Evaluating effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal consortia and Azotobacter chroococcum in improving biomass yield of Jatropha curcas

References

• AdesemoyeAO, TorbertHA, KloepperJW. 2009. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol58(4): 921–929. 10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-KarakiGN.2006. Nursery inoculation of tomato with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and subsequent performance under irrigation with saline water. Sci Horticult109(1): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AseriGK, JainN, PanwarJ, RaoAV, MeghwalPR. 2008. Biofertilizers improve plant growth, fruit yield, nutrition, metabolism and rhizosphere enzyme activities of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) In indian thar desert. Sci Hortic117(2): 130–135. 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakulinMK, GrudtsynaAS, PletnevaAY. 2007. Biological fixation of nitrogen and growth of bacteria of the genus Azotobacter in liquid media in the presence of perfluorocarbons. Appl Biochem Microbiol43(4): 399–402. 10.1134/S0003683807040072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, Marion M.1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem72(1): 248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CastilloCG, PuccioF, MoralesD, BorieF, SieverdingE. 2012. Early arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization of wheat, barley and oats in Andosols of southern Chile. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr12(3): 511–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChaturvediS, KumarA. 2012. Bio-diesel waste as tailored organic fertilizer for improving yields and nutritive values of Lycopercicum esculatum (tomato) crop. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 12(4): 801–810. 10.4067/S0718-95162012005000033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChaturvediS, KumarA, SinghB, NainL, JoshiM, SatyaS. 2013. Bioaugmented composting of jatropha de-oiled cake and vegetable waste under aerobic and partial anaerobic conditions. J Basic Microbiol53(4): 327–335. 10.1002/jobm.201100634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuncanDB. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics11(1): 1–42. 10.2307/3001478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-QuesniFEM, HashishKhI, KandilMM, Mazher AzzaAM. 2013. Impact of some biofertilizers and compost on growth and chemical composition of Jatropha curcas L. World Appl Sci J21(6): 927–932.
   Google Scholar
• GhoshPK, Ajay BandyopadhyayKK, MannaMC, MisraAK, MandalKG, HatiKM. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. Dry matter, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresour Technol95: 83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GryndlerM, HršelováH, StríteskáD. 2000. Effect of soil bacteria on hyphal growth of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum. Folia Microbiol45(6): 545–551. 10.1007/BF02818724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuptaA, KumarA, SharmaS, VijayVK. 2013. Comparative evaluation of raw and detoxified mahua seed cake for biogas production. Appl Energy102: 1514–1521. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HanwayJJ, HeidelH. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State college soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agric57: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• IrigoyenJJ, EinerichDW, Sánchez-DíazM. 1992. Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiol Plant84(1): 55–60. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb08764.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JanS, ParweenT, Mahmooduzzafar, Siddiqi. 2009. Comparative effect of Azotobacter, Mycorrhizal inoculum and nitrogen fertilizer on biochemical, growth and productivity aspects in Vicia faba l. Am-Eurasian J Sust Agric3(4): 684–693.
   Google Scholar
• KashyapS, SharmaS, VasudevanP. 2004. Role of bioinoculants in development of salt-resistant saplings of Morus alba (var. Sujanpuri) in vivo. Sci Hort100(1-4): 291–307. 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KasimWA, OsmanME, OmarMN, Abd El-DaimIA, BejaiS, MeijerJ. 2013. Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J Plant Growth Regul32(1): 122–130. 10.1007/s00344-012-9283-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhanizadehS, HamelC, KianmehrH, BuszardD, SmithDL. 1995. Effect of three vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae species and phosphorus on reproductive and vegetative growth of three strawberry cultivars. J Plant Nutr18(6): 1073–1079. 10.1080/01904169509364963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KohlerJ, CaravacaF, CarrascoL, RoldánA. 2007. Interactions between a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, an AM fungus and a phosphate-solubilising fungus in the rhizosphere of Lactuca sativa. Appl Soil Ecol35(3): 480–487. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarA, DamesJF, GuptaA, SharmaS, GilbertJA, AhmadP. 2014. Current developments in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi research and its role in salinity stress alleviation: A biotechnological perspective. Crit Rev Biotechnol : 1–14. 10.3109/07388551.2014.899964.[Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KumarA, KumarK, KaushikN, SharmaS, MishraS. 2010a. Renewable energy in India: Current status and future Potentials. Renew Sust Energy Rev14(8): 2434–2442. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarA, SharmaS. 2008. An evaluation of multipurpose oil seed crop for industrial uses (Jatropha curcas L.): A review. Ind Crops Prod28(1): 1–10. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarA, SharmaS. 2011. Potential non-edible oil resources as biodiesel feedstock: An Indian perspective. Renew Sust Energy Rev15(4): 1791–1800. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarA, SharmaS, MishraS. 2010b. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and salinity on seedling growth, solute accumulation, and mycorrhizal dependency of Jatropha curcas L. J Plant Growth Regul29(3): 297–306. 10.1007/s00344-009-9136-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarA, SharmaS, MishraS, DamesJ. 2014. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi augmented growth and antioxidative response of Jatropha curcas (L.) under Na2SO4 salt stress. Plant Biosyst : 1–10. 10.1080/11263504.2013.845268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarGP, KishoreN, Leo Daniel AmalrajELD, Mir Hassan AhmedSMH, RasulA, DesaiS. 2012. Evaluation of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. With single and multiple PGPR traits for plant growth promotion of sorghum in combination with AM fungi. Plant Growth Regul67(2): 133–140. 10.1007/s10725-012-9670-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MirzakhaniM, ArdakaniMR, BandAA, RejaliF, RadAS.2009. Response of spring Safflower to co-inoculation with Azotobacter chroococum and Glomus intraradices under different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Am J Agric Biol Sci4(3): 255–261. 10.3844/ajabssp.2009.255.261.
   Google Scholar
• NiuG, RodriguezD, MendozaM, JifonJ, GanjegunteG. 2012. Responses of Jatropha curcas to salt and drought stresses. Int J Agron. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/632026..
   Google Scholar
• OlsenSR, ColeCV, WatanabeFS, DeanLA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circ US Dept Agric No. 939Washington, DC: USDA.
   Google Scholar
• PatraP, PatiBK, GhoshGK, MuraSS, SahaA.2013. Effect of Biofertilizers and Sulphur on Growth, Yield, and Oil Content of Hybrid Sunflower (Helianthus annuus. L) In a Typical Lateritic Soil. 2: 603. 10.4172/scientificreports.603.
   Google Scholar
• PhillipsJM, HaymanDS. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc55(1): 158–161. 10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaoGR, KorwarGR, ShankerAK, RamakrishnaYS. 2008. Genetic associations, variability and diversity in seed characters, growth, reproductive phenology and yield in Jatropha curcas (L.) accessions. Trees22(5): 697–709. 10.1007/s00468-008-0229-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadasivam, ManickemA. 1992. Biochemical methods for agricultural sciences. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern.
   Google Scholar
• SchonfeldMA, JohnsonRC, CarverBF, MornhinwegDW. 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci28(3): 526–531. 10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinghNB, KumarA, RaiS. 2014. Potential production of bioenergy from biomass in an Indian perspective. Renew Sust Energy Rev39: 65–78. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SreeramuluKR, HanumanthappaM, GowdaA, KalyanaKN, JayasheelaN. 2000. Dual inoculation of Azotobacter chrococcum and Glomus fasciculatum improves growth and yield of sunflower under field conditions and saves N and P fertilizer application. Environ Ecol18: 380–384.
   Google Scholar
• StamenovD, JarakM, DurićS, MiloševD, Hajnal-JafariT. 2012. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the production of English ryegrass. Plant Soil Environ58(10): 477–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StrainHH, SvecWA. 1966. Extraction, separation, estimation and isolation of chlorophylls. In: VernonLP, SeelyGR, editors. The chlorophylls. New York: Academic Press. pp. 21–66.
   Google Scholar
• Subba RaoNS. 1982. Biofertilizers in agriculture. New Delhi: Oxford/IBH.
   Google Scholar
• YildrimE, DonmezMF, TuranM. 2008. Use of bioinoculants in ameliorative effects on radish plants under salinity stress. J Plant Nutr31(12): 2059–2074. 10.1080/01904160802446150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZareiM, PaymanehZ. 2014. Effect of salinity and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and some physiological parameters of Citrus jambheri. Arch Agron Soil Sci60(7): 993–1004. 10.1080/03650340.2013.853289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar