Genetic diversity and molecular fingerprinting of Prunus cerasus var. austera from central Italy

References

• Antonius K, Aaltonen M, Uosukainen M, Hurme T. 2012. Genotypic diversity in Finnish cultivated sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 59:375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barac G, Ognjanov V, Obreh D, Ljubojevic M, Bosnjakovic D, Pejic I, Gasic K. 2014. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of cherry species collected in Serbia. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 32:92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghe D; Garcia M, Jose F; Fabbri A, et al. 2015. Olive biodiversity in Colombia. A molecular study of local germplasm. Scientia Horticoltirae. 189:122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush SB, Meng E. 1998. Farmer’s valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 45:139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke JB, Tobutt KR. 2003. Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites from Prunus avium ’Napoleon’. Mol Ecol Notes. 3:578–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rogatis A, Ferrazzini D, Ducci F, Guerri S, Carnevale S, Belletti P. 2013. Genetic variation in Italian wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) as characterized by nSSR markers. Forestry. 86: 391–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlewanger E, Claverie J, Wünsch A. Iezzoni AF. 2007. Cherry, In: Kole, C. editor. Fruits and nuts, genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants. Berlin: Springer. p. 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Downey SL, Iezzoni AF. 2000. Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J Am Soc Horticultural Sci. 125: 76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl DA, and von Holdt BM. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res. 4: 359–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of cluster of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 14:2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 7: 574–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria MA, Magalhães R, Ferreira MA, Meredith CP, Ferreira Monteiro F. 2000. Vitis vinifera Must Varietal Authentication Using Microsatellite DNA Analysis (SSR). J Agric Food Chem. 48:1096–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsad A Esna-Ashari. 2016. Genetic diversity of some Iranian sweet cherry (Prunus avium) cultivars using microsatellite markers and morphological traits. Cytol Genet. 50:8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascuel O. 1997. Concerning the NJ algorithm and its unweighted version, UNJ. In: Mirkin B, McMorris F, Roberts F, Rzetsky A, editors. Mathematical hierarchies and biology. DIMACS workshop, Series. Providence, R.I, USA: American Mathematical Society. Vol. 37, p. 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Höfer M and Peil A. 2015 Phenotypic and genotypic characterization in the collection of sour and duke cherries (Prunus cerasus and × P. ×gondouini) of the Fruit Genebank in Dresden-Pillnitz, Germany. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 62:551–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzoni A, Schmidt H, Albertini A. 1990 Cherries (Prunus spp.). In: Moore JN, editor. Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Wageningen, Netherlands: ISHS. p. 110–173
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M and Rosenberg NA. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodal in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics. 14:1801–1806.
   Google Scholar
• Keserović Z, Ognjanov V, Magazin N, Dorić M. 2014. Current situation and perspectives in sour cherry production. Sour Cherry Breeding COST action FA1104 Sustainable production of high-quality cherries for the European market Novi Sad, Serbia. 15.09.2014.–17.09.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Khaing AA, Moe KT, BaeK H-J, Park YJ. 2013. Genetic diversity and population structure of selected core set in Amaranthus using SSR markers. Plant Breed. 132:165–173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadivi-Khub A. 2014. Genetic relationships among cherry species with transferability of simple sequence repeat loci. Mol Biol Rep. 41: 6201–6210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KW, Chung HK, Cho GT, Ma KH, Chandrabalan D, Gwag JG, Jae-Gyun, Kim TS, Cho EG, Park YJ, Yong-Jin. 2007. PowerCore: a program applying the advanced M strategy with a heuristic search for establishing core sets. Bioinformatics. 23:2155–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopacka D, Markowski J, Płocharski W, Rozpara E. 2014. New or lesser known cultivar selection as a tool for sensory and nutritional value enhancement of osmo-convectively dried sour cherries. LWT – Food Sci Technol. 55: 506–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lācis G, Kota I. 2013. SSR Marker-based fingerprinting for sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) genetic resources identification and management. In: Evnas KM et al, editors. Proceedings of the 13th Eucarpia Symposium on Fruit Breeding and Genetics. Warsaw Poland: Acta Hort 976.
   Google Scholar
• Le Cunff L, Fournier-Leve LA, Laucou V, Vezzulli S, Lacombe T, Adam-Blondon AF, Boursiquot JM, This P. 2008. Construction of nested core collections to optimize the exploitation of natural diversity in Vitis vinifera L. subsp sativa. BMC Plant Biol. 8:31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin MA, Mattioni, C Cherubini M, Taurchini D, Villani F. 2010. Genetic characterisation of traditional chestnut varieties in Italy using microsatellites (simple sequence repeats) markers. Ann Appl Biol 157:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioni C, Martin MA,Cherubini M, Maccaglia E, DallaRagione I, Villani F. 2011. Molecular characterization and genetic diversity of Citrus aurantium L. germplasm from central Italy. Acta Hort. 918: 297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Mouhaddab J, Aadb NA, Msanda F, Filali-Maltouf A, Belkadi B, Ferradouss A, El Modafar C, Ibnsouda Koraichi S, Ghazal H, El Mousadik A. 2001. Moroccan J Biol. 13:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Nikkhah R, Ebadi A, Naghavi, M R et al. 2010. Application of SSR Markers for Characterization of Genetic Diversity within Iranian Grapevine Cultivars (Askari' and;Keshmeshi) Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 51:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics. 28:2537–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F. 2003. Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC, editors. Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Montpellier: Enfield, Science Publishers. p. 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP. 2006. DARwin software http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira-Lorenzo S, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Barreneche T, Mattioni C, Villani F, Díaz-Hernández M B, Martín LM and Martín A. 2017. Database of European chestnut cultivars and definition of a Core Collection using simple sequence repeats. Tree Genet Genomes (2017) 13:114–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugienius, R., Frercks, J.B., Siksnianienė, B., Stepulaitienė, I., Stanienė, G., Baniulis, D. and Stanys, V. (2015). Characterisation of genetic diversity of the Lithuanian sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) genetic resources using microsatellite markers. Acta Hortic. 1100, 105–108 DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1100.14 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1100.14
   Google Scholar
• Tavaud M, Zanetto A, David JL, Laigret F, Dirlewanger E. 2004. Genetic relationships between diploid and allotetraploid cherry species (Prunus avium, Prunus × gondouinii and Prunus cerasus). Heredity. 93:631–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testolin R, Marrazzo T, Cipriani G, Quarta R, Verde I, Dettori MT, Pancaldi M, Sansavini S. 2000. Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome. 43:512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toydemir G, Capanoglu E, Kamiloglu S, Boyacioglu D, de Vos RCH, Hall RD, Beekwilder J. 2013. Changes in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) antioxidants during nectar processing and in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. J Funct Food. 5: 1402–1413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp R. 1996. Biodiversity and modern crop varieties: sharpening the debate. Agric Hum Values. 13:48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto T, Hauck NR, Tao R, Jiang N, Iezzoni AF. 2006. Molecular characterization of three non-functional S-haplotypes in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus). Plant Mol Biol. 62: 371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Puyvelde K, Van Geert A, Triest L. 2010. ATETRA, a new software program to analyse tetraploid microsatellite data comparison with TETRA and TETRASAT. Mol Ecol Resour. 10: 331–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Treuren R, Kemp H, Ernsting G, Jongejan B, Houtman H, Visser L. 2010. Microsatellite genotyping of apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.) genetic resources in the Netherlands: application in collection management and variety identification. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 57:853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan SP, Russell K. 2004. Characterization of novel microsatellites and development of multiplex PCR for large-scale population studies in wild cherry, Prunus avium. Mol Ecol Notes. 4:429–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane H, Ikeda K, Hauck NR, Iezzoni AF, Tao R. 2003 Self-incompatibility (S) locus region of the mutated S6-haplotypes of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) contains a functional pollen S-allele and a non-functional pistil S allele. J Exp Bot. 54:2431–2434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar