Can environment and genotype influence sweet cherry qualitative parameters?

References

• Albertini A, Della Strada G. 1996. Monografia di cultivar di ciliegio dolce. Rome, Italy: Istituto Sperimentale per la Frutticoltura.
   Google Scholar
• Alfaro S, Mutis A, Palma R, Quiroz A, Seguel I, Scheuermann E. 2013. Influence of genotype and harvest year on polyphenol content and antioxidant activity in murtilla (Ugni molinae Turcz) fruit. J Soil Sci Plant Nut. 13(1):67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Aguzzi J, Fanelli E, Ciuffardi T, Schirone A, De Leo FC, Doya C, Kawato M, Miyazaki M, Furushima Y, Costa C, et al. 2018. Faunal activity rhythms influencing early community succession of an implanted whale carcass offshore Sagami Bay, Japan. Sci Rep. 8(1):11163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballistreri G, Continella A, Gentile A, Amenta M, Fabroni S, Rapisarda P. 2013. Fruit quality and bioactive compounds relevant to human health of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars grown in Italy. Food Chem. 140(4):630–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini S, Leccese A, Viti R. 2015. Quality and antioxidant properties of apricot fruits at ready-to-eat: influence of the weather conditions under Mediterranean coastal area. J Food Process Technol. 7(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Braca A, Tommasi ND, Bari LD, Pizza C, Politi M, Morelli I. 2001. Antioxidant principles from Bauhinia tarapotensis. J Nat Prod. 64(7):892–895.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli D, Antonucci F, Costa C, Talento C, Ciccoritti R. 2020. An artificial class modelling approach to identify the most largely diffused cultivars of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in Italy. Food Chem. 333:127515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli D, Talento C, Favale S, Caboni E, Cecchini F. 2018. Phenolic compound profile characterization by Q-TOF LC/MS in 12 Italian ancient sweet cherry cultivars. Plant Biosyst. 152(6):1346–1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona MG, Resta P, Fanizza G, Palasciano M, Godini A. 1998. Prima indagine su varietà pugliesi di ciliegio dolce, (Prunus avium L.) mediante lo studio dei polimorfismi del DNA (RAPDs). Atti Convegno Nazionale Del Ciliegio. Valenzano (Bari), 19-21 Giugno 1997:201–214.
   Google Scholar
• Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P. 2003. Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Tec. 28(1):159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza VR, Pereira PAP, Da Silva TLT, de Oliveira Lima LC, Pio R, Queiroz F. 2014. Determination of the bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and chemical composition of Brazilian blackberry, red raspberry, strawberry, blueberry and sweet cherry fruits. Food Chem. 156:362–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettori MT, Micali S, Vendramin E, Giovinazzi G, Verde I. 2017. Ciliegio dolce. In BetMultimedia, editor. Atlante dei Fruttiferi Autoctoni Italiani. Vol. II. Roma: Consiglio per la ricerca e l’analisi dell’economia agraria. Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura. Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura; p. 698–701.
   Google Scholar
• Di Matteo A, Russo R, Graziani G, Ritieni A, Di Vaio C. 2017. Characterization of autochthonous sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) of southern Italy for fruit quality, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity. J Sci Food Agric. 97(9):2782–2794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escarpa A, González MC. 2001. Approach to the content of total extractable phenolic compounds from different food samples by comparison of chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods. Anal Chim Acta. 427(1):119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faniadis D, Drogoudi PD, Vasilakakis M. 2010. Effects of cultivar, orchard elevation, and storage on fruit quality characters of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Sci Hortic. 125(3):301–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT 2017. http://faostat.fao.org. (accessed 2020 December 1).
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes de Oliveira A, Nieddu G. 2016. Accumulation and partitioning of anthocyanins in two red grape cultivars under natural and reduced UV solar radiation. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 22(1):96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti G, Bacchetti T, Belleggia A, Neri D. 2010. Cherry antioxidants: from farm to table. Molecules. 15(10):6993–7005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girelli CR, De Pascali SA, Del Coco L, Fanizzi FP. 2016. Metabolic profile comparison of fruit juice from certified sweet cherry trees (Prunus avium L.) of Ferrovia and Giorgia cultivars: A preliminary study. Food Res Int. 90:281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE. 2001. Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins with UV- Visible spectroscopy. In: Wrolstad, RE, editors. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. New York: Wiley; p. F1.2.1–1.2.13.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer O, Harper DA, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica. 4:9.
   Google Scholar
• Italiafruit 2016. Ciliegie: tutti i dati su produzione, consumi, import-export. http://www.italiafruit.net/34996/la-categoria-del-mese/ciliegie-tutti-i-dati-su-produzione-consumi-import-export. (accessed 2020 November 22).
   Google Scholar
• Jacob RA, Spinozzi GM, Simon VA, Kelley DS, Prior RL, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA. 2003. Consumption of cherries lowers plasma urate in healthy women. J Nutr. 133(6):1826–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SY, Seeram NP, Nair MG, Bourquin LD. 2003. Tart cherry anthocyanins inhibit tumor development in ApcMin mice and reduce proliferation of human colon cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 194(1):13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DO, Heo HJ, Kim YJ, Yang HS, Lee CY. 2005. Sweet and sour cherry phenolics and their protective effects on neuronal cells. J Agric Food Chem. 53(26):9921–9927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 853.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulic-Petkovsek M, Schmitzer V, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberic R. 2012. Composition of sugars, organic acids, and total phenolics in 25 wild or cultivated berry species. J Food Sci. 77(10):C1064–C1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozetic B, Trebse P, Hribar J. 2002. Determination and quantitation of anthocyanins and hydroxycinnamic acids in different cultivars of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) from Nova Gorica region (Slovenia). Food Technol Biotech. 40(3):207–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirazzoli C, Palmieri A. 2019. Aspetti produttivi e di mercato dell’attuale cerasicoltura. Rivista di Frutticoltura e di Ortofloricoltura. 83:10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Poll L, Petersen M, Nielsen GS. 2003. Influence of harvest year and harvest time on soluble solids, titrateable acid, anthocyanin content and aroma components in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L. cv. "Stevnsbaer"). Eur Food Res Technol. 216(3):212–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Predieri S, Dris R, Rapparini F. 2004. Influence of growing conditions on yield and quality of cherry: II, Fruit quality. J Food Agric Environ. 2:307–309.
   Google Scholar
• Romano GS, Cittadini ED, Pugh B, Schouten R. 2006. Sweet cherry quality in the horticultural production chain. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 6:13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz-Eiberger MA, Blanke MM. 2012. Bioactive components in forced sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.), antioxidative capacity and allergenic potential as dependent on cultivation under cover. LWT. 46(2):388–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeram NP, Momin RA, Nair MG, Bourquin LD. 2001. Cyclooxygenase inhibitory and antioxidant cyanidin glycosides in cherries and berries. Phytomedicine. 8(5):362–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serradilla MJ, Lozano M, Bernalte MJ, Ayuso MC, López-Corrales M, González-Gómez D. 2011. Physicochemical and bioactive properties evolution during ripening of ‘Ambrunés’ sweet cherry cultivar. Food Sci Technol. 44(1):199–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solovchenko A, Schmitz-Eiberger M. 2003. Significance of skin flavonoids for UV-B-protection in apple fruits. J Exp Bot. 54(389):1977–1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulipani S, Marzban G, Herndl A, Laimer M, Mezzetti B, Battino M. 2011. Influence of environmental and genetic factors on health-related compounds in strawberry. Food Chem. 124(3):906–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usenik V, Fabcic J, Stampar F. 2008. Sugars, organic acids, phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Food Chem. 107(1):185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljevac VM, Krunoslav D, Ines M, Vesna T, Dominik V, Zvonimir Z, Puškar B, Zorica J. 2017. Season, location and cultivar influence on bioactive compounds of sour cherry fruits. Plant Soil Environ. 63(9):389–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhouse AL. 2003. Determination of total phenolics. In Wrolstad RE, editor. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. New York: Wiley; p. I1.1.1–1.1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Wünsch A, Hormaza JI. 2004. Molecular evaluation of genetic diversity and S-allele composition of local Spanish sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars Genet Resour Crop Ev. 51(6):635–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar