Seed screening of three pine species for glyphosate sensitivity for forest restoration

References

• Afroze F, O’Reilly C. 2017. Effects of seed moisture content, warm, chilling, and exogenous hormone treatments and germination temperature on the germination of blackthorn seeds. Plant Biosyst. 151(3):474–483.10.1080/11263504.2016.1179693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2017a. Roundup® Star SL, 441 g l−1 a.e. Monsanto Gıda ve Tarım Tic Ltd. Sti.. Istanbul, Turkey. [ accessed 2017 June 23]. http://www.rayal.com.tr/images/icerikler/20131122110436_0.pdf. Turkish
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2017b. CropSmart®, Glyphosate 41 Plus Specimen Label. UCPA, LLC. Eagan (MN). [ accessed 2017 June 23]. http://www.cropsmart.net/Products/Glyphosate/CropSmart%2041%20Plus%20Label.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blair MP, Zedaker SM, Seiler JR, Hipkins PL, Burch PL. 2006. Evaluation of rapid screening techniques for woody plant herbicide development. Weed Technol. 20:971–979.10.1614/WT-05-123.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydak M, Çalıkoğlu M. 2008. Toros Sediri’nin (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) biyolojisi ve silvikültürü [The Biology and silviculture of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.]. Ankara (Turkey): Ormancılığı Geliştirme ve Orman Yangınları ile Mücadele Hizmetlerini Destekleme Vakfı Yayını, Lazer Ofset Matbaası. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Booth BD, Murphy SD, Swanton CJ. 2003. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural systems. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.10.1079/9780851995281.0000
   Google Scholar
• Bunn BH, Zedaker SM, Seiler JR. 1995. Presoaking improves forest tree seed screening. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society; Jan 16–18; Memphis (TN): SWSS. p. 129–130.
   Google Scholar
• Cap MC, Eşen D. 2017. Effects of application date and rate of foliar- applied glyphosate on pine seedlings in Turkey. J Res. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0498-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cendán C, Sampedro L, Zas L. 2013. The maternal environment determines the timing of germination in Pinus pinaster. Environ Exp Bot. 94:66–72.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compostella C, Caccianiga M. 2017. A comparison between different treeline types shows contrasting responses to climate fluctuations. Plant Biosyst. 151(3):436–449.10.1080/11263504.2016.1179695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dağlar C, Eşen D, Çetin B. 2016. Screening for metsulfuron methyl phytotoxicity in seeds of various pine species. DÜ Ormancılık Dergisi. 12(2):34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Doust SJ, Erskine PD, Lamb D. 2006. Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. Forest Ecol Manag. 234:333–343.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eşen D, Yıldız O, Sargıncı M, Güneş N. 2005. Ormancılıkta zararlı ot ilaçlarının kullanımı ve riskleri [Risk of using herbicides in forestry]. Ormancılık Dergisi 1(2). A.İ.B.Ü; p. 51–58. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Galatowitsch SM. 2012. Ecological restoration. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gavilán RG, Callaway RM. 2017. Effects of foundation species above and below tree line. Plant Biosyst. 151(4):665–672.10.1080/11263504.2016.1200687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genç M. 2012. Silvikültürün temel prensipleri (Principles of silviculture). Isparta (Turkey): SDÜ Orman Fakültesi Yayın. No: 44. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Greipsson S. 2012. Restoration ecology. Sudbury (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman DW, Stoddard MT, Springer JD, Crouse JE. 2017. Understory responses to tree thinning and seeding ındicate stability of degraded pinyon-juniper woodlands. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 70(4):484–492.10.1016/j.rama.2017.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ISTA] International Seed Testing Association. 1985. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci Technol. 13:307–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinks RL, Willoughby I, Baker C. 2006. Direct seeding of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.): the effects of sowing date, pre-emergent herbicides, cultivation, and protection on seedling emergence and survival. Forest Ecol Manag. 237:373–386.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löf M, Ersson BT, Hjältén J, Nordfjell T, Oliet JA, Willoughby I. 2016. Site preparation techniques for forest restoration. In: Stanturf JA, editor. Restoration of boreal and temperate forests. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; p. 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• [OGM] Orman Genel Müdürlüğü (General Directorate of Forestry) (Turkey). 2015. Türkiye Orman Varlığı 2015 (The Forest Resources of Turkey 2015). [ accessed 2017 May 05]. http://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Yayinlar/T%C3%BCrkiye%20Orman%20Varl%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Osiecka A, Minogue P. 2014. Herbicides registered for pine management in Florida – 2014: University of Florida IFAS Extension CIR475. [ accessed 2017 June 23]. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fr158.
   Google Scholar
• Owston PW, Abrahamson LP. 1984. Weed management in forest nurseries. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD, editors. Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk; p. 193–202.10.1007/978-94-009-6110-4
   Google Scholar
• Pesaresi S, Biondi E, Vegge I, Galdenzi D, Casavecchia S. 2017. The Pinus halepensis Mill forests in the central-eastern European Mediterranean basin. Plant Biosyst. 151(3):512–529.10.1080/11263504.2017.1302514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevich SR, Holt JS, Ghersa CM. 2007. Ecology of weeds and invasive plants: relationship to agriculture and natural resource management. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Wiley.10.1002/9780470168943
   Google Scholar
• Richard S, Moslemi S, Sipahutar H, Benachour N, Seralini GE. 2005. Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environ Health Perspect. 113(6):716–720.10.1289/ehp.7728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santopuoli G, Lasserre B, Di Martino P., Marchetti M. 2016. Dynamics of the silver fir (Abies alba Mill) natural regeneration in a mixed forest in the central apennine. Plant Biosyst. 150(2):217–226.10.1080/11263504.2014.948525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley W, Zedaker S, Seiler J, Burch P. 2014. Methods for rapid screening in woody plant herbicide development. Forests. 5:1584–1595.10.3390/f5071584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson AJ, El-Kassaby YA. 1993. Interpretation of seed-germination parameters. New Forest. 7(2):123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner RG, Newton M, Cole EC, Miller JH, Shiver BD. 2004. The role of herbicides for enhancing forest productivity and conserving land for biodiversity in North America. Wildl Soc Bull. 32(4):1028–1041.10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[1028:TROHFE]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby I, Clay D, Dixon F. 2003. The effect of pre-emergent herbicides on germination and early growth of broadleaved species used for direct seeding. Forestry. 76(1):83–94.10.1093/forestry/76.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedaker SM, Seiler JR. 1988. Rapid primary screening for forestry herbicides. In: Miller JH, editor. Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Southern Silviculture Research Conference; Nov 1–3; Memphis (TN), USA: USDA Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station. New Orleans (LA); p. 349–352.
   Google Scholar