Morphological characteristics of pollen and cypsela in the genus Rhaponticum (Asteraceae) from Turkey and their systematic significance

References

• Abid R, Qaiser M. 2009. Taxonomic significance of the cypsela morphology in the tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae) from Pakistan and Kashmir. Pak J Bot. 41:555–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid RD, Zehra N. 2007. Micromorphology of cypsela and its taxonomic significance of some genera in the tribe Inuleae from Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 39:1407–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adanson M. 1763. Families des plantes 2. Paris: Vincent.
   Google Scholar
• Avetisian EM. 1964. Palynosystématique de la tribu des Centaureinae des Asteraceae. [Palynosystematics of the tribe Centaureinae of the Asteraceae]. Erevan, Armenia: Trudy Botaniceskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk Armjanskoj SSR. 14:31–47. French.
   Google Scholar
• Aytuğ B, Aykut S, Merev N, Edis G. 1971. Pollen atlas of Istanbul. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthlott W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord J Bot. 1(3):345–355.
   Google Scholar
• Bean AR. 2001. Pappus morphology and terminology in Australian and New Zealand thistles (Asteraceae, tribe Cardueae). Austrobaileya. 6:139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Beentje H. 2010. The Kew plant glossary: an illustrated dictionary of plant terms. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. p. 180–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham G. 1873. Notes on the classification, history, and geographical distribution of Compositae. Bot J Linn Soc. 13(70–72):335–577.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore S. 1982. The apertures of Lactuceae (Compositae) pollen. Pollen Spores. 24:453–462.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore S. 1990. Sporoderm homologies and morphogenesis in land plants, with a discussion of Echinops sphaerocephala (Compositae). Plant Syst Evol. Suppl. 5:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore S, Wortley AH, Skvarla JJ, Robinson H. 2009. Evolution of pollen in Compositae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, editors. Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of compositae. Vienna, Austria: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT); p. 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bojňanský V, Fargašová A. 2007. Atlas of seeds and fruits of Central and East-European flora: the Carpathian Mountains region. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bona M. 2015. Systematic implications of achene characteristics in genera Centaurea L., Cyanus Mill., Psephellus Cass. and Rhaponticoides Vaill. (Asteraceae). Bangladesh J Plant Taxon. 22(2):125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bona M. 2020. Systematic importance of achene macro-micromorphological characteristics in selected species of the genera Crupina, Jurinea, and Klasea (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Microsc Res Tech. 83(11):1345–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briquet J. 1916. Etudes carpologiques sur les genres de Composées Anthemis, Ormenis et Santolina [Carpological studies on the genera of Compositae Anthemis, Ormenis and Santolina]. Annuaire Conserv Jard Bo. Genève. 18–19:257–313. French.
   Google Scholar
• Candan F, Uysal T, Tugay O, Bozkurt M, Ertuğrul K, Demirelma H. 2016. The examinations of achene ultrastructural features of section Acrolophus (Centaurea, Asteraceae) via scanning electron microscopy. Turk J Bot. 40:147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çeter T, Pınar NM, İnceer H, Hayırlıoğlu-Ayaz S, Yaprak AE. 2013. The comparative pollen morphology of genera Matricaria L. and Tripleurospemum Sch. Bip. (Asteraceae) in Turkey. Plant Syst Evol. 299(5):959–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coşkunçelebi K, Makbul S, Okur S. 2016. Studies on the achene morphology of Turkish species of Scorzonera L. (Asteraceae) using light and scanning electron microscopy. Phytotaxa. 247(1):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich M. 1968. Fruchtanatomische und zytologische Untersuchungen an einigen Arten der Gattungen Rhaponticum ADANS. und Leuzea DC. (Compositae) [Fruit anatomical and cytological studies on some species of the genera Rhaponticum ADANS. and Leuzea DC. (Compositae)]. Österr Bot Z. 115(3):379–390. French.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich M. 1970. Morphologische und anatomische untersuchungen an fruchten der Carduinae (Compositae) [Morphological and anatomical studies on the fruits of the Carduinae (Compositae)]. I. Morphologischer Teil. Candollea. 25:45–67. German.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich M. 1975. Rhaponticum Hill. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Island. Vol. 5. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; p. 460–461.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich M. 1977. Cynareae-systematic review. In: Heywood VH, editor. The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Vol. 2. London: Academic Press; p. 999–1015.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich M. 1983. Ochrocephala, eine neue afrikanische Compositengattung der subtribus Centaureinae [Ochrocephala, a new African genus (Compositae) of the subtribus Centaureinae]. Bot Jahrb Syst. 103:467–480. German.
   Google Scholar
• Ekim T. 2012. Rhaponticum. In: Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT, editors. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler) [A Checklist of the Flora of Turkey (Vascular Plants)]. İstanbul: Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını; p. 195. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy-angiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1969. Handbook of palynology, morphology, taxonomy and ecology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Faegri K, Iversen J. 1992. Textbook of pollen analysis. 4th ed. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frangiote-Pallone S, Souza LA. 2014. Pappus and cypsela ontogeny in Asteraceae: structural considerations of the tribal category. Rev Mex Biodivers. 85:62–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Robinson H. 2009. Classification of Compositae. In: Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Bayer RJ, editors. Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of Compositae. Vienna, Austria: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT); p. 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Jacas N, Susanna A, Garnatje T, Vilatersana R. 2001. Generic delimitation and phylogeny of the subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae): a combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Bot. 87(4):503–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire B, Gang US, Lee CH, Heo K, Jeong MJ. 2018. Cypsela morphology of Cirsium species (Asteraceae) and its systematic implications. Flora. 249:40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire B, Jeong MJ, Lee KM, Heo K, Lee CH, Gang US. 2016. Achene morphology of Saussurea species (Asteraceae, Cardueae) in Korea and its systematic implications. Bot J Linn Soc. 181(4):692–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower JC. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics. 27(4):857–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güner A, Karabacak E, Çıngay B, Eker İ, Güneş F, Keskin M, Körüklü T, Öztekin M. 2014. Bitki Terimleri [Plant Terms]. In: Güner A., Ekim T., editors. Resimli Türkiye Florası [Illustrated Flora of Turkey]. Vol. 1. İstanbul: Ali Nihat Gökyiğit Vakfı, Flora Araştırmaları Derneği and Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları; p. 469–472. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Haller A. 1742. Enumeratio methodica stirpium Helvetiae indigenarum [A recounting method of the native Helvetia]. Gottingae: Ex Officina Academica Abrami Vandenhook. Latin.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Garcia-Jacas N, Garnatje T, Susanna A. 2006. Phylogeny of Rhaponticum (Asteraceae, Cardueae-Centaureinae) and related genera inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data: taxonomic and biogeographic implications. Ann Bot. 97(5):705–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Susanna A, Garcia-Jacas N, Martin J. 2008. From acaveate to caveate: evolution of pollen types in the Rhaponticum group (Asteraceae, Centaureinea) related to extreme conditions. Bot J Linn Soc. 158(3):499–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill J. 1762. The vegetable system. Vol. 4. London: Printed at the expense of the author, and Sold by R. Baldwin, in Pater-Noster-Row.
   Google Scholar
• Holub J. 1973. Contribution to the taxonomy and nomenclature of Leuzea DC. and Rhaponticum Auct. Folia Geobot Phytotax. 8(4):377–395.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein HA, Eldemerdash MM. 2017. Comparative morphology and surface microsculpture of cypsela in some taxa of the Asteraceae and their taxonomic significance. Egypt J Bot. 56(2):409–422.
   Google Scholar
• İnceoğlu O. 1973. Pollen morphology of Asyneuma canescens (W.K.) Griseb. & Schenk and heteromorphy pollen grains. Türk Biyoloji Dergisi. 23:89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmuk NA, İnceer H, İmamoğlu KV. 2018. Achene micromorphology of 26 Crepis L. (Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on its systematic and ecological significance. Bott Let. 165(2):292–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaismailoğlu MC. 2015. Morphological and anatomical features of cypsela of some Crepis taxa (Asteraceae) from Turkey and their taxonomic importance. Pak J Bot. 47(4):1473–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmi SMA. 1963–1964. Revision der gattung Carduus (Compositae) I-II [Revision of the genus Carduus (Compositae) I-II]. Mitt Bot Staatssamml München. 5:139–198, 279–550. German.
   Google Scholar
• Köstekci S, Arabacı T. 2011. Cypsela morphology of Cirsium sect. Cirsium (Asteraceae) taxa in Turkey. Biologia. 66(6):988–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari J, Sharma KC, Sharma M. 2012. Micromorphology of fruit surfaces in some taxa of the tribe Astereae (Asteraceae) and their taxonomic significance. Indian J Plant Sci. 1:240–262.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach WL. 2013. MVSP – A MultiVariate Statistical Package, MVSP. Ver. 3.22. Pentraeth, Wales, UK: Kovach Computing Services. http://www.kovcomp.co.uk/downl2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni SV. 2013. SEM studies of achenes in some taxa of Asteraceae. Int J Environ Rehabil Conserv. 4:87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Kynclova M. 1970. Comparative morphology of achenes of the tribe Anthemideae Cass. (Asteraceae) and its taxonomic significance. Preslia. 42:33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Linnaeus C. 1753. Species plantarum. Vols. 1–2. Holmiae (Stockholm): Impensis Laurentii Salvii.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig CG. 1757. Institutiones historico physicae regni vegetabilis praelectionibus academicis accommodatae [Historical physical studies of the vegetable kingdom adapted to academic lectures]. 2nd ed. Lipsiae: Joh. Fridericum Gleditsch. Latin.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda H. 1928. On the origin of big pollen grains with abnormal numbers of chromosomes. Cellules. 38:213–243.
   Google Scholar
• Mesfin T, Crawford DJ, Smith EB. 1995. Pollen morphology of North Coreopsis (Compositae). Grana. 34(1):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mete D, A, Şahin A, Hamzaoğlu E, Pınar NM. 2021. Pollen morphology applied to species delimitation of Turkish Dianthus L. (Caryophyllaceae). Palynology. 45(4):599–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee SK, Sarkar AK. 2001. Morphology and structure of cypselas in thirteen species of the tribe Astereae (Asteraceae). Phytomorphology. 51:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherji S. 1951. Pollen analyses in Mangifera in relation to fruit set and taxonomy. J Indian Bot Soc. 30:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nair PK, Kaul KN. 1965. Pollen grain in a gigantic of Rauwolfia serpentine. Curr Sci India. 34:256–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbek MU, Koç M, Hamzaoğlu E. 2017. Rhaponticum pulchrum (Asteraceae), a new record for the Turkish Flora. Gazi Univ J Sci. 30(4):43–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbek MU, Özbek F, Başer B, Cabi E, Vural M. 2016. Pollen morphology of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) in Turkey. Bot Lett. 163(4):435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbek MU, Özbek F, Vural M. 2018. Achene morphology of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic significance. Turk J Bot. 42(2):208–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Akıncı N. 2019. Micromorpho-anatomical fruit characteristics and pappus features of representative Cardueae (Asteraceae) taxa: their systematic significance. Flora. 256:16–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pınar NM, Ekici M, Aytaç Z, Akan H, Çeter T, Alan Ş. 2009. Pollen morphology of Astragalus L. sect. Onobrychoidei DC. (Fabaceae) in Turkey. Turk J Bot. 33:291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt W, Hoen PP. 2009. The Northwest European Pollen Flora, 70: Asteraceae–Asteroideae. Rev Palaeobot Palyno. 157(1–2):22–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Thomas AL. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev Palaeobot Palyno. 143(1–2):1–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab-Straube EV. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Saussurea (Compositae, Cardueae) sensu lato, inferred from morphological, ITS and trnL-trnF sequence data, with a synopsis of Himalaiella gen. nov., Lipschitziella and Frolovia. Willdenowia. 33(2):379–402.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter MR, Miotto STS. 2006. Micromorphology of fruit surfaces in species of Mikania Willd. (Asteraceae) occurring in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras. 20(1):241–247.
   Google Scholar
• Rothmaler W. 1944. Nomina generica neglecta 1753-1763 [Generic names ignored 1753-1763. Feddes Repert. 53(1):1–37. Latin.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Labouriau ML. 1982. On cavities in spines of Compositae pollen. Grana. 21:97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Scopoli JA. 1760. Flora carniolica. Vienna: Joannis Thomae Trattner.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma BD. 1967. Pollen abnormalities in Helicteres isora L. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India. p. 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Skvarla JJ, Larson DA. 1965. An electron microscopic study of pollen morphology in the Compositae with special reference to the Ambrosiinae. Grana Palynologica. 6(2):210–269.
   Google Scholar
• Skvarla JJ, Turner BL, Patel VC, Tobb AS. 1977. Pollen morphology in the Compositae and in morphologically related families. In: Heywood VH, Harborne JB, Turner BL, editors. The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. London: Academic Press; p. 141–248.
   Google Scholar
• Soskov JD. 1959. K sistematike rodov Rhaponticum Adans. i Leuzea DC. Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. Komarov. Moskva et Leningrad. 19:396–408.
   Google Scholar
• Soskov JD. 1963. The genus Rhaponticum Adans. In: Shishkin BK, Bobrov EG, editors. Flora SSSR. Vol. 28. Moscow, Leningrad: Academy of Sciences; p. 308–322.
   Google Scholar
• Stix E. 1960. Pollen morphologische Untersuchungen an Compositen [Pollen morphological studies on Compositae]. Grana Palynologica. 2(2):41–114. German.
   Google Scholar
• Susanna A, Garcia-Jacas N. 2007. Tribe Cardueae (Compositae). In: Kadereit JW, Jeffrey C, editors. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 8. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Şirin E, Ertuğrul K, Uysal T. 2017. Achene micromorphology of the genus Cyanus Mill. (Compositae) in Turkey and its taxonomic importance. Phytotaxa. 313(1):77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talavera S, Valdes B. 1976. Revision del genero Cirsium (Compositae) en la Peninsula Iberica [Revision of the genus Cirsium (Compositae) in the Iberian Peninsula]. Lagascalia. 5:127–223. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Talukdar T. 2013. Cypsela diversity of the genus Inula L. (Inuleae) and its taxonomic implication. Online Int Interdiscip Res J. 3:259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant S. 1719–1723. Établissement de nouveaux caractères de trois familles ou classes de plantes à fleurs composées; sçavoir, des Cynarocéphales, des Corymbifères et des Cichoracées [Establishment of new characters of three families or classes of compound flowering plants; Cynarocephali, Corymbifera and Cichoraceae]. Mém Acad Royal Paris. 1718:223–224. French.
   Google Scholar
• Velari TC. 1982. Scanning electron microscopic studies of Centaurea L. s.s. pollen. Plant Biosyst. 116(5–6):201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenitz G. 1955. Pollenmorphologie und systematik in der gattung Centaurea L. s.1. [Pollen morphology and systematics in the genus Centaurea L. s.1.]. Flora. 142(2):213–279. German.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenitz G, Hellwig FH. 1996. Evolution of characters and phylogeny of the Centaureinae. In: Hind DJN, Beentje HJ, editors. Compositae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, 1994, Kew. Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens. p. 491–510.
   Google Scholar
• Wodehouse RP. 1935. Pollen grains. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zarembo EV, Boyko EV. 2008. Carpology of some East Asian Cardueae (Asteraceae). Anal Jardín Bot Mad. 65:129–134.
   Google Scholar