGL, Celesti-GrapowL, et al. 2008. Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: The impact of anthropogenic activities on β diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr17: 363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambdonPW, PyšekP, BasnouC, DelipetrouP, EsslF, HejdaM, et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: Species diversity, temporal trends, geographical pattern and research needs. Preslia80: 101–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LattanziE, ScoppolaA, TiliaA. 2003. Apport à la connaissance des espèces du genre Rosa L. dans le Latium (Italie centrale). Bocconea16: 723–730.
   Google Scholar
• LattanziE, TiliaA. 2002. Il genere Rosa L. nel Lazio: Studio preliminare. Inform Bot Ital33: 524–528.
   Google Scholar
• LattanziE, TiliaA. 2004a. Area archeologica di Ostia Antica: Analisi floristica preliminare e relativa valutazione della pericolosità. 40° Congresso della Società Italiana di Fitosociologia, February 19–21 2004, Roma. Roma: Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre”, p 19.
   Google Scholar
• LattanziE, TiliaA. 2004b. Tre entità del genere Rosa L. nuove per il Lazio. Inform Bot Ital36: 165–167.
   Google Scholar
• LattanziE, TiliaA, BlasiC. 2005. Il contributo dell'indagine floristica nelle analisi territoriali. Inform Bot Ital37: 340–341.
   Google Scholar
• LososováZ, ChytrýM, KühnI, HájekO, HorákováV, PyšekP, et al. 2006. Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe. Perspect Plant Ecol8: 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LososováZ, ChytrýM, TichýL, DanihelkaJ, FajmonK, HájekO, et al. 2012a. Biotic homogenization of Central European urban floras depends on residence time of alien species and habitat types. Biol Conserv145: 179–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LososováZ, ChytrýM, TichýL, DanihelkaJ, FajmonK, HájekO, et al. 2012b. Native and alien floras in urban habitats: A comparison across 32 cities of central Europe. Global Ecol Biogeogr21: 545–555.
   Google Scholar
• MartiniF. 2006. La flora vascolare spontanea della città di Trieste (Italia nordorientale). Webbia61: 57–94.
   Google Scholar
• McKinneyML. 2001. Effects of human population, area, and time on non-native plant and fish diversity in the United States. Biol Conserv100: 243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinneyML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience52: 883–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinneyML. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv127: 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontelucciG. 1953–54. Investigazioni botaniche nel Lazio; V – Flora e vegetazione della valle dell'Inferno a Roma (Monte Mario). Ann Bot24: 1–167.
   Google Scholar
• MuratetA, MachonN, JiguetF, MoretJ, PorcherE. 2007. The role of urban structures in the distribution of wasteland flora in the greater Paris area, France. Ecosystems10: 661–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyersN, MittermeierRA, MittermeierCG, da FonsecaGAB, KentJ. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature403: 853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PalmerGC, FitzsimonsJA, AntosMJ, WhiteJG. 2008. Determinants of native avian richness in suburban remnant vegetation: Implications for conservation planning. Biol Conserv141: 2329–2341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanaroliD. 1643. Jatrologismi Sive Medicae Observationes Quibus Additus est in Fine Plantarum Amphitheatralium Catalogus. Rome: Typis Dominici Marciani. p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• PapiniA, SimeoneMC, BellarosaR, SpadaF, SchironeB. 2011. Quercus macranthera Fisch. & Mey. ex Hohen. and Quercus iberica M. Bieb.: Taxonomic definition and systematic relationships with European oaks inferred from nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) data. Plant Biosyst145: 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PignattiS. 1982. Flora d'Italia. Bologna: Edagricole.
   Google Scholar
• PoldiniL, VitaliM, GanisP. 2011. Riparian Salix alba: Scrubs of the Po lowland (N-Italy) from an European perspective. Plant Biosyst145: 132–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrestonCD, PearmanDA, HallAR. 2004. Archaeophytes in Britain. Bot J Linn Soc145: 257–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrestonCD, SheailJ, ArmitagePD, Davy-BowkerJ. 2003. The long-term impact of urbanisation on aquatic plants: Cambridge and the River Cam. Sci Total Environ314–316: 67–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrettoF, Celesti-GrapowL, CarliE, BlasiC. 2010. Influence of past land use and current human disturbance on non-native plant species on small Italian islands. Plant Ecol210: 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrettoF, Celesti-GrapowL, CarliE, BrunduG, BlasiC. 2012. Determinants of non-native plant species richness and composition across small Mediterranean islands. Biol Invasions14: 2559–2572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PyšekP. 1998. Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: A quantitative comparison. J Biogeogr25: 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PyšekP, BacherS, ChytrýM, JarošíkV, WildJ, Celesti-GrapowL, et al. 2010. Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Global Ecol Biogeogr19: 317–331.
   Google Scholar
• PyšekP, RichardsonDM, RejmánekM, WebsterGL, WilliamsonM, KirschnerJ. 2004. Alien plants in checklist and floras: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon53: 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichardsonDM, PyšekP. 2012. Naturalization of introduced plants: Ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytol196: 383–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RicottaC, Celesti-GrapowL, AvenaGC, BlasiC. 2001. Topological analysis of the spatial distribution of plant species richness across the city of Rome (Italy) with the echelon approach. Landscape Urban Plan57: 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RicottaC, Di NepiM, GugliettaD, Celesti-GrapowL. 2008a. Exploring taxonomic filtering in urban environments. J Veg Sci19: 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RicottaC, GodefroidS, Celesti-GrapowL. 2008b. Common species have lower taxonomic diversity. Evidence from the urban floras of Brussels and Rome. Divers Distrib14: 530–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RicottaC, La SorteFA, PyšekP, RapsonGL, Celesti-GrapowL, ThompsonK. 2009. Phyloecology of urban alien floras. J Ecol97: 1243–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RicottaC, La SorteFA, PyšekP, RapsonGL, Celesti-GrapowL, ThompsonK. 2012. Phylogenetic beta diversity of native and alien species in European urban floras. Global Ecol Biogeogr21: 751–759.
   Google Scholar
• RossiW. 1989. Native orchids in the main archeological sites of Rome. Braun-Blanquetia3: 269–270.
   Google Scholar
• SaccardoPA. 1909. Cronologia della flora Italiana. Padova: Tipografia del Seminario.
   Google Scholar
• SalernoG, CeschinS, CutiniM. 2007. Contributo alla conoscenza floristica della Campagna Romana: L'area archeologica di Gabi-Castiglione (Roma). Inform Bot Ital39: 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• ScoppolaA, LattanziE. 2012. Viola section Melanium (Violaceae) in Italy. New data on morphology of Viola tricolor-Group. Webbia67: 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• ScoppolaA, MagriniS, CelestiniM. 2011. Lupinus sect. Albus (Fabaceae): Taxonomic criticism and conservation value. The case of wild populations in central Italy. Plant Biosyst145: 514–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the CBD. 2012. Cities and biodiversity outlook. A global assessment of the links between action and policy: Urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, Montreal, 64 pp.
   Google Scholar
• SelviF, GreuterW. 2012. Proposal to conserve the name Myosotis sicula against M. gussonei (Boraginaceae). Taxon61: 467–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShaminéeJHJ, JanssenJAM, HennekensSM, OzingaWA. 2011. Large vegetation databases and information systems: New instruments for ecological research, nature conservation, and policy making. Plant Biosyst145: 85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SharrockS. 2011. GSPC, Global strategy for plant conservation. A guide to the GSPC. All the targets, objectives and facts. Richmond: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• SiniscalcoC, BarniE, BacaroG. 2011. Non-native species distribution along the elevation gradient in the western Italian Alps. Plant Biosyst145: 150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiniscalcoC, MontacchiniF. 1994. Prodromo della flora urbica torinese. Allionia32: 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• SukoppH. 2002. On the early history of urban ecology in Europe. Preslia74: 373–393.
   Google Scholar
• SukoppH. 2004. Human-caused impact on preserved vegetation. Landscape Urban Plan68: 347–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SukoppH. 2006. Apophytes in the flora of Central Europe. Pol Bot Stud22: 473–485.
   Google Scholar
• ThompsonK, AustinKC, SmithRM, WarrenPH, AngoldPG, GastonK. 2003. Urban domestic gardens (I): Putting small-scale plant diversity in contex. J Veg Sci14: 71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TroíaA, AzzellaMM. 2013. Isoëtes sabatina (Isoëtaceae, Lycopodiophyta), a new aquatic species from Central Italy. Plant Biosyst. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/11263504.2013.782902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TutinTG, BurgesNA, ChaterAO, EdmondsonJR, HeywoodWH, MooreDM, et al. 1993. Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. 2nd ed., Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TutinTG, HeywoodVH, BurgesNA, ValentineDH, WaltersSM, WebbDA. 1964–1980. Flora Europaea. 5 vols. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ViscosiV, FortiniP, SliceDE, LoyA, BlasiC. 2009. Geometric morphometric analyses of leaf variation in four oak species of the subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst143: 575–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaniaA, KühnI, KlotzS. 2006. Plant richness patterns in agricultural and urban landscapes in Central Germany – spatial gradients of species richness. Landscape Urban Plan75: 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WernerP. 2011. The ecology of urban areas and their functions for species diversity. Landscape Ecol Eng7: 231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WittigR. 2004. The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban Ecosyst7: 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• ZerbeS, MaurerU, SchmitzS, SukoppH. 2003. Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landscape Urban Plan62: 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZidornC. 2012. Leontodon and Scorzoneroides (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) in Italy. Plant Biosyst146: 41–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar