Implementation of IUCN criteria for the definition of the Red List of Ecosystems in Italy

References

• Benson JS. 2006. New South Wales Vegetation Classification and assessment: introduction - the classification, database, assessment of protected areas and threat status of plant communities. Cunninghamia. 9(3):331–382.
   Google Scholar
• Blab J, Riecken U, Ssymank A. 1995. Proposal on a criteria system for a National Red Data Book of Biotopes. Landscape Ecol. 10(1):41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland LM, Keith DA, Miller RM, Murray NJ, Rodríguez JP. 2017. Guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria, version 1.1. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Capotorti G, Copiz R, Guida D, Mollo B, Smiraglia D, Zavattero L. 2014. Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosyst. 148(6):1255–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Capotorti G, Copiz R, Mollo B. 2018. A first revision of the Italian Ecoregion map. Plant Biosyst. 152(6):1201–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Zavattero L, Marignani M, Smiraglia D, Copiz R, Rosati L, Del Vico E. 2008. The concept of land ecological network and its design using a land unit approach. Plant Biosyst. 142(3):540–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Capotorti G, Alós Ortí MM, Anzellotti I, Attorre F, Azzella MM, Carli E, Copiz R, Garfì V, Manes F, et al. 2017. Ecosystem mapping for the implementation of the European Biodiversity Strategy at the national level: the case of Italy. Environ Sci Policy. 78:173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capotorti G, Guida D, Siervo V, Smiraglia D, Blasi C. 2012a. Ecological classification of land and conservation of biodiversity at the national level: the case of Italy. Biol Conserv. 147(1):174–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capotorti G, Zavattero L, Anzellotti I, Burrascano S, Frondoni S, Marchetti M, Marignani M, Smiraglia S, Blasi C. 2012b. Do National Parks play an active role in conserving the natural capital of Italy? Plant Biosyst. 146(2):258–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capotorti G, Alós Ortí MM, Anzellotti I, Azzella MM, Copiz R, Mollo B, Zavattero L. 2015. The MAES process in Italy: contribution of vegetation science to implementation of European Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Plant Biosyst. 149(6):949–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chytrý M, Hájek M, Kočí M, Pešout P, Roleček J, Sádlo J, Šumberová K, Sychra J, Boublík K, Douda J, et al. 2019. Red list of habitats of the Czech Republic. Ecol Indic. 106:105446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenu G, Bacchetta G, Giacanelli V, Gargano D, Montagnani C, Orsenigo S, Cogoni D, Rossi G, Conti F, Santangelo A, et al. 2017. Conserving plant diversity in Europe: outcomes, criticisms and perspectives of the Habitats Directive application in Italy. Biodivers Conserv. 26(2):309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin JF. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol Appl. 3(2):202–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigante D, Acosta ATR, Agrillo E, Armiraglio S, Assini S, Attorre F, Bagella S, Buffa G, Casella L, Giancola C, et al. 2018. Habitat conservation in Italy: the state of the art in the light of the first European Red List of Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats. Rend Fis Acc Lincei. 29(2):251–265.
   Google Scholar
• ISPRA. 2018. Territorio. Processi e trasformazioni in Italia. ISPRA, 296/2018, Roma. [accessed 2020 Oct 13]. https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/rapporti/territorio.-processi-e-trasformazioni-in-italia.
   Google Scholar
• ISTAT. 2020. Rapporto sul Territorio. Ambiente, economia e società. [accessed 2020 Oct 13]. https://www.istat.it/storage/rapporti-tematici/territorio2020/Rapportoterritorio2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Natural Capital Committee. 2017. 1st Report on the State of Natural Capital in Italy. Synthesis. [accessed 2020 Oct 13]. https://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/sviluppo_sostenibile/sintesi_raccomandazioni_primo_rapporto_capitale_naturale_english_version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Natural Capital Committee. 2018. Secondo Rapporto sullo Stato del Capitale Naturale in Italia [2nd Report on the State of Natural Capital in Italy]. [accessed 2020 Oct 13]. https://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/sviluppo_sostenibile/II_Rapporto_Stato_CN_2018_3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Natural Capital Committee. 2019. Terzo Rapporto sullo Stato del Capitale Naturale in Italia [3rd Report on the State of Natural Capital in Italy]. [accessed 2020 Oct 13]. https://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/sviluppo_sostenibile/iii_rapporto_stato_del_cn_maggio2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2001. IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2008. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 7.0. Standards and petitions working group for the IUCN species survival commissions biodiversity assessments subcommittee. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2016. An Introduction to the IUCN Red List of ecosystems: the categories and criteria for assessing risks to ecosystems. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, García Criado M, Gubbay S, Haynes T, Nieto A, Sanders N, Landucci F, Loidi J, Ssymank A, et al. 2016. European Red List of Habitats. Part 2. Terrestrial and freshwater habitats. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Keith DA. 2009. The interpretation, assessment and conservation of ecological communities. Ecol Manage Restor. 10(S1):S3–S15.
   Google Scholar
• Keith DA, Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Nicholson E, Aapala K, Alonso A, Asmussen M, Bachman S, Basset A, Barrow EG, et al. 2013. Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. PLoS One. 8(5):e62111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontula T, Raunio A. 2009. New method and criteria for national assessments of threatened habitat types. Biodivers Conserv. 18(14):3861–3876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Liquete C, Braat L, Berry P, Egoh B, Puydarrieux P, Fiorina C, Santos F, et al. 2013. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M, Murphy P, Paracchini ML, Barredo JI, Grizzetti B, Cardoso A, Somma F, Petersen J, et al. 2014. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Indicators for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, 2014, Publications office of the European Union; Luxembourg, (2nd Report – Final, February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• [MEA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson E, Keith DA, Wilcove DS. 2009. Assessing the threat status of ecological communities. Conserv Biol. 23(2):259–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss RF. 1996. Ecosystems as conservation targets. Trends Ecol Evolut. 11(8):351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsenigo S, Fenu G, Gargano D, Montagnani C, Abeli T, Alessandrini A, Bacchetta G, Bartolucci F, Carta A, Castello M, et al. 2020. Red list of threatened vascular plants in Italy. Plant Biosyst. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2020.1739165. Published online.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsenigo S, Montagnani C, Fenu G, Gargano D, Peruzzi L, Abeli T, Alessandrini A, Bacchetta G, Bartolucci F, Bovio M, et al. 2018. Red Listing plants under full national responsibility: extinction risks and threats in the vascular flora endemic to Italy. Biol. Conserv. 224:213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rega C, Short C, Pérez-Soba M, Paracchini ML. 2020. A classification of European agricultural land using an energy-based intensity indicator and detailed crop description. Landscape Urban Plan. 198:103793. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM. 2006. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evolut. 21(2):71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez JP, Balch JK, Rodríguez-Clark KM. 2007. Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv. 16(1):183–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez JP, Keith DA, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Murray NJ, Nicholson E, Regan TJ, Miller RM, Barrow EG, Bland LM, Boe K, et al. 2015. A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 370(1662):20140003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Baillie JEM, Ash N, Benson J, Boucher T, Brown C, Burgess ND, Collen B, Jennings M, et al. 2011. Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conserv Biol. 25(1):21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodwell J, Janssen J, Gubbay S, Schaminée J. 2013. Red List Assessment of European Habitat Types. A feasibility study. Service Contract No. 070307/2012/624047/SER/B3 with the European Commission, DG Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Smiraglia D, Capotorti G, Guida D, Mollo B, Siervo V, Blasi C. 2013. Land units map of Italy. J Maps. 9(2):239–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland WJ, Aveling R, Brooks TM, Clout M, Dicks LV, Fellman L, Fleishman E, Gibbons DW, Keim B, Lickorish F, et al. 2014. A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014. Trends Ecol Evol. 29(1):15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar