Allowing for human socioeconomic impacts in the conservation of plants under climate change

References

• Alkemade R, Bakkenes M, Eickhout B. 2011. Towards a general relationship between climate change and biodiversity: an example for plant species in Europe. Reg Environ Change. 11(S1):143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Amici V, Landi S, Frascaroli F, Rocchini D, Santi E, Chiarucci A. 2015. Anthropogenic drivers of plant diversity: perspective on land use change in a dynamic cultural landscape. Biodivers Conserv. 24(13):3185–3199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo MB, Alagador D, Cabeza M, Nogues-Bravo D, et al. 2011. Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecol Lett. 14:484–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo MB, Thuiller W, Pearson RG. 2006. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J Biogeogr. 33(10):1712–1728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Schmitz MF, Herrero-Jáuregui C, Gutiérrez-Angonese J, Pineda FD, Montes C. 2018. Identifying socio-ecological networks in rural-urban gradients: Diagnosis of a changing cultural landscape. Sci Total Environ. 612:625–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arponen A, Heikkinen RK, Thomas CD, Moilanen A. 2005. The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: representation, species weighting, and benefit functions. Conserv Biol. 19(6):2009–2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avtzis DN, Stara K, Sgardeli V, Betsis A, Diamandis S, Healey JR, Kapsalis E, Kati V, Korakis G, Marini Govigli V, et al. 2018. Quantifying the conservation value of sacred natural sites. Biol Conserv. 222:95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenes M, Eickhout B, Alkemade R. 2006. Impacts of different climate stabilisation scenarios on plant species in Europe. Glob Environ Chang. 16(1):19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin RA. 2009. Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy. 11(4):854–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett. 15(4):365–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos L. 1999. Flora of Egypt, vol. 4. Cairo, Egypt: Al Hadara Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL. 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science. 313(5783):58–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butchart SHM, Clarke M, Smith RJ, Sykes RE, Scharlemann JPW, Harfoot M, Buchanan GM, Angulo A, Balmford A, Bertzky B, et al. 2015. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conserv Lett. 8(5):329–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeza M, Moilanen A. 2001. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol. 16(5):242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain ML, Milligan BG, Strand AE. 2000. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. Am J Bot. 87(9):1217–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD. 2010. Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention of Biological Diversity at its Tenth meeting. Convention on Biological Diversity. [Online]. Available: http://www.cbd.int/sp/
   Google Scholar
• Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. 2016. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).
   Google Scholar
• Ciarleglio M, Barnes JW, Sarkar S. 2010. ConsNet—A tabu search approach to the spatially coherent conservation area network design problem. J Heurist. 16(4):537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson TP, Jackson ST, House JI, Prentice IC, Mace GM. 2011. Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science. 332(6025):53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Minin E, Slotow R, Hunter LT, Montesino Pouzols F, et al. 2016. Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change. Sci Rep. 6:23814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Minin E, Soutullo A, Bartesaghi L, Rios M, Szephegyi MN, Moilanen A. 2017. Integrating biodiversity, ecosystem services and socio-economic data to identify priority areas and landowners for conservation actions at the national scale. Biol Conserv. 206:56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrovolski R, Loyola R, DA Fonseca GAB, Diniz-Filho JAF, Araújo MB. 2014. Globalizing conservation efforts to save species and enhance food production. BioScience. 64(6):539–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gabbas A, Baha El Din S, Zalat S, Gilbert F. 2016. Conserving Egypt's reptiles under climate change. J Arid Environ. 127:211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, H. Graham C, P. Anderson R, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, J. Hijmans R, Huettmann F, R. Leathwick J, Lehmann A, et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 29(2):129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faleiro FV, Loyola RD, Knight A. 2013. Socioeconomic and political trade-offs in biodiversity conservation: a case study of the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot, Brazil. Divers Distrib. 19(8):977–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fois M, Bacchetta G, Cogoni D, Fenu G. 2018. Current and future effectiveness ofthe Natura 2000 network for protecting plant species in Sardinia: a nice and complex strategy in its raw state? J Environ Plan Manag. 61(2):332–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fois M, Cuena-Lombraña A, Fenu G, Cogoni D, Bacchetta G. 2018. Does a correlation exist between environmental suitability models and plant population parameters? An experimental approach to measure the influence of disturbances and environmental changes. Ecol Indicat. 86:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin J. 2009. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Game ET, Grantham HS. 2008. Marxan User Manual: For Marxan version 1.8.10. Vancouver, BC: University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, and Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann A, Aitken SN. 2013. Conservation planning under climate change: accounting for adaptive potential and migration capacity in species distribution models. Divers Distrib. 19(3):268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah L. 2011. Climate change biology. London, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 25(15):1965–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones KR, Watson JEM, Possingham HP, Klein CJ. 2016. Incorporating climate change into spatial conservation prioritisation: a review. Biol Conserv. 194:121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaky E, Gilbert F. 2016. Using species distribution models to assess the importance of Egypt's protected areas for the conservation of medicinal plants. J Arid Environ. 135:140–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaky E, Gilbert F. 2017. Predicting the distributions of Egypt's medicinal plants and their potential shifts under future climate change. PLoS One. 12(11):e0187714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klorvuttimontara S, McClean CJ, Hill JK. 2011. Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas for conserving tropical forest butterflies of Thailand. Biol Conserv. 144(10):2534–2540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM. 2008. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv Biol. 22(3):610–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkala AS, Moilanen A. 2013. Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning. Biol Rev. 88(2):443–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach K, Zalat S, Gilbert F. 2013. Egypt’s protected area network under future climate change. Biol Conserv. 159:490–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margules CR, Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405(6783):243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez R, González-Megías A, Collingham Y, Fox R, Roy DB, Ohlemüller R, Thomas CD. 2007. Direct and indirect effects of climate and habitat factors on butterfly diversity. Ecology. 88(3):605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffett A, Garson J, Sarkar S. 2005. MultCSync: a software package for incorporating multiple criteria in conservation planning. Environ Model Softw. 20(10):1315–1322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Anderson BJ, Eigenbrod F, Heinemeyer A, Roy DB, Gillings S, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ, Thomas CD. 2011. Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. Ecol Appl. 21(5):1419–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Franco AMA, Early RI, Fox R, Wintle B, Thomas CD. 2005. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proc Biol Sci. 272(1575):1885–1891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Pouzols FM, Meller L, Veach V, et al. 2014. Zonation - Spatial conservation planning methods and software. Version 4. User Manual. Finland: C-BIG Conservation Biology Informatics Group Department of Biosciences University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Wintle BA. 2006. Uncertainty analysis favours selection of spatially aggregated reserve networks. Biol Conserv. 129(3):427–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP. 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro P, Polasky S, Ricketts T, Rouget M. 2006. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol. 21(12):681–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic N, Swart R, Alcamo J, Davis G, et al. 2000. Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold T, Gilbert F, Zalat S, El-Gabbas A, Reader T. 2009. Climate-based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna. J Biogeogr. 36(11):2085–2095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 520(7545):45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmesan C, Yohe G. 2003. Aglobally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 421(6918):37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrosillo I, Semeraro T, Zurlini G. 2010. Detecting the ‘conservation effect’ on the maintenance of natural capital flow in different natural parks. Ecol Econ. 69(5):1115–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Schapire RE, Blair ME. 2017. Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography. 40(7):887–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 190(3-4):231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimm SL, Russell GJ, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM. 1995. The future of biodiversity. Science. 269:347–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Draux H, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Bürgi M, Kizos T, Kuemmerle T, Primdahl J, Verburg PH. 2016. The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: a systematic review of the evidence. Land Use Policy. 57:204–214.
   Google Scholar
• Polasky S. 2008. Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105(18):6505–6506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing—R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 421(6918):57–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Aggarwal A, Garson J, Margules CR, Zeidler J. 2002. Place prioritization for biodiversity content. J Biosci. 27(4 Suppl 2):339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saupe EE, Papes M, Selden PA, Vetter RS. 2011. Tracking a medically important spider: climate change, ecological niche modeling, and the brown recluse (Loxosceles reclusa). PLoS One. 6(3):e17731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz MF, Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Herrero-Jauregui C, Diaz P, Matos DG, Pineda FD. 2018. People and nature in the Fuerteventura Biosphere Reserve (Canary Islands): Socio-ecological relationships under climate change. Envir Conserv. 45(1):20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz MF, Herrero-Jáuregui C, Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Sánchez IA, et al. 2017. Evaluating the role of a protected area on hedgerow conservation: The case of a Spanish cultural landscape. Land Degrad Develop. 28:833–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz MF, Matos DGG, De Aranzabal I, Ruiz-Labourdette D, Pineda FD. 2012. Effects of a protected area on land–use dynamics and socioeconomic development of local populations. Biol Conserv. 149(1):122–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semeraro T, Mastroleo G, Aretano R, Facchinetti G, Zurlini G, Petrosillo I. 2016. GIS Fuzzy Expert System for the assessment of ecosystems vulnerability to fire in managing Mediterranean natural protected areas. J Environ Manag. 168:94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slemp C, Davenport MA, Seekamp E, Brehm JM, Schoonover JE, Williard KW. 2012. Growing too fast”: local stakeholders speak out about growth and its consequences for community well-being in the urban–rural interface. Landsc Urban Plan. 106(2):139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC. 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102(23):8245–8250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WCS 2005. Last of the Wild Project, Version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global Human Influence Index (HII) Dataset (Geographic). Palisades, NY: Wildlife Conservation Society - WCS and Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).
   Google Scholar
• Williams P, Hannah LEE, Andelman S, Midgley GUY, Araújo M, Hughes G, Manne L, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R. 2005. Planning for climate change: identifying minimum-dispersal corridors for the cape proteaceae. Conserv Biol. 19(4):1063–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams PH. 2001. WORLDMAP Version 4. Priority areas for biodiversity. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/science/projects/worldmap.
   Google Scholar
• Wright AN, Schwartz MW, Hijmans RJ, Shaffer HB. 2016. Advances in climate models from CMIP3 to CMIP5 do not change predictions of future habitat suitability for California reptiles and amphibians. Climate Change. 134(4):579–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M-G, Zhou Z-K, Chen W-Y, Slik JWF, Cannon CH, Raes N. 2012. Using species distribution modeling to improve conservation and land use planning of Yunnan, China. Biol Conserv. 153:257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Xi X, Hoctor TS, Volk M. 2015. Integrating conservation costs into sea level rise adaptive conservation prioritization. Glob Ecol Conserv. 4:48–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar