The staminal column in Solanum pollination: important in attraction, essential as a landing platform

References

• Anderson GJ, Anderson MK, Patel N. 2015. The ecology, evolution and biogeography of dioecy in the genus Solanum: with paradigms from the strong dioecy in Solanum polygamum to the unsuspected and cryptic dioecy in Solanum conocarpum. Am J Bot. 102(3):471–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Anderson MK. 1987. Assaying pollinator visitation to Solanum flowers. Solanaceae Newsl. 2(5):12.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Anderson MK. 1989. Assaying pollinator visitation to Solanum flowers. Solanaceae Newsl.  3(1):71.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Lopez P, Crawford D, Stuessy T. 2000. Reproductive biology of Wahlenbergia (Campanulaceae) endemic to Robinson Crusoe Island (Chile). Plant Syst Evol. 223:109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Gensel PG. 1976. Pollen morphology and the systematics of Solanum section Basarthrum. Pollen et Spores. 18(4):533–552.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Symon DE. 1985. Extrafloral nectaries in Solanum. Biotropica. 17(1):40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Symon DE. 1988. Insect foragers on Solanum in Australia. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 75(3):842–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ, Symon DE. 1989. Functional dioecy and andromonoecy in Solanum. Evolution. 43(1):204–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GJ. 1977. The variation and evolution of Solanum section Basarthrum. II. Brittonia. 29(1):116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt P. 1996. Anther adaptations in animal pollination. In: D’arcy WG, Keating R, editors. The anther: form, function, and phylogeny. Oxford: Cambridge University Press; p. 192–220.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann SL, Cane JH. 1989. Bees assess pollen returns while sonicating Solanum flowers. Oecologia. 81:281–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann SL, Jones CE, Colin LJ. 1977. Vibratile pollination of Solanum douglasii and S. xanti (Solanaceae) in southern California. Wasmann J Biol. 35(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP. 1996. The forgotten pollinators. Washington (DC): Island Press/Shearwater Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buchmann SL. 1983. Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In: jones CE, Little RJ, editors. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. New York (NY): Van Nostrand-Rheinhold, Inc.; p. 73–113.
   Google Scholar
• Cruden RW. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution. 31(1):32–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcy WG, D’Arcy NS, Keating RC. 1990. Scented anthers in the Solanaceae. Rhodora. 92(870):50–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23312666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer AG. 2012. The mysterious cognitive abilities of bees: why models of visual processing need to consider experience and individual differences in animal performance. J Exp Biol. 215(Pt 3):387–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endress PK. 1996. Diversity and evolutionary trends in angiosperm anthers. In: D’arcy WG, Keating R, editors. The anther: form, function, and phylogeny. Oxford: Cambridge University Press: p. 92–110.
   Google Scholar
• Faegri K. 1986. The solanoid flower. Trans Bot Soc Edinb. 45(sup1):51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:375–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin-Tong VE, Franklin FCH. 2003. The different mechanisms of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358(1434):1025–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JA, Kuchs OM. 1902. Observations of the pollination of Solanum rostratum Dunal and Cassia chamaecrista L. Univ Kansas Sci Bull. 1:15–43. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/21218#page/25/mode/1up.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JA. 1905. The dehiscence of anthers by apical pores. Mo Bot Gard Annu Rep. 1905:167–257.
   Google Scholar
• Horth L, Campbell L, Bray R. 2014. Wild bees preferentially visit flower heads with exaggerated ultraviolet absorbing floral guides. Biol Open. 3(3):221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye DW, Gill DE, Dudash MR, Fenster CB. 1994. A model and lexicon for pollen fate. Am J Bot. 81(12):117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SD, Andersson S. 2002. A simple field method for manipulating ultraviolet reflectance of flowers. Can J Bot. 80:1325–1328.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns AK, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Klomberg Y, Dywou Kouede R, Bartoš M, Mertens JE, Tropek R, Fokam EB, Janeček Š. 2019. The role of ultraviolet reflectance and pattern in the pollination system of (Hypoxidaceae). AoB Plants. 11(5):plz057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski MH, Ashman TL. 2014. Dissecting pollinator responses to a ubiquitous ultraviolet floral pattern in the wild. Funct Ecol. 28(4):868–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine DA, Anderson GJ. 1986. Evolution of dioecy in an American Solanum. In: D’Arcy WG, editor. Solanaceae: biology and systematics. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; p. 264–273.
   Google Scholar
• Lunau K, Ren ZK, Fan XQ, Trunschke J, Pyke GH, Wang H. 2020. Nectar mimicry: a new phenomenon. Sci Rep. 10(1):7039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin FW. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34(3):125–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martine CT, Symon DE, Evans E. 2013. A new cryptically dioecious species of bush tomato (Solanum) from the Northern Territory, Australia. PhytoKeys. 30:23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mione T, Anderson GJ. 1992. Pollen ovule ratios and breeding system evolution in Solanum section Basarthrum. Am J Bot. 79:279–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndem-Galbert JR, Hall JE, McDonnell AJ, Martine CT. 2021. Differential reward in “male” versus” female” pollen of functionally dioecious Solanum. Am J Bot. 108(11):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbán LL, Plowright CMS. 2014. Getting to the start line: how bumblebees and honeybees are visually guided towards their first floral contact. Insectes Soc. 61(4):325–336. 10.1007/s00040-014-0366-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passarelli L, Bruzzone L. 2004. Significance of floral colour and scent in three Solanum sect. Cyphomandropsis species (Solanaceae) with different floral rewards. Aust J Bot. 52:659–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazima M, Vogel S, Cocucci A, Hausner G. 1993. The perfume flowers of Cyphomandra (Solanaceae): pollination by euglossine bees, bellows mechanism, osmophores, and volatiles. Plant Syst Evol. 187:51–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaccabarozzi D, Lunau K, Guzzetti L, Cozzolino S, Dyer AG, Tommasi N, Biella P, Galimberti A, Labra M, Bruni I, et al. 2022. Mimicking orchids lure bees from afar with exaggerated ultraviolet signals. Ecol Evol. 13:e9759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, BP. 1987. The role of male flowers in Solanum carolinense: pollen donors or pollinator attractors? Evol Trends Plants. 1(2):89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer CM, Hogendoorn K, Ravi S, Combes SA. 2016. Shakers and head bangers: differences in sonication behavior between Australian Amegilla murrayensis (blue-banded bees) and North American Bombus impatiens (bumblebees). Arthropod Plant Interact. 10:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Marín M, Pereira Nunes CE, Russell AL. 2022. Anther cones increase pollen release in buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers. Evolution. 76(5):931–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Marín M, Rausher MD. 2007. Andromonoecious species: energetic costs and siring success in Solanum carolinense L. Evolution. 61(2):404–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Der Kooi CJ, Dyer AG, Kevan PG, Lunau K. 2019. Functional significance of the optical properties of flowers for visual signaling. Ann Bot. 123(2):263–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel S. 1978. Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers. In: Richards A, editor. The Pollination of Flowers by Insects. Linnean Society Symposium Series, Vol. 6, Academic Press. p. 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Waser NM, Price MV. 1983. Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium nelsonii. Nature. 302:422–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waser NM, Price MV. 1985. The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with a montane herb. Oecologia. 67(1):121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weathers WW, Cole R, editors. 1985. Flora and fauna of the Stebbins Cold Canyon Reserve. Publication #29, Davis (CA): Institute of Ecology, University of California. p. 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen MD, Anderson GJ. 1981. Distribution of gametophytic self-incompatibility and infrageneric classification in Solanum. Taxon. 30(4):761–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmer P. 2011. Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, USA.
   Google Scholar