Tree tracking: species selection and traceability for sustainable and biodiversity-friendly urban reforestation

References

• Abad Viñas R, Caudullo G, Oliveira S, de Rigo D. 2016. Pinus pinea in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A, editors. European atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU.
   Google Scholar
• Adams KL, Palmer JD. 2003. Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: gene loss and transfer to the nucleus. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 29(3):380–395. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00194-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applequist WL, Wagner WL, Zimmer EA, Nepokroeff M. 2006. Molecular evidence resolving the systematic position of Hectorella (Portulacaceae). BioOne. 31(2):310–319. doi: 10.1600/036364406777585900.
   Google Scholar
• Baldacchini C, Castanheiro A, Maghakyan N, Sgrigna G, Verhelst J, Alonso R, Amorim JH, Bellan P, Bojović DĐ, Breuste J, et al. 2017. How does the amount and composition of PM deposited on Platanus acerifolia leaves change across different cities in Europe? Environ Sci Technol. 51(3):1147–1156. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronetti A, González-Hidalgo JC, Vicente-Serrano SM, Acquaotta F, Fratianni S. 2020. A weekly spatio-temporal distribution of drought events over the Po Plain (North Italy) in the last five decades. Int J Climatol. 40(10):4463–4476. doi: 10.1002/joc.6467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli F, Savo V, Caneva G. 2022. Biodiversity of urban street trees in Italian cities: a comparative analysis. Plant Biosyst. 156(3):649–662. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2021.1906347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci F, Peruzzi L, Galasso G, Albano A, Alessandrini ANMG, Ardenghi NMG, Astuti G, Bacchetta G, Ballelli S, Banfi E, et al. 2018. An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosyst. 152(2):179–303.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer KM, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A, Bogar S, Nieto FJ, Malecki KM. 2014. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11(3):3453–3472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110303453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biella P, Tommasi N, Akter A, Guzzetti L, Klecka J, Sandionigi A, Labra M, Galimberti A. 2019. Foraging strategies are maintained despite workforce reduction: a multidisciplinary survey on the pollen collected by a social pollinator. PLoS One. 14(11):e0224037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Biondi E, Izco J. 2011. 100 years of plant sociology: a celebration. Plant Biosyst. 145(sup1):1–3. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2011.602865.
   Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Capotorti G, Copiz R, Guida D, Mollo B, Smiraglia D, Zavattero L. 2014. Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy. Plant Biosyst. 148(6):1255–1345. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2014.985756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasi C, Capotorti G, Copiz R, Mollo B. 2018. A first revision of the Italian Ecoregion map. Plant Biosyst. 152(6):1201–1204. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2018.1492996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E. 2006. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann for Sci. 63(6):625–644. doi: 10.1051/forest:2006042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno A, Sandionigi A, Agostinetto G, Bernabovi L, Frigerio J, Casiraghi M, Labra M. 2019. Food tracking perspective: DNA metabarcoding to identify plant composition in complex and processed food products. Genes. 10(3):248. doi: 10.3390/genes10030248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahyaningsih YF, Sutanto A, Santoso PJ, Arsyad MA, Larekeng SH. 2021. Amplification rate of matK and rbcL genes in three types of durian. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 886(1):012011. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/886/1/012011.
   Google Scholar
• Capotorti G, Del Vico E, Anzellotti I, Celesti-Grapow L. 2016. Combining the conservation of biodiversity with the provision of ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure planning: critical features arising from a case study in the metropolitan area of Rome. Sustainability. 9(1):10. doi: 10.3390/su9010010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron WF. 2003. Plants in the environment: amenity horticulture. In: Thomas B, Murphy D, Murray B, editors. The encyclopedia of applied plant sciences. London: Elsevier Science Ltd; p. 735–742.
   Google Scholar
• Casiraghi M, Labra M, Ferri E, Galimberti A, De Mattia F. 2010. DNA barcoding: a six-question tour to improve users’ awareness about the method. Brief Bioinform. 11(4):440–453. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbq003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, van der Bank M, Chase MW, Cowan RS, Erickson DL, Fazekas AJ, et al. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(31):12794–12797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905845106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JJM, Ip YCA, Ng CSL, Huang D. 2020. Takeaways from Mobile DNA barcoding with BentoLab and MinION. Genes. 11(10):1121. doi: 10.3390/genes11101121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, Haider N, Savolainen V. 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360(1462):1889–1895. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Gao T, Pang X, et al. 2010. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One. 5(1):e8613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng T, Xu C, Lei L, Li C, Zhang Y, Zhou S. 2016. Barcoding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and specificity. Mol Ecol Resour. 16(1):138–149. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copernicus Bulletin. 2022. https://climate.copernicus.eu/seasonal-review-europes-record-breaking-summer [accessed 2023 Mar 21].
   Google Scholar
• Cox DT, Shanahan DF, Hudson HL, Fuller RA, Anderson K, Hancock S, Gaston KJ. 2017. Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 14(2):172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2023. Guidelines on biodiversity-friendly afforestation, reforestation and tree planting – commission staff working document-SWD(2023)61 https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents register/detail?ref=SWD(2023)61&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Fares S, Paoletti E, Calfapietra C, Mikkelsen TN, Samson R, Le Thiec D. 2017. Carbon sequestration by urban trees. In: Pearlmutter D, Calfapietra C, Samson R, O’Brien L, Ostoić SK, Sanesi G, Alonso del Amo R, editors. The urban forest: cultivating green infrastructure for people and the environment. Cham: Springer; p. 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Farjon A. 2010. A handbook of the world’s conifers. 2 Vols. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Fatima T, Srivastava A, Somashekar PV, Hanur VS, Rao MS. 2019. Development of DNA-based species identification and barcoding of three important timbers. Bull Natl Res Cent. 43(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s42269-019-0116-8.
   Google Scholar
• Frigerio J, Agostinetto G, Mezzasalma V, De Mattia F, Labra M, Bruno A. 2021. DNA-based herbal teas’ authentication: an ITS2 and psbA-trnH multi-marker DNA metabarcoding approach. Plants. 10(10):2120. doi: 10.3390/plants10102120.
   Google Scholar
• Gaglio M, Pace R, Muresan AN, Grote R, Castaldelli G, Calfapietra C, Fano EA. 2022. Species-specific efficiency in PM2. 5 removal by urban trees: from leaf measurements to improved modeling estimates. Sci Total Environ. 844:157131. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso G, Conti F, Peruzzi L, Ardenghi NMG, Banfi E, Celesti-Grapow L, Albano A, Alessandrini A, Bacchetta G, Ballelli S, et al. 2018. An updated checklist of the vascular flora alien to Italy. Plant Biosyst. 152(3):556–592.
   Google Scholar
• González-Toral C, S. Nava H, Bueno Á, Fernández Prieto JA, Cires E. 2022. Molecular characterization of Hedera (Araliaceae) from Atlantic Iberian Peninsula. Plant Biosyst. 156(3):769–775. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2021.1918785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant DM, Brodnicke OB, Evankow AM, Ferreira AO, Fontes JT, Hansen AK, Jensen MR, Kalaycı TE, Leeper A, Patil SK, et al. 2021. The future of DNA barcoding: reflections from early career researchers. Diversity. 13(7):313. doi: 10.3390/d13070313.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines on Biodiversity-Friendly Afforestation, Reforestation and Tree Planting. 2023. Brussels: European Commission, 17.3.2023 SWD 61 final. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/guidelines-biodiversity-friendly-afforestation-reforestation-and-tree-planting_en.
   Google Scholar
• Harfouche A, Meilan R, Altman A. 2014. Molecular and physiological responses to abiotic stress in forest trees and their relevance to tree improvement. Tree Physiol. 34(11):1181–1198. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 270(1512):313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo O, Garnatje T, Susanna A, Mathez J. 2004. Phylogeny of Valerianaceae based on matK and ITS markers, with reference to matK individual polymorphism. Ann Bot. 93(3):283–293. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunziker S, Begert M, Scherrer SC, Rigling A, Gessler A. 2022. Below average midsummer to early autumn precipitation evolved into the main driver of sudden scots pine vitality decline in the Swiss Rhône Valley. Front for Glob Change. 5:874100. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.874100.
   Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Deng Z, Zang R, Long W. 2017. DNA barcoding analysis and phylogenetic relationships of tree species in tropical cloud forests. Sci Rep. 7(1):12564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13057-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kattge J, Bönisch G, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Tautenhahn S, Werner GDA, Aakala T, Abedi M, et al. 2020. TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access. Glob Chang Biol. 26(1):119–188. :   doi: 10.1111/gcb.14904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WM, Lee HJ, Song W. 2022. Environmental DNA metabarcoding effectively monitors terrestrial species by using urban green spaces. Urban For Urban Green. 78:127782. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitajima K, Bolker BM. 2003. Testing performance and rank reversals among coexisting species:crossover point irradiance analysis by Sack and Grubb (2001) and alternatives. Funct Ecol. 17(2):276–281. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.07101.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf HE. 2002. Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse: Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie. Roloff A, Weisgerber H, Lang UM, Stimm B, Schütt P, editors. Weinheim: Wiley-Vch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Krakau UK, Liesebach M, Aronen T, Lelu-Walter MA, Schneck V. 2013. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Forest tree breeding in Europe: current state-of-the-art and perspectives. In: Pâques L, editors. Forest tree breeding in Europe. Managing forest ecosystems. Vol. 25. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 267–323.
   Google Scholar
• Kress WJ, Erickson DL. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One. 2(6):e508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress WJ, García-Robledo C, Uriarte M, Erickson DL. 2015. DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 30(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laćan I, McBride JR, De Witt D. 2015. Urban forest condition and succession in the abandoned city of Pripyat, near Chernobyl, Ukraine. Urban For Urban Green. 14(4):1068–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcher W. 1995. Physiological plant ecology. Ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. Berlin (Germany): Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• López González G. 2001. Árboles y arbustos de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa.
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor CJ, Kitson JJ, Fox R, Hahn C, Lunt DH, Pocock MJ, Evans DM. 2019. Construction, validation, and application of nocturnal pollen transport networks in an agro-ecosystem: a comparison using light microscopy and DNA metabarcoding. Ecol Entomol. 44(1):17–29. doi: 10.1111/een.12674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manes F, Marando F, Capotorti G, Blasi C, Salvatori E, Fusaro L, Ciancarella L, Mircea M, Marchetti M, Chirici G, et al. 2016. Regulating ecosystem services of forests in ten Italian metropolitan cities: air quality improvement by PM10 and O3 removal. Ecol Indic. 67:425–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MASE 2021. Piano di forestazione urbana ed extraurbana. https://www.mase.gov.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/PNRR/PNRR_piano_forestazione.pdf [retrieved 2023 Jul 15].
   Google Scholar
• McPherson EG, Simpson JR. 2003. Potential energy savings in buildings by an urban tree planting programme in California. Urban For Urban Green. 2(2):73–86. doi: 10.1078/1618-8667-00025.
   Google Scholar
• Michel CI, Meyer RS, Taveras Y, Molina J. 2016. The nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) as a practical plant DNA barcode for herbal medicines. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 3(3):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguez M, Bartolucci F, Jiménez-Mejías P, Martín-Bravo S. 2022. Re-evaluating the presence of Carex microcarpa (Cyperaceae) in Italy based on herbarium material and DNA barcoding. Plant Biosyst. 156(3):628–634. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2021.1897703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikac S, Žmegač A, Trlin D, Paulić V, Oršanić M, Anić I. 2018. Drought-induced shift in tree response to climate in floodplain forests of Southeastern Europe. Sci Rep. 8(1):16495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34875-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakashizuka T. 2001. Species coexistence in temperate, mixed deciduous forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 16(4):205–210. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02117-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netherer S, Schopf A. 2010. Potential effects of climate change on insect herbivores in European forests—general aspects and the pine processionary moth as specific example. For Ecol Manage. 259(4):831–838. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S. 2013. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med. 11:222. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinemets Ü. 2010. Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seedlings to mature plants: past stress history, stress interactions, tolerance and acclimation. For Ecol Manage. 260(10):1623–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinemets Ü, Valladares F. 2006. Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate Northern Hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol Monogr. 76(4):521–547. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak DJ, Crane DE. 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut. 116(3):381–389. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00214-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palahi M, Pukkala T, Trasobares A. 2008. The use of tree level vs. stand level data in forest planning calculations—does it really matter? Ann for Sci. 65(1):110–110. 2008). doi: 10.1051/forest:2007082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardos M, Climent J, Almeida H, Calama R. 2014. The role of developmental stage in frost tolerance of Pinus pinea L. seedlings and saplings. Ann for Sci. 71(5):551–562. doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0361-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel V, Pauli N, Biggs E, Barbour L, Boruff B. 2021. Why bees are critical for achieving sustainable development. Ambio. 50(1):49–59. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01333-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pericolo O, Camarero JJ, Colangelo M, Valeriano C, Sánchez-Salguero R, Borghetti M, Castellaneta M, Nola P, Ripullone F. 2023. Species specific vulnerability to increased drought in temperate and Mediterranean floodplain forests. Agric For Meteorol. 328:109238. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109238.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer A. 2019. The silviculture of trees used in British forestry. IrIsh For. 76(1&2):105–106.
   Google Scholar
• Recanatesi F, Giuliani C, Rossi CM, Ripa MN. 2019. A remote sensing-assisted risk rating study to monitor pinewood forest decline: the study case of the Castelporziano State Nature Reserve (Rome). Smart Innov Syst Technol. 100:68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. 2006. Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends Ecol Evol. 21(1):1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NV, Patil PG, Sowjanya RP, Parashuram S, Natarajan P, Babu KD, Pal RK, Sharma J, Reddy UK. 2021. Chloroplast genome sequencing, comparative analysis, and discovery of unique cytoplasmic variants in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Front Genet. 12:704075. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.704075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AF, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC. 2002. Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner city children. J Environ Psychol. 22(1–2):49–63. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommasi N, Biella P, Guzzetti L, Lasway JV, Njovu HK, Tapparo A, Agostinetto G, Peters MK, Steffan-Dewenter I, Labra M, et al. 2021. Impact of land use intensification and local features on plants and pollinators in Sub-Saharan smallholder farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 319:107560. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares F, Dobarro I, Sanchez-Gomez D, Pearcy RW. 2005. Photoinhibition and drought in Mediterranean woody saplings: scaling effects and interactions in sun and shade phenotypes. J Exp Bot. 56(411):483–494. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitlow TH, Harris RW. 1979. Flood tolerance in plants: a state-of-the-art review. Washington (DC): National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Wells NM, Evans GW. 2003. Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environ Behavior. 35(3):311–330. doi: 10.1177/0013916503035003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe KH. 1991. CHAPTER 15–protein-coding genes in chloroplast DNA: compilation of nucleotide sequences, data base entries, and rates of molecular evolution. In: Bogorad L, editor. The photosynthetic apparatus: molecular biology and operation. New York: Academic Press; p. 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Yin J, Gentine P, Slater L, Gu L, Pokhrel Y, Hanasaki N, Guo S, Xiong L, Schlenker W. 2023. Future socio-ecosystem productivity threatened by compound drought–heatwave events. Nat Sustain. 6(3):259–272. doi: 10.1038/s41893-022-01024-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Chui TFM. 2019. Linking hydrological and bioecological benefits of green infrastructures across spatial scales – a literature review. Sci Total Environ. 646:1219–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Xu W, Li R. 2017. Visual preference of trees: the effects of tree attributes and seasons. Urban For Urban Green. 25:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar