Taxonomic implications of leaf epidermis in halophytes of Amaranthaceae from Salt Range of Punjab, Pakistan

References

• AbdulRahaman A, Oladele F. 2010. Leaf micromorphology of some Amaranthus. Niger J Pure Appl Sci. 23:2136–2143.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulrahaman AA, Oyedotun RA, Oladele FA. 2011. Diagnostic significance of leaf epidermal features in the family Cucurbitaceae. Insight Bot. 1(2):22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Alwadie HM. 2005. Morphology and distribution of three genera of Amaranthaceae in the southwestern area of Saudi Arabia. J King Saud Univ. 18(1):51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Barkla BJ, Vera-Estrella R. 2015. Single cell-type comparative metabolomics of epidermal bladder cells from the halophyte Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Front Plant Sci. 6:435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera B, Patnaik SN. 1974. Cytotaxonomic studies in the family Amaranthaceae. Cytologia. 39(1):121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentham G, Hooker J. 1880. Genera plantarum III. London: Lovell Reeve & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia RC. 1984. Foliar epidermal studies of Heliotropium supinum L. Folia Geobot Phytotaxon. 19(4):381–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmik S, Sil DC, Datta B. 2008. Epidermal morphology of two species of Alternanthera Forskal. Pleione. 2(2):229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Brown R. 1810. Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae. London: Johnson & Soc. p. 1–196.
   Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Christenhusz M, Fay M, Byng J, Judd W, Soltis D, Mabberley D, Sennikov A, Soltis P, Stevens P. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 181(1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J. 1960. Preparation of leaf epidermis for topographic study. Stain Technol. 35(1):35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa M, Tavares E. 2006. Anatomia foliar de Chenopodium ambrosioides L.(Chenopodiaceae)–erva-de-Santa Maria. Rev Bras Pl Med. 8(3):63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Cuadra VP, Hermann R. 2014. Anatomía foliar y caulinar de tres Salicornieae (Chenopodiaceae) halófilas argentinas. Phyton Int J Exp Bot. 83:369–377.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers A, Von Teichman I, Van Rooyen M, Theron G. 1996. Salinity-induced changes in anatomy, stomatal counts and photosynthetic rate of Atriplex semibaccata R. Br. S Afr J Bot. 62(5):270–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vogel E. 1987. Manual of herbarium taxonomy. Jakarta: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte MR, Debur MC. 2004. Characters of the leaf and stem morpho-anatomy of Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) O. Kuntze, Amaranthaceae. Rev Bras Ciênc Farm. 40(1):85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Edeoga H. 1991. Comparative morphology of the leaf epidermis in Costus afer-C. lucanusianus (Costaceae) complex and its systematic importance. Niger Ann Nat Sci. 24:1–243.
   Google Scholar
• El-Ghamery AA, Sadek AM, Abdelbar OH. 2017. Comparative anatomical studies on some species of the genus Amaranthus (Family: Amaranthaceae) for the development of an identification guide. Ann Agric Sci. 62(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• El Ghazali G, Al SA, Abdalla W. 2016. Epidermal micro-morphological study on stems of members of the family Chenopodiaceae. Appl Ecol Env Res. 14(4):623–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhalim MEA, Abo-Alatta OK, Habib S, Elbar OHA. 2016. The anatomical features of the desert halophytes Zygophyllum album LF and Nitraria retusa (Forssk.) Asch. Ann Agric Sci. 61(1):97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazanfar SA, Nasir YJ. 1986. Caryophyllaceae. Vol. 175. Karachi: Department of Botany, University of Karachi.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales WL, Negritto MA, Suarez LH, Gianoli E. 2008. Induction of glandular and non-glandular trichomes by damage in leaves of Madia sativa under contrasting water regimes. Acta Oecol. 33(1):128–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed M, Ashraf M, Ahmad MSA, Naz N. 2010. Plant adaptation and phytoremediation. Structural and functional adaptations in plants for salinity tolerance. Netherlands: Springer; p. 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain AN, Zafar M, Ahmad M, Khan R, Yaseen G, Khan MS, Nazir A, Khan AM, Shaheen S. 2018. Comparative SEM and LM foliar epidermal and palyno-morphological studies of Amaranthaceae and its taxonomic implications . Microsc Res Tech. 81(5):474–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iamonico D, Mosyakin S. 2018. Studies on Chenopodium album s.l. (Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae s.l.): Chenopodium pedunculare. Ann Bot. 8:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs S. 2001. Review of leaf anatomy and ultrastructure in the Chenopodiaceae (Caryophyllales). J Torrey Bot Soc. 128(3):236–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge L, Ferro V, Koschtschak M. 1986. Diagnose comparativa das espécies Chenopodium ambrosioides L. (erva-de-santa-maria) e Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm. (mastruço): principais características morfo-histológicas e químicas. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 1(2):143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Kadiri A, Olowokudejo J, Ogundipe O. 2005. Some aspects of foliar epidermal morphology of Cylicodiscus gabunensis (Taub.) Harms (Mimosaceae). J Sci Res Dev. 10(2005):33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kanwal D, Abid R. 2017. Taxonomic assessment of the family Amaranthaceae with special emphasis on seed morphology. Pak J Bot. 49:43–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Qaiser M. 2006. Halophytes of Pakistan: Characteristics, distribution and potential economic usages. In: Khan MA, Benno B, Kust GS, Barth HJ, editors. Tasks for vegetation science. Vol. 42, Sabkha ecosystems. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 129–153.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Weber DJ. 2006. Ecophysiology of high salinity tolerant plants. Vol. 40. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Koyro H, Geissler N, Hussin S, Debez A, Huchzermeyer B. 2008. Abiotic stress and plant responses. IK International Publishing House, New Delhi. Strategies of halophytes to survive in a salty environment; p. 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liao H, Bai L, Zhou X, Wu L. 2016. Comparative anatomy of Myosoton aquaticum and Stellaria media and its systematic significance. Pak J Bot. 48(4):1527–1535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M. 2006. Morphology and anatomy of seed plant. Beijing: Science Press; p. 121–268.
   Google Scholar
• Maas E, Nieman R. 1978. Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity. In: Jung GA, editor. Crop tolerance to suboptimal land conditions. Madison, WI: ASA Special Publications; p. 277–299.
   Google Scholar
• Mbagwu F, Edeoga H. 2006. Observations on the vegetative and floral morphology of some Vigna species (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Pak J Biol Sci. 9(9):1754–1758.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe C, Chalk L. 1972. Anatomy of the dicotyledons: leaves, stem, and Wood in relation to taxonomy with notes on economic uses. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe CRM, Chalk LC. 1979. Anatomy of the dicotyledons: wood structure and conclusion of the general introduction.-1983.-(RU-idnr: M104322271). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moris M, González J, Gallardo M, Prado F. 1996. Anatomical and functional differences and nyctinastic leaf movements in Chenopodium album L. and Chenopodium hircinum Schrad. (Chenopodiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 121(2):133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir M, Khan MA, Ahmad M, Abbasi AM, Zafar M, Khan KY, Tariq K, Tabassum S, Ahmed SN, Habiba U. 2011. Taxonomic potential of foliar epidermal anatomy among the wild culinary vegetables of Pakistan. J Med Plants Res. 5(13):2857–2862.
   Google Scholar
• Nazish M, Zafar M, Ahmad M, Sultana S, Ullah R, Alqahtani AS, Ullah F, Ahmad S, Ashfaq S, Ullah F. 2019. Palyno-morphological investigations of halophytic taxa of Amaranthaceae through SEM from Salt range of Northern Punjab, Pakistan. Microsc Res Tech. 82(3):304–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogundipe O, Kadiri A. 2012. Comparative foliar epidermal morphology of the West African species of Amaranthaceae Juss. Feddes Repert. 123(2):97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Padmini S, Shanmukharao SR. 1995. Structure, distribution and taxonomic importance of foliar stomata in some Indian Amaranthaceae. Bot J Linn Soc. 118(2):149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perveen A, Qaiser M. 2012. Pollen flora of Pakistan-LXX: Chenopodiaceae. Pak J Bot. 44(4):1325–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan-Ru C, Yan L. 2010. Micromorphology of leaf epidermis of Stellaria L. in north China. Bull Bot Res. 5:2.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman F, Ahmad M, Zafar M, Mumtaz A, Shah S. 2017. Taxonomic implications of foliar epidermis in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): investigating 12 Pakistani taxa as an example. Plant Biosyst. 151(4):642–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautio P, Markkola A, Martel J, Tuomi J, Härmä E, Kuikka K, Siitonen A, Riesco IL, Roitto M. 2002. Developmental plasticity in birch leaves: defoliation causes a shift from glandular to nonglandular trichomes. Oikos. 98(3):437–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimann C, Breckle S-W. 1988. Salt secretion in some Chenopodium species. Flora. 180(3–4):289–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodman JE, Oliver MK, Nakamura RR, McClammer JU, Jr, Bledsoe AH. 1984. A taxonomic analysis and revised classification of Centrospermae. Syst Bot. 9(3):297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sá RD, Santana AS, Silva FC, Soares LAL, Randau KP. 2016. Anatomical and histochemical analysis of Dysphania ambrosioides supported by light and electron microscopy. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 26(5):533–543.
   Google Scholar
• Safiallah S, Hamdi SMM, Grigore M-N, Jalili S. 2017. Micromorphology and leaf ecological anatomy of Bassia halophyte species (Amaranthaceae) from Iran. Acta Biol Szeged. 61(1):85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury E. 1932. The interpretation of soil climate and the use of stomatal frequency as an interesting index of water relation to the plant. Beih Bot Zentralb. 49(3):408–420.
   Google Scholar
• Shabala S. 2013. Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Ann Bot. 112(7):1209–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh N, Kumar Y. 2017. Foliar epidermal, stem and petiole anatomy of Meghalayan Dioscorea L. (Dioscoreaceae) and its systematic implication. Bangladesh J Plant Taxon. 24(1):53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stace CA. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bull Br Mus Nat His Bot. 4:1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Stefano M, Papini A, Brighigna L. 2008. A new quantitative classification of ecological types in the bromeliad genus Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae) based on trichomes. Rev Biol Trop. 56(1):191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebi SM, Rezakhanlou A, Isfahani GS. 2012. Trichomes plasticity in Ziziphora tenuior L. (Labiatae) in Iran: an ecological review. Ann Biol Res. 3(1):668–672.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne RF. 1976. Evolutionary biology. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Switzerland: Springer; p. 35–106.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens G. 1893. Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, editors. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol 1a. Leipzig: Engelmann; p. 36–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner GJ. 1991. Secreting glandular trichomes: more than just hairs. Plant Physiol. 96(3):675–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z-R, Lin Q. 2005. Comparative morphology of the leaf epidermis in Schisandra (Schisandraceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 148(1):39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousaf Z, Shinwari ZK, Asghar R, Parveen A. 2008. Leaf epidermal anatomy of selected Allium species, family Alliaceae from Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 40(1):77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhigila D, Yuguda U, Akawu J, Oladele F. 2015. Palynomorphs and floral bloom as taxonomic characters in some species of the genus Amaranthus l. (Amaranthaceae). Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci. 7(2):164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Zomlefer WB. 1994. Guide to flowering plant families. Chapel Hill (NC): Univ. North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar