A federated database of taxon pages in the Italian Biodiversity Network

References

• Berendsohn WG, Chavan V, Macklin JA. 2010. Recommendations of the GBIF task group on the global strategy and action plan for the mobilisation of natural history collections data. J Biodiv Inform 7: 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni I, De Mattia F, Martellos S, Galimberti A, Savadori P, Casiraghi M, et al. 2012. DNA barcoding as an effective tool in improving a digital plant identification system: A case study for the area of Mt. Valerio, Trieste (NE Italy). PLoS ONE 7(9): e43256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C. 2005. An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. Rome: Palombi Editore. 428 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fegraus EH, Andelman S, Jones MB, Schildhauer M. 2005. Maximizing the value of ecological data with structured metadata: An introduction to ecological metadata language (EML) and principles for metadata creation. Bull Ecol Soc Am 86(3): 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt E, Garrity GM, et al. 2011. The genomic standards consortium. PLoS Biol 9: 6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GBIF. 2010. Best practices in publishing species checklists. Contributors: Remsen D, Döring M, Robertson T, Ko B. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility. 10 pp. Available: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2869. Accessed July 25 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Güntsch A, Mergen P, Berendsohn WG. 2007. The BioCASE project: A biological collections access service for Europe. Ferrantia 51: 103–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn G. 2000. TDWG working group: Structure of descriptive data. Minutes of SDD session at the TDWG meeting in Frankfurt, 12 November 2000. Available: http://160.45.63.11/Projects/TDWG-SDD/SDD_Minutes/TDWG2000-SDD-Minutes_11.html. Accessed July 25 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Holetschek J, Döring M. 2008. Publishing specimen & observation records using BioCASe technology. In: Gradstein SR, Klatt S, Normann F, Weigelt P, Willmann R, Wilson R, editors. Systematics 2008 programme and abstracts, Göttingen 7–11 April 2008. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• King N, Krishtalka L, Chavan V. 2010. Thoughts on implementation of the recommendations of the GBIF task group on a global strategy and action plan for mobilisation of natural history collections data. J Biodiv Inform 7: 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Martellos S. 2010. Multi-authored interactive identification keys: The FRIDA (friendly identification) package. Taxon 59: 922–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martellos S, Attorre F, De Felici S, Cesaroni D, Sbordoni V, Blasi C, et al. 2011. Plant sciences and the Italian national biodiversity network. Plant Biosyst 145(4): 758–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martellos S, Nimis PL. 2008. KeyToNature: Teaching and learning biodiversity: Dryades, the Italian experience. In: Muñoz M, Jelìnek I, Ferreira F, editors. Proceedings of the IASK international conference teaching and learning, 26–28 May, Aveiro, Portugal. International Association for the Scientific Knowledge (IASK). pp. 863–868.
   Google Scholar
• Morris RA, Barve V, Carausu M, Chavan V, Cuadra J, Freeland C, et al. 2013. Discovery and publishing of primary biodiversity data associated with multimedia resources: The Audubon Core strategies and approaches. Biodiv Inform 8(2): 185–197.
   Google Scholar
• Nimis PL, Martellos S. 2001. Testing the predictivity of ecological indicator values: A comparison of real and virtual releves of lichen vegetation. Plant Ecol 157: 165–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimis PL, Martellos S. 2008. ITALIC, the information system on Italian lichens version 4.0. University of Trieste, Department of Biology. IN4.0/1. Available: http://dbiodbs.univ.trieste.it/. Accessed July 2013 25.
   Google Scholar
• Nimis PL, Martellos S. 2009. Computer-aided tools for identifying organisms and their importance for protected areas. J Eco Mont 1(2): 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Onofri S. 2005. Checklist of the Italian fungi: Basidiomycetes. Sassari: Delfino Carlo Editore. 384 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Randlane T, Saag A, Martellos S, Nimis PL. 2010. Computer-aided, interactive keys to lichens in the EU project KeyToNature, and related resources. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 105: 37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rovegno D, Martellos S, Guglielminetti M. 2005. Chiave morfo-fisiologica on-line dei funghi cheratinofili. Informatore Botanico Italiano 37(1, parte B): 866–867.
   Google Scholar
• Scoble MJ, Berendsohn WG. 2007. Networking biological collection databases: Building a European infrastructure. In: Curry G, Humphries C, editors. Biodiversity databases: Techniques, politics, and applications. Baton Rouge: CRC Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• TDWG. 2005. Access to Biological Collections Data (ABCD), version 2.06. ABCD task group, Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). Available: http://www.tdwg.org/standards/115/. Accessed July 2013 25.
   Google Scholar
• Varese GC, Anastasi A, Voyron S, Filipello Marchisio V. 2010. An interactive tool for the identification of airborne and food fungi. In: Nimis PL, Vignes Lebbe R, editors. Tools for identifying biodiversity: Progress and problems. Proceedings of the international congress, Paris, 20–22 September 2010. Trieste: EUT. pp. 183–187. ISBN: 9788883032950.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek J, Bloom D, Guralnick R, Blum S, Döring M, Giovanni R, et al. 2012. Darwin core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS ONE 7(1): e29715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz P, Kottman R, Field D, Knight R, Cole JR, et al. 2011. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat Biotechnol 29: 415–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar