The effect of extreme dehydration on photosynthetic activity of Sphagnum denticulatum cultivated genotypes from different habitats

References

• Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Salem MA, Nabi G, Sharma S. 2010. Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 30(3):161–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed CB, Rouina BB, Sensoy S, Boukhris M, Abdallah FB. 2009. Changes in gas exchange, proline accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities in three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes. Environ Exp Bot. 67(2):345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alboresi A, Gerotto C, Giacometti GM, Bassi R, Morosinotto T. 2010. Physcomitrella patens mutants affected on heat dissipation clarify the evolution of photoprotection mechanisms upon land colonization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107(24):11128–11133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso R, Elvira S, Castillo FJ, Gimeno BS. 2001. Interactive effects of ozone and drought stress on pigments and activities of antioxidative enzymes in Pinus halepensis. Plant Cell Environ. 24(9):905–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpert P. 2000. The discovery, scope, and puzzle of desiccation tolerance in plants. Plant Ecol. 151(1):5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker NR, Rosenqvist E. 2004. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot. 55(403):1607–1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Bio Sci. 15(3):413–428.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett RP, Hoddinott N. 1997. Seasonal variations in tolerance to ion leakage following desiccation in the moss Atrichum androgynum from a KwaZulu-Natal afromontane forest. South Afr J Bot. 63(5):276–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benomar L, Lamhamedi MS, Rainville A, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J, Margolis HA. 2016. Genetic adaptation vs. ecophysiological plasticity of photosynthetic-related traits in young Picea glauca trees along a regional climatic gradient. Front Plant Sci. 7:48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bewley JD, Tucker EB, Gwozdz EA. 1974. The effects of stress on the metabolism of Tortula ruralis. In: Bieleski RL, Ferguson AR, Cresswell MM, editors. Mechanisms of regulation of plant growth. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin. Wellington: Royal Society of New Zealand; p. 395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonera D, Gerotto C, Posocco B, Giacometti GM, Morosinotto T. 2012. NPQ activation reduces chlorophyll triplet state formation in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1817(9):1608–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho LC, Osório ML, Chaves MM, Amâncio S. 2001. Chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of photosynthetic functioning of in vitro grapevine and chestnut plantlets under ex vitro acclimatization. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 67(3):271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot. 103(4):551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot. 89(7):907–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordell S, Goldstein G, Mueller-Dombois D, Webb D, Vitousek PM. 1998. Physiological and morphological variation in Metrosideros polymorpha, a dominant Hawaiian tree species, along an altitudinal gradient: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Oecologia. 113(2):188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum HA. 2001. Structural diversity of bryophytes. 1st edn. Ann Arbor (MA): University of Michigan Herbarium.
   Google Scholar
• Csintalan Z, Proctor MC, Tuba Z. 1999. Chlorophyll fluorescence during drying and rehydration in the mosses Rhytidiadelphus loreus (Hedw.) Warnst., Anomodon viticulosus (Hedw.) Hook. & Tayl. and Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm. Ann Bot. 84:235–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui S, Hu J, Guo S, Wang J, Cheng Y, Dang X, Wu L, He Y. 2012. Proteome analysis of Physcomitrella patens exposed to progressive dehydration and rehydration. J Exp Bot. 63(2):711–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho RC, Branquinho C, Da Silva JM. 2011. Physiological consequences of desiccation in the aquatic bryophyte Fontinalis antipyretica. Planta. 234(1):195–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilks TJK, Proctor M. 1976. Seasonal variation in desiccation tolerance in some British bryophytes. J Bryol. 9(2):239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JH, Callaghan TV, Van Logtestijn RS. 2004. Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Glob Chang Biol. 10(1):93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Van Logtestijn RSP, Callaghan TV. 2006. Sphagnum modifies climate-change impacts on subarctic vascular bog plants. Funct Ecol. 20(1):31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim MK, Vogg G, Osman MN, Komor E. 1998. Photosynthetic performance and adaptation of sugarcane at suboptimal temperatures. J Plant Physiol. 153(5-6):587–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falqueto AR, da Silva Júnior RA, Gomes MTG, Martins JPR, Silva DM, Partelli FL. 2017. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence in two rubber tree clones. Sci Hortic. 224:238–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank W, Ratnadewi D, Reski R. 2005. Physcomitrella patens is highly tolerant against drought, salt and osmotic stress. Planta. 220(3):384–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao B, Li X, Zhang D, Liang Y, Yang H, Chen M, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wood AJ. 2017. Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: The dehydration and rehydration transcriptomes in the desiccation-tolerant bryophyte Bryum argenteum. Sci Rep. 7(1):7571.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Gen Subj. 990(1):87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdol R, Bonora A, Gualandri R, Pancaldi S. 1996. CO2 exchange, photosynthetic pigment composition, and cell ultrastructure of Sphagnum mosses during dehydration and subsequent rehydration. Can J Bot. 74(5):726–734.
   Google Scholar
• Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN. 2007. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol. 21(3):394–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glime JM. 2017. Bryophyte ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Vol. 1. Houghton: Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Chapter 7, Water relations. [accessed 2018 June 14]. http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/
   Google Scholar
• Goltsev V, Zaharieva I, Chernev P, Kouzmanova M, Kalaji HM, Yordanov I, Krasteva V, Alexandrov V, Stefanov D, Allakhverdiev SI, Strasser RJ. 2012. Drought-induced modifications of photosynthetic electron transport in intact leaves: analysis and use of neural networks as a tool for a rapid non-invasive estimation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1817(8):1490–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham LE, Kodner RB, Fisher MM, Graham JM, Wilcox LW, Hackney JM, Obst J, Bilkey PC, Hanson DT, Cook ME. 2004. Early land plant adaptations to terrestrial stress: a focus on phenolics. In: Hemsley AR, Poole I, editors. The evolution of plant physiology. London: Elsevier Academic Press; p. 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Granhall U, Hofsten AV. 1976. Nitrogenase activity in relation to intracellular organisms in Sphagnum mosses. Physiol Plant. 36(1):88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratani L. 2014. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Adv Bot. 2014:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Green BH. 1968. Factors influencing the spatial and temporal distribution of Sphagnum imbricatum Hornsch. ex Russ. in the British Isles. J Ecol. 56(1):47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green TA, Sancho LG, Pintado A. 2011. Ecophysiology of desiccation/rehydration cycles in mosses and lichens. In: Plant desiccation tolerance. Berlin: Springer; p. 89–120.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Y-Y, Yu H-Y, Kong D-S, Yan F, Zhang Y-J. 2016. Effects of drought stress on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of Lycium ruthenicum Murr. seedlings. Photosynthetica. 54(4):524–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hájek T, Beckett RP. 2008. Effect of water content components on desiccation and recovery in Sphagnum mosses. Ann Bot. 101(1):165–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hájek T, Vicherová E. 2014. Desiccation tolerance of Sphagnum revisited: a puzzle resolved. Plant Biol. 16(4):765–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamerlynck EP, Csintalan Z, Nagy Z, Tuba Z, Goodin D, Henebry GM. 2002. Ecophysiological consequences of contrasting microenvironments on the desiccation tolerant moss Tortula ruralis. Oecologia. 131(4):498–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraska M, Piotrowicz R. 1994. Vegetation of the chosen lobelian lakes and its relation to physicochemical properties of their waters. In: Kraska M, editor. Lobelia lakes: characteristics, functioning, and protection. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University; p. 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JA, Stewart GR. 1971. Desiccation injury in mosses. New Phytol. 70(6):1061–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In: Packer L, Douce R, editors. Methods in enzymology. Vol. 148. New York: Academic Press Inc; p. 350–382.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK, Babani F. 2004. Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus. Changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic activity. In: Chlorophyll a fluorescence. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 713–736.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. 1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans. 11:597–592.
   Google Scholar
• Limpens J, Raymakers JT, Baar J, Berendse F, Zijlstra JD. 2003. The interaction between epiphytic algae, a parasitic fungus and Sphagnum as affected by N and P. Oikos. 103(1):59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks RA, Burton JF, McLetchie DN. 2016. Sex differences and plasticity in dehydration tolerance: insight from a tropical liverwort. Ann Bot. 118(2):347–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall M, Borbely P. 2011. Photosynthetic responses of the desiccation intolerant Sphagnum angustifolium in relation to increasing its desiccation tolerance by exogenous ABA. Acta Biol Szeged. 55:119–121.
   Google Scholar
• Mayaba N, Beckett RP, Csintalan Z, Tuba Z. 2001. ABA increases the desiccation tolerance of photosynthesis in the afromontane understorey moss Atrichum androgynum. Ann Bot. 88(6):1093–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melosik I. 2008. The Sphagnum subsecundum complex (Sphagnaceae): morphological variability and taxonomic implications. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melosik I. 2008. The Sphagnum subsecundum complex (Sphagnaceae): Morphological variability and taxonomic implications. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press. Chapter 3, A new contribution of classic morphology to resolving the Sphagnum subsecundum complex on the basis of specimens from Europe, eastern North America and other regions; p. 65–179.
   Google Scholar
• Melosik I, Såstad SM. 2005. In vitro propagation of selected Sphagnum species (section Subsecunda). Lindbergia. 30:21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Meng L-L, Song J-F, Wen J, Zhang J, Wei J-H. 2016. Effects of drought stress on fluorescence characteristics of photosystem II in leaves of Plectranthus scutellarioides. Photosynthetica. 54(3):414–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchie EH, Lawson T. 2013. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. 64(13):3983–3998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naroui Rad MR, Kadir MA, Yusop MR. 2012. Genetic behaviour for plant capacity to produce chlorophyll in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under drought stress. Aust J Crop Sci. 6:415–420.
   Google Scholar
• Newton ME. 1972. Sex-ratio differences in Mnium hornum Hedw. and M. undulatum Sw. in relation to spore germination and vegetative regeneration. Ann Bot. 36(1):163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Pospíšilová J, Synková H, Haisel D, Baťková P. 2009. Effect of abscisic acid on photosynthetic parameters during ex vitro transfer of micropropagated tobacco plantlets. Biol Plant. 53(1):11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MC. 2001. Patterns of desiccation tolerance and recovery in bryophytes. Plant Growth Regul. 35(2):147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MC. 2003. Experiments on the effect of different intensities of desiccation on bryophyte survival, using chlorophyll fluorescence as an index of recovery. J Bryol. 25(3):201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor MC. 2014. The diversification of bryophytes and vascular plants in evolving terrestrial environments. In: Hanson DT, Rice SK, editors. Photosynthesis in bryophytes and early land plants. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor MC, Ligrone R, Duckett JG. 2007a. Desiccation tolerance in the moss Polytrichum formosum: physiological and fine-structural changes during desiccation and recovery. Ann Bot. 99(1):75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MC, Oliver MJ, Wood AJ, Alpert P, Stark LR, Cleavitt NL, Mishler BD. 2007b. Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: a review. The Bryologist. 110(4):595–621.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MC, Pence VC. 2002. Vegetative tissues: bryophytes, vascular resurrection plants and vegetative propagules. In: Black M, Pritchard H, editors. Desiccation and survival in plants: Drying without dying. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; p. 207–237.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor MC, Smirnoff N. 2000. Rapid recovery of photosystems on rewetting desiccation-tolerant mosses: chlorophyll fluorescence and inhibitor experiments. J Exp Bot. 51(351):1695–1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MC, Smirnoff N. 2011. Ecophysiology of photosynthesis in bryophytes: major roles for oxygen photoreduction and non-photochemical quenching? Physiol Plant. 141(2):130–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor MC, Smirnoff N. 2015. Photoprotection in bryophytes: rate and extent of dark relaxation of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. J Bryol. 37(3):171–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor M. 2000. Physiological ecology. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B, editors. Bryophyte biology Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.; p. 225–247.
   Google Scholar
• Puteh AB, Saragih AA, Ismail MR, Mondal M. 2013. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cultivated (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) and weedy rice (Oryza sativa L. var. nivara) genotypes under water stress. Aust J Crop Sci. 7:1277–1283.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson SA, Wasley J, Popp M, Lovelock CE. 2000. Desiccation tolerance of three moss species from continental Antarctica. Funct Plant Biol. 27(5):379–388.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin H, Rydin H. 1985. Effect of water level on desiccation of Sphagnum in relation to surrounding Sphagna. Oikos. 45(3):374–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagot C, Rochefort L. 1996. Tolérance des sphaignes à la dessiccation. Cryptogam Bryol Lichénologie. 17:171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipperges B, Rydin H. 1998. Response of photosynthesis of Sphagnum species from contrasting microhabitats to tissue water content and repeated desiccation. New Phytol. 140(4):677–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonbeck MW, Bewley JD. 1981. Responses of the moss Tortula ruralis to desiccation treatments. II. Variations in desiccation tolerance. Can J Bot. 59(12):2707–2712.
   Google Scholar
• Schonbeck MW, Bewley JD. 1981. Responses of the moss Tortula ruralis to desiccation treatments. I. Effects of minimum water content and rates of dehydration and rehydration. Can J Bot. 59(12):2698–2706.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W. 1986. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosyn Res. 10(1-2):51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster RM, Longton RE. 1983. Reproductive biology. In: Schuster RM, editor. New manual of bryology. Vol. 1. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory; p. 386–462.
   Google Scholar
• Seel WE, Baker NR, Lee JA. 1992. Analysis of the decrease in photosynthesis on desiccation of mosses from xeric and hydric environments. Physiol Plant. 86(3):451–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza RP, Machado EC, Silva JAB, Lagôa A, Silveira J. 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. Environ Exp Bot. 51(1):45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR. 2017. Ecology of desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: A conceptual framework and methodology. The Bryologist. 120(2):130–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, Greenwood JL, Brinda JC, Oliver MJ. 2014. Physiological history may mask the inherent inducible desiccation tolerance strategy of the desert moss Crossidium crassinerve. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 16(5):935–946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantaphylidès C, Havaux M. 2009. Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 14(4):219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt DH, Crandall-Stotler B, Wood AJ. 2014. Bryophytes, survival in a dry world through tolerance and avoidance. In: Rajakaruna N, Boyd RS, Harris T. B, editors. Plant ecology and evolution in harsh environments. New York (NY): Nova Science Publishers; p. 267–295.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner DJ, Titus JE. 1984. Comparative desiccation tolerance of two Sphagnum mosses. Oecologia. 62(2):182–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter-Shea EA, Norman JM. 1991. Leaf optical properties. In: Myneni BR, Ross J, editors. Photon-Vegetation Interactions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 229–251.
   Google Scholar
• Weston DJ, Timm CM, Walker AP, Gu L, Muchero W, Schmutz J, Shaw AJ, Tuskan GA, Warren JM, Wullschleger SD. 2015. Sphagnum physiology in the context of changing climate: emergent influences of genomics, modelling and host-microbiome interactions on understanding ecosystem function. Plant Cell Environ. 38(9):1737–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicka K, Melosik I, Wojciechowicz MK. 2018. Ultrastructure variations in Sphagnum denticulatum ecotypes in response to desiccation stress matter to conservation. Plant Physiol Biochem. 132:363–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicka K, Melosik I. 2019. Genetic and expression differences between putative ecotypes of Sphagnum denticulatum Brid. (Sphagnaceae: Bryophyta) subjected to drought stress and rehydration. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 37:39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood AJ. 2005. Eco-physiological adaptations to limited water environments. In: Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, editors. Plant abiotic stress. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wood AJ. 2007. The Nature and Distribution of Vegetative Desiccation-Tolerance in Hornworts, Liverworts and Mosses. Bryologist. 110(2):163–177.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M-Q, Chen R-K, Luo J, Lu J-L, Xu J-S. 2000. Analyses for inheritance and combining ability of photochemical activities measured by chlorophyll fluorescence in the segregating generation of sugarcane. Field Crops Res. 65(1):31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ye N, Mou S, Xu D, Fan X. 2013. Occurrence of the PsbS and LhcSR products in the green alga Ulva linza and their correlation with excitation pressure. Plant Physiol Biochem. 70:336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar