References
- Bruce, D.M. and Bruce, A. (2000) ‘Animal welfare and use’ in Hodges J and Han IK (eds.) Livestock, ethics and quality of life. Oxon: CABI Publishing, pp. 53–77.
- Buehr, M., Hjorth, J.P., Kornerup Hansen, A. and Sandøe, P. (2004) ‘Genetically modified laboratory animals—What welfare problems do they face?’ Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6: 319–338.
- Christensen, L.G. (1998) ‘Future market and consumer-oriented breeding goals’, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science. Supplement 28: 45–53.
- Donovan, J. (1990) ‘Animal rights and feminist theory’, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15.
- Frey, R.G. (2001) ‘Justifying animal experimentation: the starting point’ in Frankel Paul E and Paul J (eds.) Why animal experimentation matters. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 197–214.
- Gaskell, G., Allum, N. and Stares, S. (2003) ‘Europeans and biotechnology 2002’, Eurobarometer 58.0
- INRA (Europe) (2000) Eurobarometre 52. 1. Les Europeens et la biotechnologie.
- Lassen, J. and Sandøe, P. (2002) ‘After Dolly—Public perception of animal technology’, European Society for Domestic Animal Reproduction (ESDAR), Newsletter 8, August.
- Mench, J.A. (2002) ‘Animal health and welfare’ in Animal biotechnology: Science-based concerns. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
- Narveson, J. (1983) ‘Animal rights revisited’ in Miller HB and Williams WH (eds.) Ethics and animals. Clifton NJ: Humana Press.
- Norton, B.G. (1995) ‘Caring for nature: A broader look at animal stewardship’ in Norton BG, Hutchins M, Stevens, EF and Maple TL (eds.) Ethics on the ark: Zoos, animal welfare and wildlife conservation. Washington/London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
- Pontifical Academy for Life (2003) Concluding communiqué on the ethics of biomedical research. For a Christian view. 24–26 February.
- Olsson, I.A.S., Robinson, P., Pritchett, K. and Sandøe, P. (2002) ‘Animal research ethics’ in Van Hoosier G. and Hau J (eds.) Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science (second edition). CRC Press.
- Olsson, I.A.S. and Sandøe, P. (2004) ‘Ethical decisions concerning animal biotechnology: what is the role of animal welfare science?’ Animal Welfare 13, S:139–144.
- Regan, T. (1983) The case for animal rights. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
- Regan, T. (1989) ‘The case for animal rights’ in Regan, T. and Singer, P. (eds.) Animal rights and human obligations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Rollin, B.E. (1976) ‘Animal pain’ in Regan, T. and Singer, P. (eds.) Animal rights and human obligations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Rutgers, B. and Heeger, R. (1999) ‘Inherent worth and respect for animal integrity’ in Dol, M., van Vlissingen, M.F., Kasanmoentalib, S., Visser, T. and Zwart, H. (eds.) Recognizing the intrinsic value of nature. Assen: Van Gorcum.
- Sandøe, P., Crisp, R. and Holtug, N. (1997) ‘Animal ethics’ in Appleby, M.C. and Hughes, B.O. (eds.) Animal welfare. Oxon: CAB International.
- Sandøe, P. and Holtug, N. (1998) ‘Ethical aspects of biotechnology’, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science. Supplement 29: 51–58.
- Singer, P. (1975) Animal Liberation. New York: Avon Books.
- Singer, P. (1989) ‘All animals are equal’ in Regan, T. and Singer, P. (eds.) Animal rights and human obligations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.