Next generation floristics: a workflow to integrate novel methods in traditional floristic research

References

• Archaux F. 2009. Could we obtain better estimates of plot species richness from multiple-observer plant censuses? J Veg Sci. 20(4):603–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archaux F, Gosselin F, Bergès L, Chevalier R. 2006. Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. J Veg Sci. 17(3):299–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedini G, Pierini B, Roma-Marzio F, Caparelli KF, Bonari G, Dolci D, Gestri G, D’Antraccoli M, Peruzzi L. 2016. Wikiplantbase #Toscana, breaking the dormancy of floristic data. Plant Biosyst. 150:601–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Kéry M, Plattner M, Ma K, Gardner B. 2013. Imperfect detection is the rule rather than the exception in plant distribution studies. J Ecol. 101(1):183–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Bacaro G, Scheiner SM. 2011. Old and new challenges in using species diversity for assessing biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 366(1576):2426–2437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Bonini I. 2005. Quantitative floristics as a tool for the assessment of plant diversity in Tuscan forests. For Ecol Manage. 212(1–3):160–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Di Biase RM, Fattorini L, Marcheselli M, Pisani C. 2018. Joining the incompatible: exploiting purposive lists for the sample-based estimation of species richness. Ann Appl Stat. 12:1679–1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Palmer MW. 2006. The inventory and estimation of plant species richness. Encyclopedia of life support systems, developed under the auspices of the UNESCO. Oxford: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell R, Coddington J. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond. B. 345:101–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antraccoli M, Bacaro G, Tordoni E, Bedini G, Peruzzi L. 2020. More species, less effort: designing and comparing sampling strategies to draft optimised floristic inventories. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 45:125547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antraccoli M, Roma-Marzio F, Carta A, Landi S, Bedini G, Chiarucci A, Peruzzi L. 2019. Drivers of floristic richness in the Mediterranean: a case study from Tuscany. Biodivers Conserv. 28(6):1411–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Peruzzi L. 2022. Maps of relative floristic ignorance and virtual floristic lists: an R package to incorporate uncertainty in mapping and analysing biodiversity data. Ecol Inform. 67:101512.
   Google Scholar
• Daru B, Park D, Primack R, Willis C, Barrington D, Whitfeld T, Seidler T, Sweeney P, Foster D, Ellison A, et al. 2018. Widespread sampling biases in herbaria revealed from large-scale digitization. New Phytol. 217(2):939–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett JM, Gould AJ, Macdonald SE, Nielsen SE. 2018. Investigating detection success: lessons from trials using decoy rare plants. Plant Ecol. 219(5):577–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk VA. 2006. Floras: a model for biodiversity studies or a thing of the past? Taxon. 55(3):581–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity, procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett. 4(4):379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood V. 2001. Floristics and monography. An uncertain future? Taxon. 50(2):361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkhan MA, Stafford EJ, Stohlgren TJ. 2007. Rapid plant diversity assessment using a pixel nested plot design: a case study in Beaver Meadows, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA. Divers Distrib. 13(4):379–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koellner T, Hersperger AM, Wohlgemuth T. 2004. Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale. Ecography. 27(4):532–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy M, Moore J, Morris W, Parris K, Garrard G, Vesk P, Rumpff L, Giljohann K, Camac J, Bau S, et al. 2013. The influence of abundance on detectability. Oikos. 122(5):717–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerman DE, Estabrook GF. 2006. The botanist effect: counties with maximal species richness tend to be home to universities and botanists. J Biogeogr. 33(11):1969–1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson IN, Nilsson SG. 1985. Experimental estimates of census efficiency and pseudoturnover on islands: error trend and between-observer variation when recording vascular plants. J Ecol. 73(1):65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer MW. 2005. Temporal trends of exotic species richness in North American floras: an overview. Écoscience. 12(3):386–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer MW, Earls PG, Hoagland BW, White PS, Wohlgemuth T. 2002. Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists. Environmetrics. 13(2):121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer MW, McGlinn DJ, Fridley JD. 2008. Artifacts and artifictions in biodiversity research. Folia Geobot. 43(3):245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer MW, Richardson JC. 2012. Biodiversity data in the information age: do 21st century floras make the grade? Castanea. 77(1):46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer MW, Wade GL, Neal P. 1995. Standards for the writing of floras. BioScience. 45(5):339–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi L. 2018. Floristic inventories and collaborative approaches: a new era for checklists and floras? Plant Biosyst. 152(2):177–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather LA, Alvarez-Fuentes O, Mayfield MH, Ferguson CJ. 2004. Implications of the decline in plant collecting for systematic and floristic research. Syst Bot. 29(1):216–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott WA, Hallam CJ. 2003. Assessing species misidentification rates through quality assurance of vegetation monitoring. Plant Ecol. 165(1):101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Steege H, Haripersaud PP, Bánki OS, Schieving F. 2011. A model of botanical collectors’ behavior in the field: never the same species twice. Am J Bot. 98(1):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp EA, Hoagland KE. 2013. Typifying an era in biology through synthesis of biodiversity information: achievements and impediments. Taxon. 62(5):899–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiser SK, Spencer N, De Cáceres M, Kleikamp M, Boyle B, Peet RK. 2011. Veg-X – an exchange standard for plot-based vegetation data. J Veg Sci. 22(4):598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol. 16(8):446–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Nielsen SE, Grainger TN, Kohler M, Chipchar T, Farr DR. 2014. Sampling plant diversity and rarity at landscape scales: importance of sampling time in species detectability. PLoS One. 9(4):e95334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar