Smartphone-integrated field microscopy (SPFM): a low-cost and portable tool to study live biological specimens in the wild

References

• Askew RR, Blasco-Zumeta J. 1997. Parasitic Hymenoptera inhabiting seeds of Ephedra nebrodensis in Spain, with descriptions of a phytophagous pteromalid and four other new species of Chalcidoidea. J Nat Hist. 31:965–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskauf SJ, Kirchoff BK. 2008. Digital plant images as specimens: toward standards for photographing living plants. Vulpia 7:16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Beck J, Takano H, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Kitching J, McCain CM. 2018. Field sampling is biased against small ranged species of high conservation value: a case study on the Sphingid moths of East Africa. Biodivers Conserv. 27:3533–3544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekina A, Diebele I, Rubins U, Zaharans J, Derjabo A, Spigulis J. 2012. Multispectral assessment of skin malformations using a modified video-microscope. Latvian J Phys Tech Sci. 49:11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinder K, Humphreys AM, Ehrlen J, Alexandersson R, Ickert-Bond SM, Rydin C. 2016. From near extinction to diversification by means of a shift in pollination mechanism in the gymnosperm relict Ephedra (Ephedraceae, Gnetales). Bot J Linn Soc. 180:461–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles D. 2018. Wildlife photography: White wonders. Photography. 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Davis MJ, Andersen JC, Elkinton J. 2018. Identification of the parasitoid community associated with an outbreaking gall wasp, Zapatella davisae, and their relative abundances in New England and Long Island, New York. Ecol Evol. 9:19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delibes M, Blázquez MDC, Soriano L, Revilla E, Godoy JA. 2011. High antipredatory efficiency of insular lizards: A warning signal of excessive specimen collection? PLoS One. 6(12):e29312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich B, Wartmann R, Schadwinkel H, Heintzmann R. 2018. Using machine-learning to optimize phase contrast in a low-cost cellphone microscope. PLoS One. 13(3):e0192937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillen M, Groom Q, Chagnoux S, Güntsch A, Hardisty A, Haston E, Livermore L, Runnel V, Schulman L, Willemse L, et al. 2019. A benchmark dataset of herbarium specimen images with label data. Biodivers Data J. 7:e31817. https://dx.doi.org/10.3897%2FBDJ.7.e31817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliyahu D, McCall AC, Lauck M, Trakhtenbrot A, Bronstein JL. 2015. Minute pollinators: The role of thrips (Thysanoptera) as pollinators of pointleaf manzanita, Arctostaphylos pungens (Ericaceae). J Pollinat Ecol. 16:64–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falatoury AN, Assadi M, Ghahremaninejad F. 2015. A new species of Gypsophila (Caryophylloideae, Caryophyllaceae) from Iran. Phytotaxa 222:276–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk VA, Gostel M, Devine A, Kelloff CL, Wurdack K, Tuccinardi C, Radosavljevic A, Peters M, Coddington J. 2017. Guidelines for collecting vouchers and tissues intended for genomic work (Smithsonian Institution): Botany Best Practices. Biodivers Data J. 5:e11625. https://dx.doi.org/10.3897%2FBDJ.5.e11625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnatzy W, Volknandt W, Dzwoneck A. 2018. Egg-laying behavior and morphological and chemical characterization of egg surface and egg attachment glue of the digger wasp Ampulex compressa (Hymenoptera, Ampulicidae). Arthropod Struct Dev. 47:74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves MFM, Gomes SIL, Soares A, Scott-Fordsmand JJ, Amorim M. 2017. Enchytraeus crypticus fitness: effect of density on a two-generation study. Ecotoxicol 26:570–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand J, Cummings MP, Rebelo TG, Ricketts TH, Neel MC. 2007. Biased data reduce efficiency and effectiveness of conservation reserve networks. Ecol Lett. 10:364–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett BG, Walker MK, Rader R, Butler RC, Newstrom-Lloyd LE, Teulon D. 2011. Can insect body pollen counts be used to estimate pollen deposition on pak choi stigmas? N Z Plant Prot. 64:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hall DM, Steiner R. 2019. Insect pollinator conservation policy innovations: Lessons for lawmakers. Environ Sci Policy. 93:118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerle M, Hofle B. 2018. Mobile low-cost 3D camera maize crop height measurements under field conditions. Precis Agric 19:630–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman EJ, Yates CJ, Hopper SD. 2017. Botanical illustration and photography: a southern hemisphere perspective. Aust Systematic Bot. 30:291–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang TI, Reed DA, Perring TM, Palumbo JC. 2014. Feeding damage by Bagrada hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and impact on growth and chlorophyll content of Brassicaceous plant species. Arthropod Plant Interact. 8:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughey LF, Hein AH, Strandburg-Peshkin A, Jensen FH. 2018. Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild. Phil Trans R Soc B. 373(1746):20170005. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia YJ, Liu TX. 2018. Dynamic host-feeding and oviposition behavior of an aphid parasitoid Aphelinus asychis. Biocontrol Sci. 63:533–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuroo AA, Shapoo GA, Rasheed S, Kaloo ZA, Rafiq S. 2018. Goodyera fusca (Orchidaceae): a new record, for Kashmir Himalaya, India. Lankesteriana 18:151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Földesi R, Báldi A, Endrédi A, Jordán F. 2019. The vulnerability of plant-pollinator communities to honeybee decline: A comparative network analysis in different habitat types. Ecol Indic. 97:35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kross SM, Nelson XJ. 2011. A portable low‐cost remote videography system for monitoring wildlife. Methods Ecol Evol 2:291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini L, Brzezinski P. 2018. The demonstration that amongs myriads of palliative anticancer plants, there is one that is endowed by a synergical action: The Chenopodium album, that avoids the biotranformation of a benign skin tumor to malignant. Our Dermatol Online. 9:316–319.
   Google Scholar
• Meineke EK, Classen AT, Sanders NJ, Jonathan DT. 2019. Herbarium specimens reveal increasing herbivory over the past century. J Ecol. 107:105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AL, McCarthy MA, Parris KM, Moore JL. 2014. The optimal number of surveys when detectability varies. PLoS One. 9:e115345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalam VJ, Louis J, Patel M, Shah J. 2018. Arabidopsis-green peach aphid interaction: Rearing the insect, no-choice and fecundity assays, and electrical penetration graph technique to study insect feeding behavior. Bio-Protocol. 8(15):e2950. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2950-.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neghme CC, Santamaria L, Teuber MG. 2016. The role of pollination drops in animal pollination in the Mediterranean gymnosperm Ephedra fragilis (Gnetales). Plant Ecol. 217:1545–1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JD, Karanth KU, O’Connell AF. 2011. Science, conservation, and camera traps. In: O’Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU, editors. Camera traps in animal ecology. Tokyo: Springer; p. 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ohno YS, Yokoyama J, Nakashizuka T, Kawata M. 2017. Utilization of photographs taken by citizens for estimating bumblebee distributions. Sci Rep. 7:11215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osawa T, Yamanaka T, Nakatani Y, Nishihiro J, Takahashi S, Mahoro S, Sasaki H. 2017. A crowd sourcing approach to collecting photo-based insect and plant observation records. Biodivers Data J. 5(5):e21271. https://dx.doi.org/10.3897%2FBDJ.5.e21271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres M. 2017. Basic laboratory photography methods: Close-up photography, photomacrography, and stereomicroscopy. In Laboratory imaging & photography. United Kingdom: Routledge; p. 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Rather ZA, Wachkoo AA, Khuroo AA, Dar AR, Dar TH. 2019. First record of Aspicera hartigi (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) from India, with observations on its foraging behavior on Ephedra plants. J Asia Pac Biodivers. 12(3):473–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2019.03.007-.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivenson Y, Ceylan Koydemir H, Wang H, Wei Z, Ren Z, Günaydın H, Zhang Y, Göröcs Z, Liang K, Tseng D, et al. 2018. Deep learning enhanced mobile-phone microscopy. ACS Photonics. 5:2354–2364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samant SS, Pant S. 2006. Diversity, distribution pattern and conservation status of the plants used in liver diseases/ailments in Indian Himalayan region. J Mt Sci. 3:28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Skandarajah A, Reber CD, Switz NA, Fletcher DA. 2014. Quantitative imaging with a mobile phone microscope. PLoS One. 9(5):e96906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096906-.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow JW, Ceylan Koydemir H, Karinca DK, Liang K, Tseng D, Ozcan A. 2019. Rapid imaging, detection, and quantification of Nosema ceranae spores in honey bees using mobile phone-based fluorescence microscopy. Lab Chip. 19:789–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag O, Hufkens K, Teshera-Sterne C, Young AM, Friedl M, Braswel BH, Milliman T, O’Keefe J, Richardson AD. 2012. Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems. AFM 152:159–177.
   Google Scholar
• Switz NA, D'Ambrosio MV, Fletcher DA. 2014. Low-cost mobile phone microscopy with a reversed mobile phone camera lens. PLoS One. 9(5):e95330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095330-.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tihlarikova E, Nedela V, Shiojiri M. 2013. In situ study of live specimens in an environmental scanning electron microscope. Microsc Microanal. 19:914–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch K, Van Noort S, Cron GV. 2019. Predation of fruit and seed of Aloe pretoriensis - A little known effect on reproductive output in aloes. Austral Ecol. 44(4):621–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Sun M, Wang T, Wong MW, Huang D. 2018. A smartphone-based portable analytical system for on-site quantification of hypochlorite and its scavenging capacity of antioxidants. Sens Actuators B Chem. 283:524–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W. 2017. Smartphone photography in urban China. Int J Soc Behav Educ Econ Bus Industr Eng. 11:231–239.
   Google Scholar