References
- Åarhus Convention (1998) The Åarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (adopted June 1998, ratified October 2001) (accessible online: www.unece.org/env/pp/welcome.html).
- Beder, S. (1999) ‘Public Participation or Public Relations?’ in Martin, B. (ed.) Technology and Public Participation. University of Wollongong, Australia: University of Wollongong Press.
- Bok, S. 1995. Common Values. University of Missouri Press: Columbia.
- Brown, D.E. 1991 Human Universals, McGraw-Hill: New York.
- Clarke, R. (2002) Radiological Protection of the Environment: The Path Forward to a New Policy. Paris: NEA/OECD.
- Dienel, P.C. and Renn, O. (1995) 'Planning Cells: A Gate to ‘Fractal’ Mediation' in Renn, O. et al., eds (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, Technology, Risk and Society Vol. 10, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 130.
- EC (2001) European Commission Directive 2001/18 of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs (revision of directive 90/220) (available online: www.europa.eu.int).
- House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, 1999. Management of Nuclear Waste, London: The Stationery Office.
- Hunt, J. (2003) ‘Consultation and Participation’ in Anderson, K. (ed.) Proceedings of Valdor 2003, Values in Decisions on Risk, 9–13 June, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Martin, B. (ed.) 1999. Technology and Public Participation. Wollongong: University of Wollongong Printery.
- Kaiser, M and Forsberg, E-M (2002). Consensus conference on environmental values in radiation protection: a report on building consensus among experts, Science and Engineering Ethics, 8
- Kraft, M.E. and Clary, B.B. (1993) ‘Public Testimony in Nuclear Waste Repository Hearings: A content Analysis’ in R.E. Dunlap et al, Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste. London: Duke University Press.
- LLRC 2003. Low Level Radiation Campaign (www.llrc.org).
- Oughton, D.H. and Strand, P. (2003) ‘The Oslo Consensus conference on protection of the environment’, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 74: 7–17.
- Oughton, D.H., Bay, I., Kaiser, M., Forsberg, E-M., Strand, P. (2002) ‘The Oslo consensus conference model’ in Strand, P. and Oughton, D.H. (eds.) Radiation Protection in the 21st Century: Ethical, Philosophical and Environmental issues. Osteras: NRPA/AUN, pp. 71–76.
- Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press: London.
- Renn, O. et al., eds (1995), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, Technology, Risk and Society Vol. 10, Kluwer Academic Publ.
- Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. (2000O Public participation methods: A Framework for Evaluation, Science, Technology and Human Values, 29: 3–29.
- Shrader-Frechette, K.S. (1991) Risk and Rationality, Univ. California Press: Berkeley.
- Wallentinus, H-G. and Paivo, J. (2001) ‘The Hallandsas Railway Tunnel Project in Sweden’ in Hilding-Rydevik, T. (ed.) The Role of Environmental Impact assessment in the Planning and Decision Process of Large Development Projects in Nordic Countries. Stockholm: Norderegio Report.
- UNEP 1992. Rio Declaration. United Nations Environment Programme. (UNEP) available online at: www.un.org/documents/ga/confl5l/aconf5126–1annex1.htm
- Webler, T. (1995) ‘”Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: an Evaluative Yardstick’ in: Renn, O. et al. (eds.) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation, Technology, Risk and Society Vol. 10, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 35–86.