Beyond commonplace: effects of coppice management on understory plants. Evidences from Italian forests

References

• Albert CH, Grassein F, Schurr FM, Vieilledent G, Violle C. 2011. When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? Perspect Plant Ecol. 13(3):217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amici V, Santi E, Filibeck G, Diekmann M, Geri F, Landi S, Scoppola A, Chiarucci A. 2013. Influence of secondary forest succession on plant diversity patterns in a Mediterranean landscape. J Biogeogr. 40(12):2335–2347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammer C, Fichtner A, Fischer A, Gossner MM, Meyer P, Seidl R, Thomas FM, Annighöfer P, Kreyling J, Ohse B, et al. 2018. Key ecological research questions for Central European forests. Basic Appl Ecol. 32:3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampoorter E, Barbaro L, Jactel H, Baeten L, Boberg J, Carnol M, Castagneyrol B, Charbonnier Y, Dawud SM, Deconchat M, et al. 2020. Tree diversity is key for promoting the diversity and abundance of forest-associated taxa in Europe. Oikos. 129(2):133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampoorter E, Selvi F, Auge H, Baeten L, Berger S, Carrari E, Coppi A, Fotelli M, Radoglou K, Setiawan NN, et al. 2016. Driving mechanisms of overstorey–understorey diversity relationships in European forests. Perspect Plant Ecol. 19:21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartha S, Canullo R, Chelli S, Campetella G. 2020. Unimodal relationships of understory alpha and beta diversity along chronosequence in coppiced and unmanaged beech forests. Diversity. 12(3):101.
   Google Scholar
• Bartha S, Merolli A, Campetella G, Canullo R. 2008. Changes of vascular plant diversity along a chronosequence of beech coppice stands, central Apennines, Italy. Plant Biosyst. 142(3):572–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, Albano A, Alessandrini A, Ardenghi NMG, Astuti G, Bacchetta G, Ballelli S, Banfi E, et al. 2018. An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst. 152(2):179–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battisti C, Fanelli G. 2011. Does human-induced heterogeneity differently affect diversity in vascular plants and breeding birds? Evidences from three Mediterranean forest patches. Rend Fis Acc Lincei. 22(1):25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Becker G. 2018. Chapter 7 - “The Future of Traditional Coppice Forests in Europe: lessons Learned and Actions to be Taken”. In: A. Unrau, G. Becker, R. Spinelli, D. Lazdina, N. Magagnotti, V.N. Nicolescu, P. Buckley, D. Bartlett, P.D. Kofman, editors, Coppice Forests in Europe. Freiburg i. Br., Germany: Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg; p. 370–375.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12(12):1394–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondeel H, Landuyt D, Vangansbeke P, De Frenne P, Verheyen K, Perring MP. 2021. The need for an understory decision support system for temperate deciduous forest management. Forest Ecol Manag. 480:118634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricca A, Chelli S, Canullo R, Cutini M. 2020. The legacy of the past logging: how forest structure affects different facets of understory plant diversity in abandoned coppice forests. Diversity. 12(3):109.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley P. 2020. Coppice restoration and conservation: a European perspective. J Forest Res. 25(3):125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrascano S, Ripullone F, Bernardo L, Borghetti M, Carli E, Colangelo M, Gangale C, Gargano D, Gentilesca T, Luzzi G, et al. 2018. It’s a long way to the top: plant species diversity in the transition from managed to old-growth forests. J Veg Sci. 29(1):98–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrascano S, Sabatini FM, Blasi C. 2011. Testing indicators of sustainable forest management on understorey composition and diversity in southern Italy through variation partitioning. Plant Ecol. 212(5):829–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campetella G, Botta-Dukat Z, Wellstein C, Canullo R, Gatto S, Chelli S, Mucina L, Bartha S. 2011. Patterns of plant trait–environment relationships along a forest succession chronosequence. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 145(1):38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campetella G, Canullo R, Gimona A, Garadnai J, Chiarucci A, Giorgini D, Angelini E, Cervellini M, Chelli S, Bartha S. 2016. Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy. Appl Veg Sci. 19(3):474–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canullo R, Campetella G, Mucina L, Chelli S, Wellstein C, Bartha S. 2011. Patterns of clonal growth modes along a chronosequence of post-coppice forest regeneration in beech forests of Central Italy. Folia Geobot. 46(2–3):271–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canullo R, Simonetti E, Cervellini M, Chelli S, Bartha S, Wellstein C, Campetella G. 2017. Unravelling mechanisms of short-term vegetation dynamics in complex coppice forest systems. Folia Geobot. 52(1):71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrari E, Ampoorter E, Verheyen K, Coppi A, Selvi F. 2016. Former charcoal kiln platforms as microhabitats affecting understorey vegetation in Mediterranean forests. Appl Veg Sci. 19(3):486–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catorci A, Tardella FM, Cutini M, Luchetti L, Paura B, Vitanzi A. 2013. Reproductive traits variation in the herb layer of a submediterranean deciduous forest landscape. Plant Ecol. 214(5):737–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catorci A, Vitanzi A, Tardella FM, Hrsak V. 2011. Regeneration of Ostrya carpinifolia forest after coppicing: modelling of changes in species diversity and composition. Pol J Ecol. 59(3):483–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catorci A, Vitanzi A, Tardella FM, Hrsak V. 2012. Trait variations along a regenerative chronosequence in the herb layer of submediterranean forests. Acta Oecol. 43:29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervellini M, Fiorini S, Cavicchi A, Campetella G, Simonetti E, Chelli S, Canullo R, Gimona A. 2017. Relationships between understory specialist species and local management practices in coppiced forests–Evidence from the Italian Apennines. Forest Ecol Manag. 385:35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelli S, Bricca A, Cutini M, Campetella G, Cervellini M, Tsakalos JL, Canullo R. 2021b. Large standard trees and deadwood promote functional divergence in the understory of beech coppice forests. Forest Ecol Manag. 494:119324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelli S, Ottaviani G, Simonetti E, Campetella G, Wellstein C, Bartha S, Cervellini M, Canullo R. 2021a. Intraspecific variability of specific leaf area fosters the persistence of understorey specialists across a light availability gradient. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 23(1):212–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chianucci F, Puletti N, Venturi E, Cutini A, Chiavetta U. 2014. Photographic assessment of overstory and understory leaf area index in beech forests under different management regimes in Central Italy. For Studies. 61(1):27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarucci A, Nascimbene J, Campetella G, Chelli S, Dainese M, Giorgini D, Landi S, Lelli C, Canullo R. 2019. Exploring patterns of beta-diversity to test the consistency of biogeographical boundaries: a case study across forest plant communities of Italy. Ecol Evol. 9(20):11716–11723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciancio O, Corona P, Lamonaca A, Portoghesi L, Travaglini D. 2006. Conversion of clearcut beech coppices into high forests with continuous cover: a case study in central Italy. Forest Ecol Manag. 224(3):235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppi A, Lazzaro L, Ampoorter E, Baeten L, Verheyen K, Selvi F. 2019. Understorey phylogenetic diversity in thermophilous deciduous forests: overstorey species identity can matter more than species richness. Forest Ecosyst. 6:37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona P, Becagli C, Cantiani P, Chianucci F, Di Salvatore L, Di Salvatore U, Romano R, Vacchiano G, Ferretti F. 2020. Elementi di orientamento per la pianificazione forestale alla luce del testo unico in materia di foreste e filiere forestali. Rete Rurale Nazionale 2014–2020, Scheda n. 22.1 e 22.2 - Foreste, Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria, Roma. ISBN 978-88-3385-057-3.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley MJ, Harral JE. 2001. Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science. 291(5505):864–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutini A, Chianucci F, Giannini T, Manetti MC, Salvati L. 2015. Is anticipated seed cutting an effective option to accelerate transition to high forest in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) coppice stands? Ann Forest Sci. 72(5):631–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutini A, Ferretti M, Bertini G, Brunialti G, Bagella S, Chianucci F, Fabbio G, Fratini R, Riccioli F, Caddeo C, et al. 2021. Testing an expanded set of sustainable forest management indicators in Mediterranean coppice area. Ecol Indic. 130:108040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutini A, Mattioli W, Roggero F, Fabbio G, Romano R, Quatrini V, Corona P. 2018. Selvicoltura nei cedui italiani: le normative sono allineate alle attuali condizioni? Forest@. 15(1):20–28.
   Google Scholar
• De Lombaerde E, Baeten L, Verheyen K, Perring MP, Ma S, Landuyt D. 2021. Understorey removal effects on tree regeneration in temperate forests: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol. 58(1):9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Nicola C, Fanelli G, Testi A, Costa C, D’Angeli D, Pignatti S. 2017. Recovering ability of deciduous oak forest after different stages of tree cutting in Central Italy. Rend Fis Acc Lincei. 28(1):53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Alard D, Saguez R, Wattez-Franger A, de Foucault B, Delelis-Dusollier A, Bardat J. 2004. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understory response to two silvicultural systems. J Appl Ecol. 41(6):1065–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Longa G, Boscutti F, Marini L, Alberti G. 2020. Coppicing and plant diversity in a lowland wood remnant in North–East Italy. Plant Biosyst. 154(2):173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depauw L, Perring MP, Landuyt D, Maes SL, Blondeel H, De Lombaerde E, Brūmelis G, Brunet J, Closset-Kopp D, Czerepko J, et al. 2020. Light availability and land-use history drive biodiversity and functional changes in forest herb layer communities. J Ecol. 108(4):1411–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DL 34/2018 – TUFF. 2018. Decreto Legislativo 3 Aprile 2018 n. 34 Testo unico in materia di foreste e filiere forestali. (18G00060) (GU Serie Generale n.92 del 20-04-2018).
   Google Scholar
• Douda J, Boublík K, Doudová J, Kyncl M. 2017. Traditional forest management practices stop forest succession and bring back rare plant species. J Appl Ecol. 54(3):761–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbio G. 2016. Coppice forests, or the changeable aspect of things, a review. Ann Silvicultural Res. 40(2):108–132.
   Google Scholar
• Frati L, Brunialti G, Landi S, Filigheddu R, Bagella S. 2022. Exploring the biodiversity of key groups in coppice forests (Central Italy): the relationship among vascular plants, epiphytic lichens, and wood-decaying fungi. Plant Biosyst. 156(4):835–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garadnai J, Gimona A, Angelini E, Cervellini M, Campetella G, Canullo R. 2010. Scales and Diversity Responses to Management in Beech Coppice of Central Apennines. Vol. 46. Marches, Italy: From Floristic Relevés to Functional Groups. Braun–Blanquetia; p. 271–278.
   Google Scholar
• Genovesi P, Angelini P, Bianchi E, Dupré E, Ercole S, Giacanelli V, et al. 2014. Specie e Habitat di Interesse Comunitario in Italia: distribuzione, Stato di Conservazione e Trend. Serie Rapporti. Vol. 194. Rome, Italy: ISPRA; p. 330
   Google Scholar
• Giannetti F, Puletti N, Quatrini V, Travaglini D, Bottalico F, Corona P, Chirici G. 2018. Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands. Eur J Remote Sen. 51(1):795–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gondard H, Romane F, Santa Regina I, Leonardi S. 2006. Forest Management and Plant Species Diversity in Chestnut Stands of Three Mediterranean Areas. Biodivers Conserv. 15(4):1129–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaert S, Meeussen C, Vanneste T, Bollmann K, Brunet J, Cousins SAO, Diekmann M, Graae BJ, Hedwall P, Heinken T, et al. 2020. Edge influence on understorey plant communities depends on forest management. J Veg Sci. 31(2):281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaert S, Vangansbeke P, Blondeel H, De Lombaerde E, Verheyen K, De Frenne P. 2021. Forest understorey plant responses to long-term experimental warming, light and nitrogen addition. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 23(6):1051–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grime JP. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecology. 86(6):902–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INFC. 2015. Le foreste italiane. Sintesi dei risultati del terzo inventario forestale. INFC 2015. Arma dei Carabinieri Comando Unità Forestali, Ambientali e Agroalimentari, Ufficio Studi e Progetti; CREA - Centro di ricerca Foreste e Legno. Tipografia Supernova (TN). ISBN: 978-88-338-5140-2.
   Google Scholar
• Landuyt D, De Lombaerde E, Perring MP, Hertzog LR, Ampoorter E, Maes SL, De Frenne P, Ma S, Proesmans W, Blondeel H, et al. 2019. The functional role of temperate forest understorey vegetation in a changing world. Glob Chang Biol. 25(11):3625–3641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landuyt D, Perring MP, Seidl R, Taubert F, Verbeeck H, Verheyen K. 2018. Modelling understorey dynamics in temperate forests under global change–Challenges and perspectives. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 31:44–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livoreil B, Glanville J, Haddaway NR, Bayliss H, Bethel A, de Lachapelle FF, Robalino S, Savilaakso S, Zhou W, Petrokofsky G, et al. 2017. Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources. Environ Evid. 6(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Lebrija-Trejos E, Martínez-Ramos M, Meave JA, Paz H, Pérez-García EA, Romero-Pérez IE, Tauro A, Bongers F, et al. 2013. Successional changes in functional composition contrast for dry and wet tropical forest. Ecology. 94(6):1211–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairota P, Manetti MC, Amorini E, Pelleri F, Terradura M, Frattegiani M, Savini P, Grohmann F, Mori P, Terzuolo PG, et al. 2016. Opportunities for coppice management at the landscape level: the Italian experience. iForest. 9(5):775–782.
   Google Scholar
• Mairota P, Neri F, Travaglini D, Picchio R, Terzuolo PG, Piussi P, Marchi E. 2018. Chapter 6 – “Thirty-five countries. In: A. Unrau, G. Becker, R. Spinelli, D. Lazdina, N. Magagnotti, V.N. Nicolescu, P. Buckley, D. Bartlett, P.D. Kofman, editors. Coppice Forests in Europe. Freiburg i. Br., Germany: albert Ludwig University of Freiburg; p. 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Mattioli W, Ferrara C, Lombardo E, Barbati A, Salvati L, Tomao A. 2022. Estimating wildfire suppression costs: a systematic review. Int Forest Rev. 24(1):15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli W, Ferrari B, Giuliarelli D, Mancini LD, Portoghesi L, Corona P. 2015. Conversion of mountain beech coppices into high forest: an example for ecological intensification. Environ Manage. 56(5):1159–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli W, Mancini LD, Portoghesi L, Corona P. 2016. Biodiversity conservation and forest management: the case of the sweet chestnut coppice stands in Central Italy. Plant Biosyst. 150(3):592–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli W, Pinelli A, Filibeck G, Portoghesi L, Scoppola A, Corona P. 2008. Relationships between silvicultural system, forest type and floristic diversity in chestnut coppices. Forest@. 5(1):136–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mei G, Pesaresi S, Corti G, Cocco S, Colpi C, Taffetani F. 2020. Changes in vascular plant species composition, top-soil and seed-bank along coppice rotation in an Ostrya carpinifolia forest. Plant Biosyst. 154(2):259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllerová J, Hédl R, Szabó P. 2015. Coppice abandonment and its implications for species diversity in forest vegetation. For Ecol Manage. 343:88–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyland RD. 2016. Silviculture: concepts and applications. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara KL. 2016. What is close-to-nature silviculture in a changing world? Forestry. 89(1):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviani G, Götzenberger L, Bacaro G, Chiarucci A, de Bello F, Marcantonio M. 2019. A multifaceted approach for beech forest conservation: environmental drivers of understory plant diversity. Flora. 256:85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA 1989. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens, G.E., editor. Long-term Studies in Ecology. New York: Springer; p. 110–135.
   Google Scholar
• Pillar VD, Blanco CC, Müller SC, Sosinski EE, Joner F, Duarte LD. 2013. Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities. J Veg Sci. 24(5):963–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piovesan G, Di Filippo A, Alessandrini A, Biondi F, Schirone B. 2005. Structure, dynamics and dendroecology of an old-growth Fagus forest in the Apennines. J Veg Sci. 16(1):13–28.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piussi P. 2006. Close to nature forestry criteria and coppice management. Book chapter in “Nature-based forestry in central Europe: alternatives to industrial forestry and strict preservation”. pp.27-37 ref.10. Department of forestry and Renewable Forest Resources – Biotechnical Faculty – University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Puletti N, Galluzzi M, Grotti M, Ferrara C. 2021. Characterizing subcanopy structure of Mediterranean forests by terrestrial laser scanning data. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ. 24:100620.
   Google Scholar
• Radtke A, Ambraß S, Zerbe S, Tonon G, Fontana V, Ammer C. 2013. Traditional coppice forest management drives the invasion of Ailanthus altissima and Robinia pseudoacacia into deciduous forests. Forest Ecol Manag. 291:308–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocchini D, Balkenhol N, Carter GA, Foody GM, Gillespie TW, He KS, Kark S, Levin N, Lucas K, Luoto M, et al. 2010. Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: recent advances and open challenges. Ecol Inf. 5(5):318–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini FM, de Andrade RB, Paillet Y, Ódor P, Bouget C, Campagnaro T, Gosselin F, Janssen P, Mattioli W, Nascimbene J, et al. 2019. Trade-offs between carbon stocks and biodiversity in European temperate forests. Glob Chang Biol. 25(2):536–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammul M, Kull K, Niitla T, Mols T. 2004. A comparison of plant communities on the basis of their clonal growth patterns. Evol Ecol. 18(5–6):443–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Oswald H, Piussi P, Radoglou K. 2000. Forests of the Mediterranean region: gaps in knowledge and research needs. Forest Ecol Manag. 132(1):97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolastri A, Cancellieri L, Iocchi M, Cutini M. 2014. Patterns of floristic variation on a montane beech forest in the central Apennines (Central Italy). Plant Sociol. 51(2):69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Scolastri A, Cancellieri L, Iocchi M, Cutini M. 2017a. Old Coppice vs High Forest: the impact of beech forest management on plant species diversity in central Apennines (Italy). J Plant Ecol. 10(2):271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolastri A, Bricca A, Cancellieri L, Cutini M. 2017b. Understory functional response to different management strategies in Mediterranean beech forests (central Apennines, Italy). Forest Ecol Manag. 400:665–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore AK, Coops NC, Neinavaz E, Ali A, Schaepman ME, Paganini M, Kissling WD, Vihervaara P, Darvishzadeh R, Feilhauer H, et al. 2021. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat Ecol Evol. 5(7):896–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slach T, Volařík D, Maděra P. 2021. Dwindling coppice woods in Central Europe – disappearing natural and cultural heritage. Forest Ecol Manag. 501:119687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takacs B, Borrion A. 2020. The use of life cycle-based approaches in the food service sector to improve sustainability: a systematic review. Sustainability. 12(9):3504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburlin D, Torresani M, Tomelleri E, Tonon G, Rocchini D. 2021. Testing the height variation hypothesis with the R Rasterdiv package for tree species diversity estimation. Remote Sens. 13(18):3569.
   Google Scholar
• Tardella FM, Postiglione N, Tavoloni M, Catorci A. 2019. Changes in species and functional composition in the herb layer of sub-Mediterranean Ostrya carpinifolia abandoned coppices. Plant Ecol. 220(11):1043–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardella FM, Postiglione N, Vitanzi A, Catorci A. 2017. The effects of environmental features and overstory composition on the understory species assemblage in sub-Mediterranean coppiced woods: implications for a sustainable forest management. Polish J Ecol. 65(2):167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonteri T, Salemaa M, Rautio P, Hallikainen V, Korpela L, Merilä P. 2016. Forest management regulates temporal change in the cover of boreal plant species. Forest Ecol Manag. 381:115–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torresani M, Rocchini D, Sonnenschein R, Zebisch M, Hauffe HC, Heym M, Pretzsch H, Tonon G. 2020. Height variation hypothesis: a new approach for estimating forest species diversity with CHM LiDAR data. Ecol Indic. 117:106520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacchiano G, Meloni F, Ferrarato M, Freppaz M, Chiaretta G, Motta R, Lonati M. 2016. Frequent coppicing deteriorates the conservation status of black alder forests in the Po plain (Northern Italy). Forest Ecol Manag. 382:31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar