References
- Beauchamp, T.L. (2000). Reply to Strong on Principlism and Casuistry. “Journal of Medicine and Philosophy” 25(3):345.
- Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (1977). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (fifth edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Brandom, R.B. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Clouser, K.D. and Gert, B. (1990). A critique of principlism, “The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy”, 15: 219–236.
- Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jonsen, A.R. and Toulmin, S. (1988). The abuse of casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Quante, M. and Vieth. A. (2002). Defending Principlism Well Understood. “Journal of Medicine and Philosophy”. 27(6): 621–649.
- Rawls, J. (1971; 1999). A Theory of Justice, (revised edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Richardson, H.S. (1990). “Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19: 279–310.
- Strong, C. (2000). “Specified principlism: What is it, and does it really resolve cases better than casuistry?”. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(3): 285–307.