DNA barcoding evaluation of geophytes: Comparative efficiency of three barcode loci for Anemone (Ranunculaceae) and Gladiolus (Iridaceae)

References

• Amandita FY, Rembold K, Vornam B, Rahayu S, Siregar IZ, Kreft H, Finkeldey R. 2019. DNA barcoding of flowering plants in Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecol Evol. 9(4):1858–1868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardura A, Linde AR, Moreira JC, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2010. DNA barcoding for conservation and management of amazonian commercial fish. Biol Conserv. 143(6):1438–1443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford R. 1935. The chromosome number in Gladiolus. J Agric Res. 51:945–950.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett RDH, Hebert PDN. 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can J Zool. 83(3):481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergthorsson U, Adams KL, Thomason B, Palmer JD. 2003. Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants. Nature. 424(6945):197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieniek W, Mizianty M, Szklarczyk M. 2015. Sequence variation at the three chloroplast loci (matK, rbcL, trnH-psbA) in the Triticeae tribe (Poaceae): comments on the relationships and utility in DNA barcoding of selected species. Plant Syst Evol. 301(4):1275–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 10(4):e1003537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui QM, Heiko AS, Olga C, Dominik S, Michael DW, Arndt VH, Robert L. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol Biol Evol. 37(5):1530–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čandek K, Kuntner M. 2015. DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales. Mol Ecol Resour. 15(2):268–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor M, Tolety J. 2011. Gladiolus. In: Kole C, editor. Wild crop relatives: Genomic and breeding resources, plantation and ornamental crops. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-21201-7
   Google Scholar
• CBOL Plant Working Group. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. PNAS USA. 106:12794–12797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celiński K, Hanna K, Aleksandra WP, Katarzyna BC, Joanna S, Ewa C. 2017. Effectiveness of the DNA barcoding approach for closely related conifers discrimination: A case study of the Pinus mugo complex. C R Biol. 340(6-7):339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, Berg C, Madrinan S, Petersen G, Seberg O, Jorgsensen T, Cameron KM, Carine M, et al. 2007. A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon. 56(2):295–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Fay MF. 2009. Ecology. Barcoding of plants and fungi. Science. 325(5941):682–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, Haider N, Haidar N, Savolainen V. 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360(1462):1889–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costion C, Ford A, Cross H, Crayn D, Harrington M, Andrew L. 2011. Plant DNA Barcodes Can Accurately Estimate Species Richness in Poorly Known Floras. PLOS One. 6(11):e26841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PH. 1984. Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press, vol. 8; p. 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Davis PH, Coode MJE, Cullen J. 1965. Anemone in Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press, vol. 1; p. 134–138.
   Google Scholar
• Delabye S, Rougerie R, Bayendi S, Andeime-Eyene M, Zakharov EV, deWaard JR, Hebert PDN, Kamgang R, LeGall P, Lopez-Vaamonde C, et al. 2019. Characterization and comparison of poorly known moth communities through DNA barcoding in two Afrotropical environments in Gabon 1. Genome. 62(3):96–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir S, Çelikel FG. 2019. Endangered Gladiolus species of Turkey. Turkish JAF Scitech. 7(5):693–697.
   Google Scholar
• Duan H, Wang W, Zeng Y, Guo M, Zhou Y. 2019. The screening and identification of DNA barcode sequences for Rehmannia. Sci Rep. 9(1):17295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrendorfer F, Samuel R. 2001. Contributions to a molecular phylogeny and systematics of Anemone and related genera (Ranunculaceae-Anemoninae). Acta Phytotax Sin. 39:293–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N, Haider N, Stahl JV, Kelly LJ, Niklas W, Peter MH, Duff RJ, Sarah BH, et al. 2009. Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Biol J Linn Soc. 159(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Li Y, Phan LK, Yan L, Thomas P, Phan LK, Möller M, Li D. 2017. DNA barcoding of East Asian Amentotaxus (Taxaceae): Potential new species and implications for conservation. J Sytematics Evolution. 55(1):16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. 1996. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Giovino A, Marino P, Domina G, Scialabba A, Schicchi R, Diliberto G, Rizza C, Scibetta S. 2014. Evaluation of the DNA barcoding approach to develop a reference data-set for the threatened flora of Sicily. Plant Biosyst. 150(4):631–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P. 2001. Phylogeny and classification of the Iridaceae and the relationships of Iris. Irises and Iridaceae: biodiversity and systematics. Ann. Bot. 1:13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P, Manning JC, Bernhardt P. 2001. Radiation of pollination systems in Gladiolus (Iridaceae: Crocoideae) in southern Africa. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 88(4):713–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt P, Manning JC. 1998. Gladiolus in Southern Africa. Vlaeberg: Fernwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Güner A. 2012. Gladiolus. In: Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT, editors. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler) Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Press. İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Simmons MP, But PP-H, Shaw P-C, Wang RJ. 2011. Application of DNA barcodes in Hedyotis L. (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae). JSE. 49(3):203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Han J-P, Shi L-C, Chen X-C, Lin Y-L. 2012. Comparison of four DNA barcodes in identifying certain medicinal plants of Lamiaceae. JSE. 50 (3):227–234.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 22(2):160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, De Waard JR. 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270(1512):313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, De Waard JR. 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related animals. Proc Biol Sci. 270:S96–S99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2(10):e312–1663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth PM, Li D-Z, van der Bank M, Twyford AD. 2016. Telling plant species apart with DNA: From barcodes to genomes. Philos. 371:20150338.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth ML, Andra Clark A, Forrest LL, Richardson J, Pennington RT, Long DG, Cowan R, Chase MW, Gaudeul M, Hollingsworth PM. 2009. Selecting barcoding loci for plants: Evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Mol Ecol Resour. 9(2):439–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoot SB, Reznicek AA, Palmer JD. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships in Anemone (Ranunculaceae) based on morphology and chloroplast DNA. Syst Bot. 19(1):169–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horovitz A. 1995. The local gene pool of Anemone coronaria. Acta Hortic. 420(420):144–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hu H, Al-Shehbaz IA, Sun Y, Hao G, Wang Q, Liu J. 2015. Species delimitation in Orychophragmus (Brassicaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA barcodes. Taxon. 64(4):714–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang N, Zhou Z, Yang J-B, Zhang S-D, Guan K-Y, Tan Y-H, Yu W-B. 2017. Phylogenetic reassessment of tribe Anemoneae (Ranunculaceae): Non-monophyly of Anemone s.l. revealed by plastid datasets. PLoS One. 12(3):e0174792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh B, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Lars SJ. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 14(6):587–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Simon B, Alex C, Sidney M, Chris D, et al. 2012. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28(12):1647–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly LJ, Ameka GK, Chase MW. 2010. DNA barcoding of African Podostemaceae (river‐weeds): A test of proposed barcode regions. Taxon. 59(1):251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress JK, Erickson DL. 2008. DNA barcodes: Genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(8):2761–2762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress WJ, Erickson DL. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE. 2(6):e508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(23):8369–8374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q-J, Wang X, Wang J-R, Su N, Zhang L, Ma Y-P, Chang Z-Y, Zhao L, Potter D. 2019. Efficient identification of Pulsatilla (Ranunculaceae) using DNA Barcodes and micro-morphological characters. Front Plant Sci. 10:1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S. 2015. Plant DNA barcoding: From gene to genome. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 90(1):157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabberly DJ. 1997. The plant-book: A portable dictionary of the higher palnts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier R, Kwong S, Vaidya G, Peter KL. 2006. DNA Barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol. 55(5):715–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier R, Zhang G, Ali F. 2008. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the “barcoding gap” and leads to misidentification. Syst Biol. 57(5):809–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3(12):e422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee S. 2006. Birth-death models in macroevolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37(1):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S. 2006. DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Can J Bot. 84(3):335–341.
   Google Scholar
• Ohri D, Khoshoo TN. 1983. Cytogenetics of garden Gladiolus. IV. Origin and evolution of ornamental taxa. PNAS. 49:279–294.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer JD, Adams KL, Cho Y, Parkinson CL, Qiu YL, Song K. 2000. Dynamic evolution of plant mitochondrial genomes: Mobile genes and introns and highly variable mutation rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 97(13):6960–6966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang XH, Song JY, Zhu YJ, Xie CX, Chen SL. 2010. Using DNA barcoding to identify species within Euphorbiaceae. Planta Med. 76(15):1784–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis E, Schliep K. 2019. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics. 35(3):526–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettengill JB, Neel MC. 2010. An evaluation of candidate plant DNA barcodes and assignment methods in diagnosing 29 species in the genus Agalinis (Orobanchaceae). Am J Bot. 97(8):1391–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfenninger M, Carsten N, Christoph K, Dirk S, Bruno S. 2007. Utility of DNA taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species. Mol Ecol. 16(9):1957–1968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer. Version 1.5. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. 2018. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 67(5):901–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves G, Chase MW, Goldblatt P, Rudall PJ, Fay MF, Cox AV, Bernard L, Tatiana S-C. 2001. Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions. Am J Bot. 88(11):2074–2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren F‐M, Wang Y‐W, Xu Z‐C, Li Y, Xin T-Y, Zhou J-G, Qi Y-D, Wei X-P, Yao H, Song J-Y. 2019. DNA barcoding of Corydalis, the most taxonomically complicated genus of Papaveraceae. Ecol Evol. 9(4):1934–1945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieseberg LH, Wood TE, Baack E. 2006. The nature of plant species. Nature. 440(7083):524–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4(4):406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvaraj D, Sarma RK, Shanmughanandhan D, Srinivasan R, Ramalingam S. 2015. Evaluation of DNA barcode candidates for the discrimination of the large plant family Apocynaceae. Plant Syst Evol. 301(4):1263–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am J Bot. 94(3):275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Meena B, Pal AK, Roy RK, Tewari SK, Tamta S, Rana TS. 2017. Nucleotide diversity and phylogenetic relationships among Gladiolus cultivars and related taxa of family Iridaceae. J Genet. 96(1):135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza-Chies TT, Bittar G, Nadot S, Carter L, Besin E, Lejeune B. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of Iridaceae with parsimony and distance methods using the plastid gene rps4. Pl Syst Evol. 204(1-2):109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30(12):2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan K, Edmondson JR. 1984. Gladiolus L. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, Vol. 8; p. 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Tan SL, Luo Y‐H, Hollingsworth PM, Kevin SB, Xu K, Li D-Z, Gao L-M. 2018. DNA barcoding herbaceous and woody plant species at a subalpine forest dynamics plot in Southwest China. Ecol Evol. 8(14):7195–7205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Katy B, Urmas K. 2007. Ectomycorrhizal fungi of the Seychelles: diversity patterns and host shifts from the native Vateriopsis seychellarum (Dipterocarpaceae) and Intsia bijuga (Caesalpiniaceae) to the introduced Eucalyptus robusta (Myrtaceae), but not Pinus caribea (Pinaceae). New Phytol. 175(2):321–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuğ GN. 2012. Anemone. In: Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT, editors. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler) Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Press. İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayan K, Tsou CH. 2010. DNA barcoding in plants: taxonomy in a new perspective. Current Sci. 99:1530–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu F‐F, Gao Q, Liu F, Wang Z, Wang JL, Wang X‐G. 2020. DNA barcoding evaluation of Vicia (Fabaceae): Comparative efficacy of six universal barcode loci on abundant species. J Syst Evol. 58(1):77–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yessoufou K, Bezeng BS, Gaoue OG, Bengu T, van der Bank M. 2019. Phylogenetically diverse native systems are more resistant to invasive plant species on Robben Island, South Africa. Genome. 62(3):217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar